<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Working On Efficient, Shape-Changing, Memory Metal Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/02/gm-working-on-efficient-shape-changing-memory-metal-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/02/gm-working-on-efficient-shape-changing-memory-metal-engine/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/02/gm-working-on-efficient-shape-changing-memory-metal-engine/#comment-12680</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3967#comment-12680</guid>
		<description>&quot;We&#039;re stuck with internal combustion engines&quot; Uh no we&#039;re not. It&#039;s stupid peoples&#039; attitudes like that that got us in this mess in the first place. Ever heard of the Tesla? Or the Volt? Or even a hybrid? Why would you just say we&#039;re stuck with combustion engines? GM knows of better engine technology too. The GEET engine for one, and they are simply refusing to adapt it for whatever greed-based reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re stuck with internal combustion engines&#8221; Uh no we&#8217;re not. It&#8217;s stupid peoples&#8217; attitudes like that that got us in this mess in the first place. Ever heard of the Tesla? Or the Volt? Or even a hybrid? Why would you just say we&#8217;re stuck with combustion engines? GM knows of better engine technology too. The GEET engine for one, and they are simply refusing to adapt it for whatever greed-based reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/02/gm-working-on-efficient-shape-changing-memory-metal-engine/#comment-36362</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3967#comment-36362</guid>
		<description>&quot;We&#039;re stuck with internal combustion engines&quot; Uh no we&#039;re not. It&#039;s stupid peoples&#039; attitudes like that that got us in this mess in the first place. Ever heard of the Tesla? Or the Volt? Or even a hybrid? Why would you just say we&#039;re stuck with combustion engines? GM knows of better engine technology too. The GEET engine for one, and they are simply refusing to adapt it for whatever greed-based reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re stuck with internal combustion engines&#8221; Uh no we&#8217;re not. It&#8217;s stupid peoples&#8217; attitudes like that that got us in this mess in the first place. Ever heard of the Tesla? Or the Volt? Or even a hybrid? Why would you just say we&#8217;re stuck with combustion engines? GM knows of better engine technology too. The GEET engine for one, and they are simply refusing to adapt it for whatever greed-based reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

