<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deja Vu: Scientists Turn Pollution Directly Into Fuel Using The Sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13326</guid>
		<description>Um, if you don&#039;t know you can&#039;t prove a negative, then you are beyond help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, if you don&#8217;t know you can&#8217;t prove a negative, then you are beyond help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-36958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-36958</guid>
		<description>Um, if you don&#039;t know you can&#039;t prove a negative, then you are beyond help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, if you don&#8217;t know you can&#8217;t prove a negative, then you are beyond help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zane</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13325</link>
		<dc:creator>zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13325</guid>
		<description>Maybe you can hook up a CO2 booster to this process. They are used to increase yields in greenhouses-- by increasing CO2 levels.



Google: CO2 Boost - All-natural CO2 Generators for the purpose of CO2



Don&#039;t tell the EPA or anything. They may decide that plant boosting is poisonous.



By the way, Al Gore is a fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you can hook up a CO2 booster to this process. They are used to increase yields in greenhouses&#8211; by increasing CO2 levels.</p>
<p>Google: CO2 Boost &#8211; All-natural CO2 Generators for the purpose of CO2</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell the EPA or anything. They may decide that plant boosting is poisonous.</p>
<p>By the way, Al Gore is a fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zane</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-36957</link>
		<dc:creator>zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-36957</guid>
		<description>Maybe you can hook up a CO2 booster to this process. They are used to increase yields in greenhouses-- by increasing CO2 levels.



Google: CO2 Boost - All-natural CO2 Generators for the purpose of CO2



Don&#039;t tell the EPA or anything. They may decide that plant boosting is poisonous.



By the way, Al Gore is a fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you can hook up a CO2 booster to this process. They are used to increase yields in greenhouses&#8211; by increasing CO2 levels.</p>
<p>Google: CO2 Boost &#8211; All-natural CO2 Generators for the purpose of CO2</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell the EPA or anything. They may decide that plant boosting is poisonous.</p>
<p>By the way, Al Gore is a fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Chambers</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13324</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13324</guid>
		<description>Jack,



Before I am forced to defend myself even given the overwhelming support I have the world over, my only question to you is, where do you get your evidence that global warming is not man made? My evidence that it is man made is in the form of thousands of scientific papers on the topic, more than 13 years of undergraduate and graduate education in geology, soil science, microbiology, agriculture, and chemistry courses, never ending research on the topic to be able to publish about it, and an open mind. What&#039;s yours? The opinions of some fringe &quot;scientists&quot; funded by big oil, republican lobbyists, or the like? Rush Limbaugh? Glenn Beck? Seriously, I&#039;d like to know what your proof is to back up your claim that global warming is not man made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>Before I am forced to defend myself even given the overwhelming support I have the world over, my only question to you is, where do you get your evidence that global warming is not man made? My evidence that it is man made is in the form of thousands of scientific papers on the topic, more than 13 years of undergraduate and graduate education in geology, soil science, microbiology, agriculture, and chemistry courses, never ending research on the topic to be able to publish about it, and an open mind. What&#8217;s yours? The opinions of some fringe &#8220;scientists&#8221; funded by big oil, republican lobbyists, or the like? Rush Limbaugh? Glenn Beck? Seriously, I&#8217;d like to know what your proof is to back up your claim that global warming is not man made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>&quot;The assertion that “large portions” of the scientific data and literature regarding climate change have been manipulated clearly shows that you have no concept of the amount of overwhelming information out there that indicates global warming is occurring and it is caused by humans.&quot;



This is a complete falsehood! There is NO evidence that global warming is man-made. Where is your proof sir? [slap!]



The trend in fact, is down. THank you very much. Global temperatures show a consistent decrease, so glad you brought it up. But you wouldn&#039;t know that, and even if you did you are inclined to dismiss it (as I am sure you are engaged in such a mental pursuit at this moment). Since the reaction is: &#039;oh, the temperatures might go, they might go down. They equally prove the case that global warming is happening.&#039; Such a view is incoherent, sorry to break it to you. If said temperatures rise, even if by a little bit and are triumphantly held to be solid evidence of global warming, then the converse must be true as well, undercutting the entire argument.



If ever we want/need an example of weak minds to demonstrate the power of suggestability (if not guillibility) we can look not just to the average lemming but the ones who ought to know better. Perhaps Bush could have said instead: &quot;I had to abandon scientific method in order to save the earth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The assertion that “large portions” of the scientific data and literature regarding climate change have been manipulated clearly shows that you have no concept of the amount of overwhelming information out there that indicates global warming is occurring and it is caused by humans.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a complete falsehood! There is NO evidence that global warming is man-made. Where is your proof sir? [slap!]</p>
<p>The trend in fact, is down. THank you very much. Global temperatures show a consistent decrease, so glad you brought it up. But you wouldn&#8217;t know that, and even if you did you are inclined to dismiss it (as I am sure you are engaged in such a mental pursuit at this moment). Since the reaction is: &#8216;oh, the temperatures might go, they might go down. They equally prove the case that global warming is happening.&#8217; Such a view is incoherent, sorry to break it to you. If said temperatures rise, even if by a little bit and are triumphantly held to be solid evidence of global warming, then the converse must be true as well, undercutting the entire argument.</p>
<p>If ever we want/need an example of weak minds to demonstrate the power of suggestability (if not guillibility) we can look not just to the average lemming but the ones who ought to know better. Perhaps Bush could have said instead: &#8220;I had to abandon scientific method in order to save the earth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-36956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-36956</guid>
		<description>&quot;The assertion that “large portions” of the scientific data and literature regarding climate change have been manipulated clearly shows that you have no concept of the amount of overwhelming information out there that indicates global warming is occurring and it is caused by humans.&quot;



