<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Improves Fleet Fuel Efficiency By 20% Over Last Five Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-13463</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-13463</guid>
		<description>I bought my 2000 V8 F-150 over the Chevy Silverado because it was more fuel efficient at 15/20 MPG.  I was really diappointed when Ford came out with the squarer F-150 in 2005 that had worse mileage.  Ford picked a bad time to do this, because GM/Chevy improved their truck&#039;s mileage and sales of the F-150 plummeted.



I will be really interested in the new 4.6L clean diesel engine Ford has talked about for the F-150.  If this truck can achieve high 20s and they don&#039;t charge a fat premium for it, I am in for an upgrade.  Otherwise, I will continue to cruise my 2000 F-150, since it gets comparable mileage to the new trucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my 2000 V8 F-150 over the Chevy Silverado because it was more fuel efficient at 15/20 MPG.  I was really diappointed when Ford came out with the squarer F-150 in 2005 that had worse mileage.  Ford picked a bad time to do this, because GM/Chevy improved their truck&#8217;s mileage and sales of the F-150 plummeted.</p>
<p>I will be really interested in the new 4.6L clean diesel engine Ford has talked about for the F-150.  If this truck can achieve high 20s and they don&#8217;t charge a fat premium for it, I am in for an upgrade.  Otherwise, I will continue to cruise my 2000 F-150, since it gets comparable mileage to the new trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-37012</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-37012</guid>
		<description>I bought my 2000 V8 F-150 over the Chevy Silverado because it was more fuel efficient at 15/20 MPG.  I was really diappointed when Ford came out with the squarer F-150 in 2005 that had worse mileage.  Ford picked a bad time to do this, because GM/Chevy improved their truck&#039;s mileage and sales of the F-150 plummeted.



I will be really interested in the new 4.6L clean diesel engine Ford has talked about for the F-150.  If this truck can achieve high 20s and they don&#039;t charge a fat premium for it, I am in for an upgrade.  Otherwise, I will continue to cruise my 2000 F-150, since it gets comparable mileage to the new trucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my 2000 V8 F-150 over the Chevy Silverado because it was more fuel efficient at 15/20 MPG.  I was really diappointed when Ford came out with the squarer F-150 in 2005 that had worse mileage.  Ford picked a bad time to do this, because GM/Chevy improved their truck&#8217;s mileage and sales of the F-150 plummeted.</p>
<p>I will be really interested in the new 4.6L clean diesel engine Ford has talked about for the F-150.  If this truck can achieve high 20s and they don&#8217;t charge a fat premium for it, I am in for an upgrade.  Otherwise, I will continue to cruise my 2000 F-150, since it gets comparable mileage to the new trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Smith</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-13461</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-13461</guid>
		<description>New engines for the Mustang are for the 2011 (not 2010, already on sale) which launches in the spring....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New engines for the Mustang are for the 2011 (not 2010, already on sale) which launches in the spring&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Smith</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-37011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-37011</guid>
		<description>New engines for the Mustang are for the 2011 (not 2010, already on sale) which launches in the spring....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New engines for the Mustang are for the 2011 (not 2010, already on sale) which launches in the spring&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-37010</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-37010</guid>
		<description>This is good news.  I&#039;ve always been a GM guy and part of the reason was that GM always seemed to have better fuel economy than Ford for comparable vehicles.  Given GM&#039;s recent woes, I&#039;ll gladly switch to Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news.  I&#8217;ve always been a GM guy and part of the reason was that GM always seemed to have better fuel economy than Ford for comparable vehicles.  Given GM&#8217;s recent woes, I&#8217;ll gladly switch to Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/21/ford-improves-fleet-fuel-efficiency-by-20-over-last-five-years/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4346#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>This is good news.  I&#039;ve always been a GM guy and part of the reason was that GM always seemed to have better fuel economy than Ford for comparable vehicles.  Given GM&#039;s recent woes, I&#039;ll gladly switch to Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news.  I&#8217;ve always been a GM guy and part of the reason was that GM always seemed to have better fuel economy than Ford for comparable vehicles.  Given GM&#8217;s recent woes, I&#8217;ll gladly switch to Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

