The Next Step In Future Transportation: Marine Highways?


America’s roads, especially around metropolitan areas, have long exceeded their capacity to move people and cargo efficiently. Having spent 3 hours on a six-lane super highway in SoCal to go just 60 miles, I now understand that better than ever. Part of the problem is all those long-haul trucks. They take up the space of four or five cars, get terrible gas mileage, and when they have an accident, it usually shuts down the highway. There has to be a better way.

And there just might. The Department of Transportation is working on an idea to promote marine highways. The idea is that smaller cargo ships could transport large loads longer distances, taking long haul trucks off the road. Could it work?

For centuries, the only quick way to move a large quantity of goods was via boats. No secret there. Between trains and automobiles though, shipping suddenly became unfashionable. Most shipping done today is the overseas sort, from one continent to another. The DOT wants to make small-scale shipping big again. The idea looks to Europe for influence, where small ships called RoRo’s travel up and down Europe’s many river delivering goods to small ports. Connecticut was once a huge port state, though now most traffic passes it right by on the way to New York or New Jersey, which have the crane capacity to handle large loads of containers.

RoRo’s wouldn’t need cranes though. Instead, trucks can drive right up onto a RoRo, hook up their load, and leave. Since they are smaller than large container ships, they can fit in shallower rivers. The idea is to create jobs by building up a lot of smaller ports. Then the loads can be put on either trains or short-haul trucks. This isn’t unlike the history of the steamboat, which for decades made travel along America’s many rivers quicker than previously possible. It brought civilization to many parts previously unsettled, and inspired writers like Mark Twain.

While I think this idea has merits, especially concerning job creation, I question the environmental soundness of such a plan. Big boats run on heavy oil, and even smaller ships still spew out an incredible amount of emissions. So do big trucks. And the impact on local ecosystems from ships plowing through shallow rivers, especially those running through our nation’s many national parks and protected areas, could be disastrous. The options will have to be carefully weighed on this one.

Source: Wired

Chris DeMorro is a car enthusiast, blogger, and all-around crazy man who is as passionate about hybrids as he is about Hemis. You can follow his constant misadventures at Three Months In A Mustang.

You Might Also Like

4 Responses to “The Next Step In Future Transportation: Marine Highways?”

  1. Harold Says:

    European waterways generally don’t freeze up in winter. Barges in the U.S. do carry enourmous amounts of goods. Look at the Mississippi for example. Or the Hudson. That which can travel efficiently by ship in the US is travelling by ship. Ship travel here is suitable for bulk items such as coal, ore, oil, grain. Stuff which requires a constant pipeline flow. Containers from city to city travel faster by rail or truck, and most containers carry time valued contents.

    Rail in the last decade has taken a tremendous number of trucks off the road, and will continue to do so if left unregulated. Also, they’ve almost doubled ton miles/gallon. The governement is making noises about reregulating them…

  2. Alex Says:

    to me that cargo trucks are only one factor contributing to congestion. the major problem is just what you said, capacity has not changed much if at all and there continue to be more people on the road every day. roads here were just not designed for the amount of traffic that they get. it doesn’t help that most people don’t have a clue how to drive in congested traffic…

  3. Fernando Says:

    Actually, those trucks don’t have terrible gas mileage. 6 or 7 MPG? While towing 80,000 lbs? Let’s see your piece of shit Prius do that. Let’s say the average car weigh 2 tons (4000 lbs.)

    80,000/4000=20
    20*6=120

    So, the equivalent of 120 mpg per vehicle (approximately, obviously that’s not an exact science). Yeah, shove it.

  4. apex Says:

    Boats are more efficient, but it’s not a good idea.

    One of the unfortunate tragedies of mankind is that we’ve used rivers and canals as transportation. It seems innocuous enough at first, but as infrastructure has grown, we’ve covered some of the best farmland with urban development. River deltas are for agriculture not transport of goods, and as the world’s population grows we will need more efficient use of water and farming land.

    Rail is better b/c rail lines and train depots don’t have to be built on ag land.