This is a complete falsehood! There is NO evidence that global warming is man-made. Where is your proof sir? [slap!]



The trend in fact, is down. THank you very much. Global temperatures show a consistent decrease, so glad you brought it up. But you wouldn&#039;t know that, and even if you did you are inclined to dismiss it (as I am sure you are engaged in such a mental pursuit at this moment). Since the reaction is: &#039;oh, the temperatures might go, they might go down. They equally prove the case that global warming is happening.&#039; Such a view is incoherent, sorry to break it to you. If said temperatures rise, even if by a little bit and are triumphantly held to be solid evidence of global warming, then the converse must be true as well, undercutting the entire argument.



If ever we want/need an example of weak minds to demonstrate the power of suggestability (if not guillibility) we can look not just to the average lemming but the ones who ought to know better. Perhaps Bush could have said instead: &quot;I had to abandon scientific method in order to save the earth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The assertion that “large portions” of the scientific data and literature regarding climate change have been manipulated clearly shows that you have no concept of the amount of overwhelming information out there that indicates global warming is occurring and it is caused by humans.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a complete falsehood! There is NO evidence that global warming is man-made. Where is your proof sir? [slap!]</p>
<p>The trend in fact, is down. THank you very much. Global temperatures show a consistent decrease, so glad you brought it up. But you wouldn&#8217;t know that, and even if you did you are inclined to dismiss it (as I am sure you are engaged in such a mental pursuit at this moment). Since the reaction is: &#8216;oh, the temperatures might go, they might go down. They equally prove the case that global warming is happening.&#8217; Such a view is incoherent, sorry to break it to you. If said temperatures rise, even if by a little bit and are triumphantly held to be solid evidence of global warming, then the converse must be true as well, undercutting the entire argument.</p>
<p>If ever we want/need an example of weak minds to demonstrate the power of suggestability (if not guillibility) we can look not just to the average lemming but the ones who ought to know better. Perhaps Bush could have said instead: &#8220;I had to abandon scientific method in order to save the earth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13322</link>
		<dc:creator>Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13322</guid>
		<description>RE: Carbon Dioxide eating microbes

Headlines shortly after microbes are put to work making fuel from atmospheric CO2: &quot;World faces dangerous Carbon Dioxide deficit. Talks in Copenhagen move towards a Carbon Dioxide Deficit Tax to be collected internationally and paid to large fuel CO2 refinery corporations (ex oil corporations). Developing nations and individuals have been put on notice: Make more CO2 or be prepared to pay a significant CO2 deficit tax.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Carbon Dioxide eating microbes</p>
<p>Headlines shortly after microbes are put to work making fuel from atmospheric CO2: &#8220;World faces dangerous Carbon Dioxide deficit. Talks in Copenhagen move towards a Carbon Dioxide Deficit Tax to be collected internationally and paid to large fuel CO2 refinery corporations (ex oil corporations). Developing nations and individuals have been put on notice: Make more CO2 or be prepared to pay a significant CO2 deficit tax.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-36955</link>
		<dc:creator>Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-36955</guid>
		<description>RE: Carbon Dioxide eating microbes

Headlines shortly after microbes are put to work making fuel from atmospheric CO2: &quot;World faces dangerous Carbon Dioxide deficit. Talks in Copenhagen move towards a Carbon Dioxide Deficit Tax to be collected internationally and paid to large fuel CO2 refinery corporations (ex oil corporations). Developing nations and individuals have been put on notice: Make more CO2 or be prepared to pay a significant CO2 deficit tax.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Carbon Dioxide eating microbes</p>
<p>Headlines shortly after microbes are put to work making fuel from atmospheric CO2: &#8220;World faces dangerous Carbon Dioxide deficit. Talks in Copenhagen move towards a Carbon Dioxide Deficit Tax to be collected internationally and paid to large fuel CO2 refinery corporations (ex oil corporations). Developing nations and individuals have been put on notice: Make more CO2 or be prepared to pay a significant CO2 deficit tax.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ant721</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/12/11/deja-vu-scientists-turn-pollution-directly-into-fuel-using-the-sun/#comment-13321</link>
		<dc:creator>ant721</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=4312#comment-13321</guid>
		<description>If this tech proves to be a little too efficient, then Big Oil will hide  it, get rid of it, asap!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this tech proves to be a little too efficient, then Big Oil will hide  it, get rid of it, asap!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

