Autonomous Cars driverless-car

Published on September 17th, 2013 | by Andrew Meggison

11

The Ethics of Driverless Cars

driverless-carAutonomous cars are a reality on the roads today, and it might not be long before they become commonplace on America’s roads. This raises some serious issues though with the ethics of autonomous cars.

One of the much lauded effects of having autonomous cars on the road is the predicted decrease in in traffic related deaths. Currently over 34,000 Americans die in car accidents every year, the largest accidental killer of Americans. This, despite many advances in terms of safety cars have come a long way. Modern cars are equipped with  many air bags, and increasingly sensors that can slow you down or detect a passing vehicle in you blind spot. But no matter what a person is still in control of the vehicle, and people make mistakes.

Autonomous cars remove the human element from driving and by doing so, theoretically, the number of traffic related deaths caused by humans behind the wheel will drop. But accidents will still happen, especially with robots and humans sharing the road, and lives will still be lost. But if you own a self-driving car, will you become immune from scrutiny?

Classical ethical problems like the Non-Identity problem, essentially the identities of future fatality victims, would change with the introduction of autonomous cars. Under Consequentialism sequence of thought, if there are more lives being saved then the end result is a positive and so a good ethical move for society.

Chaos theory, or the buttery effect, is another good one; anything we do could start a chain-reaction of other effects that result in actual harm or benefit to some person on the planet. Imagine a person was going to become a truck driver, but all truck drivers have been replaced by robotic trucks. So the person seeks a different path in life, and perhaps accomplishes something either great or evil. Remember, Hitler was a scorned artist before he was a genocidal dictator, and Napoleon was only an artillerly officer who wasn’t even born in France.

I think one of the best ethical problems to place the driverless car in is the Trolley Problem. In this example, in place of the trolley is a school bus loaded with kids and you behind the wheel of a car on a narrow road and you are going to crash. This is a no win situation, either you pull off the road and sacrifice yourself or you hit the bus killing the kids and yourself. If you are in an autonomous car, will the vehicle be able to make the decision to save dozens of young lives at the cost of yours? Probably not.

So, because of the decision made by the robot car, the kids are dead but you are saved. Flip that around, and if the car kills you to save the kids, without your consent, is the automaker at fault? Who gets blamed in this unlikely scenario? By having autonomous cars are the people just riding in them liable? Makes you think…

As a society we are quickly venturing into unknown waters in terms of the mass use of autonomous cars. While automakers such as Volvo are pursuing driverless cars with safety in mind, there are bound to be major legal ramifications in the deployment of hands-off vehicles. I for one find the prospects of the autonomous car very exciting and promising, but at the same time I’m fascinated by the ethical and potential legal issues that may come in its wake. Will autonomous cars save us from ourselves?

Source: Wired

 

Andrew Meggison was born in the state of Maine and educated in Massachusetts. Andrew earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Government and International Relations from Clark University and a Master’s Degree in Political Science from Northeastern University. Being an Eagle Scout, Andrew has a passion for all things environmental. In his free time Andrew enjoys writing, exploring the great outdoors, a good film, and a creative cocktail. You can follow Andrew on Twitter @AndrewMeggison 


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Andrew Meggison was born in the state of Maine and educated in Massachusetts. Andrew earned a Bachelor's Degree in Government and International Relations from Clark University and a Master's Degree in Political Science from Northeastern University. In his free time Andrew enjoys writing, exploring the great outdoors, a good film, and a creative cocktail. You can follow Andrew on Twitter @AndrewMeggison



  • Jason Carpp

    Driverless cars? That’s crazy! I wouldn’t mind having a car that helps the driver in emergency situations – say help to swerve to avoid an accident. But to have the car drive for the person driving? Thanks, but I prefer being able to drive a car and control the vehicle.

    • DanielWindham

      I agree about still wanting to choose to control it. But what about the 16 year old girl who really hates to drive to High school every morning and would love to be able to eat and do her makeup safely on the way? She won’t mind. What about the commuter that wants to catch up on email to/from work? If you aren’t controlling the car directly, would you have as much road rage? Or any at all? As these auto technologies become more normal in the next 10-15 years over 25 million Americans will have learned how to drive. What seems odd to some will be normal to them, and they will wonder why you ever had to sit in traffic pressing the brake over and over.

      • Jason Carpp

        Then perhaps he should wait until he’s done eating and then he can drive the car. You cannot do both at the same time.

        • Helen OB

          It’s much more than simply doing your make up or catching up with work; 93% of car accidents are caused by human error. Millions of injuries and fatalities can be stopped with autonomous cars, which won’t make a wrong call on a roundabout, or get distracted by kids in the back of the car, or drive too close to the car in front.

          • Jason Carpp

            I agree, accidents are caused by human error, and sometimes we need some help in order to avoid an accident in the first place.

        • DanielWindham

          I would agree, he shouldn’t eat and drive *todays* cars. But he could very easily if it were autonomous. I think of it like any other technology in the last 20 years- it’s hard to imagine that people waited for slow things to work or that they did things so manually. The automation gets taken for granted after it happens and is accepted.

  • Pingback: The Ethics of Driverless Cars

  • Pingback: Benefits of autonomous cars | radicaldesi

  • Pingback: Living in a Technologically Advanced World | The era of the fully autonomous car

  • Pingback: philosophy point of view to see the autonomous vehicle- more about the ethics | The Future of autonomous vehicle

  • markosheat@twittering.com

    Autonimus is not nesseserily the ultimate aim ,one could have the benefit of interactive traffic based on each vehcal reacting in a cotrol of speed alternating to each corresponding relative space control corresponding to each others actions & relative legal speed limits also dictating reaction intentions both to relertive flow & so to give relertive information from one vehcal to another in both onward flow &incoming flow related to speed destination & dominating actuality of spacal confineds ,this is all relertive both two actually and emerging alterations taking place such as accident emergencys need to have an application for integration once all these are considered and moniterd anylised ongoing out come should lead to a fully smooth &flowing traffic controled by information actionary resolve by interactary related movement

Back to Top ↑