Weight is without a doubt the enemy of efficiency. Once, all that extra heft was considered a safety feature, but with new technologies that make cars safer even at lighter weights, now it is considered more of a hindrance than anything. Yet, despite space age materials and new construction methods, most cars still weigh well over 3000 pounds. This has put automakers in an uphill battle, where they have to move increasingly heavier cars with smaller engines, while still maintaining some sort of “fun” factor while driving.
But a recent study by Lotus suggests that mainstream automakers could achieve a 38% reduction in the mass of the car (not including the drivetrain) — and thereby increase fuel efficiency 23% — yet only increase costs associated with the extra manufacturing by a scant 3%.
Lotus has always been in the business of making their cars as light as possible. This is why Lotus vehicles are often described as “driver’s cars” because they handle so spectacularly. Lotus decided to apply their methodology to more mainstream vehicles though, like the Toyota Venza crossover. Lotus disassembled the Venza (which when equipped with all-wheel drive has a 4,000 pound curb weight) and tried to re-imagine it as a lighter vehicle. Figure the drive train weighs in at 700 pounds, that means they could have shaved off over 1,000 pounds from the Venza, which would lead to much better fuel economy.
In order to lose all that weight, Lotus employed “mass reduction technology,” like efficient design, component integration, construction and material selection. Does that mean we will all be driving carbon fiber cars by 2020? Not likely. I do expect car parts to integrate more though, and for manufacturers to employ careful design to minimize weight and maximize aerodynamics. The most glaring part of this study though is it would cost automakers just 3% more to make these reductions. I wonder how safety would hold up?
Source: Green Car Advisor
PDF 
About Christopher DeMorro
I believe that smaller, lighter cars are the way to go but, at 6’6″ and over 300lbs, can I get a small car that holds fewer larger people? I am sure there must be a market for large people who want efficient cars.
I believe that smaller, lighter cars are the way to go but, at 6’6″ and over 300lbs, can I get a small car that holds fewer larger people? I am sure there must be a market for large people who want efficient cars.
And when the Ford Fairlane was introduced one of the great selling points was the removal of steel from areas that did not need it.
A few years later Ford determined that by restoring the missing steel at a minimal weight increase, the safety, ride, and the handling improved much more than the weight increased. There was no discernable change in the fuel mileage.
Of course, computers are much better now.
And when the Ford Fairlane was introduced one of the great selling points was the removal of steel from areas that did not need it.
A few years later Ford determined that by restoring the missing steel at a minimal weight increase, the safety, ride, and the handling improved much more than the weight increased. There was no discernable change in the fuel mileage.
Of course, computers are much better now.
“I believe that smaller, lighter cars are the way to go but, at 6′6″ and over 300lbs, can I get a small car that holds fewer larger people? I am sure there must be a market for large people who want efficient cars.”
Have you tried a Geo Metro 2dr hatchback? I’m 6’5″ and 250 lbs and I fit with plenty of head room and legroom. Of course, they stopped making them back in 2000 (they made the 4-dr only in 2001).
“I believe that smaller, lighter cars are the way to go but, at 6′6″ and over 300lbs, can I get a small car that holds fewer larger people? I am sure there must be a market for large people who want efficient cars.”
Have you tried a Geo Metro 2dr hatchback? I’m 6’5″ and 250 lbs and I fit with plenty of head room and legroom. Of course, they stopped making them back in 2000 (they made the 4-dr only in 2001).
I drive a Smart Car by Mercedes Benz. 40 mpg, two seater with a nice little “trunk” area for more stuff than you’d think.
My husband is 6’9, 270 lbs and fits very comfortably on passenger side with plenty of head room and knees don’t touch the dashboard. He can’t drive it due to the slightly oval shape of the steering wheel making turning impossible and that his size 17 feet are a bit large for the spacing of the gas and brake pedals.
BUT we save a TON of $ running errands in it together rather than driving the suburban. We use the burb for hauling people and large cargo type stuff!
I drive a Smart Car by Mercedes Benz. 40 mpg, two seater with a nice little “trunk” area for more stuff than you’d think.
My husband is 6’9, 270 lbs and fits very comfortably on passenger side with plenty of head room and knees don’t touch the dashboard. He can’t drive it due to the slightly oval shape of the steering wheel making turning impossible and that his size 17 feet are a bit large for the spacing of the gas and brake pedals.
BUT we save a TON of $ running errands in it together rather than driving the suburban. We use the burb for hauling people and large cargo type stuff!