<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Westfield Sportscars Developing Electric iRacer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/#comment-13701</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4404#comment-13701</guid>
		<description>The iRacer is certainly a noisy electric car!



Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iRacer is certainly a noisy electric car!</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/#comment-37219</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4404#comment-37219</guid>
		<description>The iRacer is certainly a noisy electric car!



Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iRacer is certainly a noisy electric car!</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/#comment-13700</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4404#comment-13700</guid>
		<description>The comparison with a NASCAR vehicle is not a valid comparison until you also factor in the fact that the power required increases as the cube of the speed increase. To make a valid comparison the distance covered by the NASCAR vehicle should be multiplied by roughly 1,73^3 or about 5.2. That has the NASCAR vehicle covering about 400 miles, at equivalent speeds. Funny, but this is very similar to what my &#039;86 Mustang did.



You can NOT compare ranges at different speeds and draw any reasonable conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparison with a NASCAR vehicle is not a valid comparison until you also factor in the fact that the power required increases as the cube of the speed increase. To make a valid comparison the distance covered by the NASCAR vehicle should be multiplied by roughly 1,73^3 or about 5.2. That has the NASCAR vehicle covering about 400 miles, at equivalent speeds. Funny, but this is very similar to what my &#8217;86 Mustang did.</p>
<p>You can NOT compare ranges at different speeds and draw any reasonable conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2010/01/07/westfield-sportscars-developing-electric-iracer/#comment-37218</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4404#comment-37218</guid>
		<description>The comparison with a NASCAR vehicle is not a valid comparison until you also factor in the fact that the power required increases as the cube of the speed increase. To make a valid comparison the distance covered by the NASCAR vehicle should be multiplied by roughly 1,73^3 or about 5.2. That has the NASCAR vehicle covering about 400 miles, at equivalent speeds. Funny, but this is very similar to what my &#039;86 Mustang did.



You can NOT compare ranges at different speeds and draw any reasonable conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparison with a NASCAR vehicle is not a valid comparison until you also factor in the fact that the power required increases as the cube of the speed increase. To make a valid comparison the distance covered by the NASCAR vehicle should be multiplied by roughly 1,73^3 or about 5.2. That has the NASCAR vehicle covering about 400 miles, at equivalent speeds. Funny, but this is very similar to what my &#8217;86 Mustang did.</p>
<p>You can NOT compare ranges at different speeds and draw any reasonable conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

