Nissan EV Chief Talks About Quietness Versus Safety of Electric Cars

Editor’s Note: This is part three of an exclusive sit down I had with Hideaki Watanabe, Nissan’s Division Manager of their Global Zero Emission Business Unit, at last week’s U.S. debut of the LEAF in Los Angeles. Part one is devoted to battery swapping, part two to battery leasing, and part four to the different zero emissions directions of Renault and Nissan within their alliance.
Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn made it a point to highlight how quiet the upcoming Nissan LEAF electric car will be during an event in Los Angeles last week to mark the car’s U.S. debut. “LEAF has no engine, no tailpipe, no fuel tanks,” he remarked. “As a result LEAF has zero carbon emissions, zero particle [emissions] and zero noise. It’s quiet and clean.”
The gathering crowd of electric car makers has been drumming this “quiet mantra” since day one, and, indeed, it is certainly a great selling point. But recently the quietness of EVs has come under scrutiny as a potential safety hazard to the blind, the elderly, and children; if you can’t hear the car, it’s one less warning you have of an impending accident.
>> Interested in solar power? See if group discounts are available in your city
>> Don’t forget to: Sign up for our electric car interest list.
Automakers, including Nissan, have announced their intentions to build sounds into EVs to alert at-risk populations. Even aftermarket companies have hitched themselves to the adding-sound-to-EVs-wagon, suggesting things such as downloadable “ringtones.”
Although I have mixed feelings about all of this (it’s bad enough that I hear a Britney Spears ringtone in the movie theater), I’ve begun to wonder if EVs will produce even more noise than cars with engines. If it’s a given that EVs will produce sounds to increase safety, can automakers really claim that the cars are quiet as a selling point? I asked Hideaki Watanabe, Nissan’s Division Manager of their Global Zero Emission Business Unit, to fill me in on Nissan’s plans in this area.
Mr. Watanabe noted that there are some things that will be out of Nissan’s control. “If the regulations come out, we have to comply with the regulations,” he said. “That’s it. If it kills the quietness of the low speed, it’s mandatory. The regulation is what is the best for that market, so that we have to comply with whatever it is.”
However, even though it seems that EVs will likely be required to emit noises to protect certain at-risk populations, it likely won’t be required in all situations. “Even if the authorities apply those regulations, I’m not really sure it it’s going to be like that for all the speed ranges,” Mr. Watanabe explained. “It’s only for the low speed range and when you’re stopped you likely won’t have a sound. So in some certain range of speeds they will require it, but above [or below] those speeds there will likely be no problems.”
Because of the restricted range in which noises may be required, Mr. Watanabe thinks that in general they can still say the LEAF is quiet.
When asked if Nissan should try and be proactive and get involved with the decision makers and policy influencers now about EV noises, Mr. Watanabe remarked, “There are a lot of opinions within Nissan. The bottom line is that we won’t be able to influence that. Of course, as an automotive company we are in several discussions with the authorities and we have given our opinion about it, but we really can’t rule the world.”
Other Posts in This Series:
- Nissan Global EV Chief: Battery Swapping Likely Won’t Work in U.S.
- Nissan Electric Car Chief Explains LEAF Battery Leasing
- Is the Renault-Nissan Alliance Going in Two Different Electric Car Directions?
Dislaimer: The author’s travel and lodging expenses were paid for by Nissan to attend the Los Angeles unveiling of the LEAF.





November 19th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
We’ve become so innured to noise pollution we don’t notice it anymore, though, biologically speaking, our bodies do notice it, whether we acknowledge this or not.
There are plenty of studies out there that show that the noise of modern industrial society takes a real physiological and psychological toll on us.
It seems to me that we can come up with something better to address potential safety issues with quieter cars than enveloping ourselves in exactly the same noise pollution we have right now.
In fact, I know we can come up with something better — sophisticated electronic warning systems for drivers, electronic radar devices for bikes, blind pedestrians, etc.
But I’m pessimistic that’s the direction we’ll go in.
What’s next? Laws that require me to add a Harman Kardon-Lotus-like VROOOM to my EV?
P.S. — If you’re curious about what’s potentially in store for EVs, check out this video on the UK Guardian’s web site: The HALOsonic electric car sound system — http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2009/nov/16/halosonic-electric-car
November 20th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
We would ban bicycles because they are quiet and do not produce emissions. Think we are in a foclear (fossil fuel+nuclear) minded oligarchy. Regards.