China Plans To Replace All 70,000 Beijing Taxis With Electric Cars


Taxis are the bane of all urban areas. Typically, they are poorly made, poorly maintained, and spew tons of carbon dioxide into the air every day as they shuttle people from place to place. Beijing has nearly 70,000 taxis. It also has an intractable problem with smog. While it has embarked on an aggressive program to encourage private citizens to buy what it calls “new energy vehicles” — hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and battery operated cars — that push has not made much of an impact on the taxi fleet in China’s capitol. Now it has announced a plan to replace all 67,000 fossil fueled taxis in the city with electric cars.

China wants electric cars for taxis

The changeover won’t happen right away. It begins with a mandate that any new taxis placed in service must be electric but that means it could be a decade or more before all older vehicles are replaced. The project is expected to cost taxi operators $1.3 billion before it is complete. The entry level fossil fueled cars in use today cost about $10,000. Equivalent electric cars cost twice as much.

China is paying the price for its rapid economic expansion, most of which has been powered by electricity generated in coal fired facilities. During the recent Olympic games in Beijing, it ordered many factories to shut down for weeks and banned buses and vehicles from its streets. The plan worked as millions of Beijing residents saw the sun for the first time in months but it came at a huge economic cost.

A study in 2015 found that air pollution was responsible for up to 4,000 premature deaths a day throughout China. Last month, government officials ordered a local company called Air Matters to stop reporting pollution levels that exceed the government’s official air quality index of 500. No better way to solve a problem than by officially ignoring it.

The plan to electrify Beijing’s taxi fleet has one drawback, however.  There are not enough charging stations for the hundreds of electric taxis already in service in the capitol city. Drivers often have to wait hours to get access to a charger. “There are 200 electric taxis on the streets of Tongzhou in Beijing, but only about 100 are on the road, while the other 100 are waiting to be charged,” a driver told business newspapaer Caixin.

Source: Mashable





About the Author

I have been a car nut since the days when Rob Walker and Henry N. Manney, III graced the pages of Road & Track. Today, I use my trusty Miata for TSD rallies and occasional track days at Lime Rock and Watkins Glen. If it moves on wheels, I'm interested in it. Please follow me on Google + and Twitter.
  • Epicurus

    Charging stations don’t cost much compared to building gas stations or hydrogen stations or CNG stations, assuming electricity lines are as ubiquitous as they are in other cities.

    If China has all the raw materials for building EVs, the Central Committee could use its power to get those taxis built, one way or the other. It is a dictatorship after all. For one thing, they could use slave labor. For another, they could nationalize whatever they need to.

    • Jerry3130

      I take you say some of these sarcastically, otherwise, you seems ignorant about how things work in China.

      • Epicurus

        Okay, enlighten me. There’s no longer a dictatorship of the proletariat in China?

        • Jerry3130

          Just sticking to the topic here.
          First, productionwise, EV are built by private companys, there are several of them similar to the big three in US. One of them, BYD, happened to be the largest EV manufacturer globally, sold 74,000 unit in the first 9 month last year. So it doesn’t need Central Committee, or PLA, or slave to build taxi.
          Second, they didn’t need to nationalize the company because Warren Buffet had 10% stake in the company.
          Third, they do recognize private property, that means the private taxi company need to pull out more capital to buy the EV due to limitation.
          Hopefully I didn’t muddle up further for you.

          • Epicurus

            I realize they have been mimicking a capitalist economy for quite a long time now (the very worst kind with few or no safety, environmental and workplace regulations), but is there any constitutional, legal or political impediment to reverting to a communist command economy at the drop of a hat? My guess: no.

            My point was about what they could do–what is possible–not what they are doing.