<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Algae-Based, Non-Metallic Batteries Could Revolutionize Energy Storage Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: micheal</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-12284</link>
		<dc:creator>micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-12284</guid>
		<description>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micheal</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35628</link>
		<dc:creator>micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35628</guid>
		<description>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micheal</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35629</link>
		<dc:creator>micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35629</guid>
		<description>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may i know what type of cladophora is been using for this application? is it cladopora catenata, stimpsonii,ceolothrix, sericea, vagabunda or prolifera..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william mcgowan</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-12283</link>
		<dc:creator>william mcgowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-12283</guid>
		<description>you know whats cool. as we as humans,re learn what we as human race knew long ago.

we get to watch the show a new.this time organic power cells. and that is cool.

yeap cool.

william mc gowan.

thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know whats cool. as we as humans,re learn what we as human race knew long ago.</p>
<p>we get to watch the show a new.this time organic power cells. and that is cool.</p>
<p>yeap cool.</p>
<p>william mc gowan.</p>
<p>thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HexHammer</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-12282</link>
		<dc:creator>HexHammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-12282</guid>
		<description>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.



Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.

We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.



Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.</p>
<p>Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.</p>
<p>We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.</p>
<p>Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HexHammer</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35625</link>
		<dc:creator>HexHammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35625</guid>
		<description>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.



Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.

We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.



Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.</p>
<p>Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.</p>
<p>We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.</p>
<p>Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HexHammer</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35626</link>
		<dc:creator>HexHammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35626</guid>
		<description>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.



Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.

We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.



Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.</p>
<p>Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.</p>
<p>We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.</p>
<p>Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HexHammer</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35627</link>
		<dc:creator>HexHammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35627</guid>
		<description>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.



Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.

We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.



Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did it say this was green and safe? The batteries may be, but the production pre-process isnt.</p>
<p>Polypyrrole, which is what the algae is coated with to make it conductive leaves some nasty byproducts to make in bulk, although smaller scale yeilds have been obtained with Hydrogen Peroxide, which isnt environmentally dangerous. It is pretty intensive as a process though, so its expensive.</p>
<p>We all know how industry reacts to that: use the cheap way and let the grandchildren clean up the mess while we enjoy the sunset.</p>
<p>Great idea, lets just hope its used responsibly for once, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aureon Kwolek</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-12281</link>
		<dc:creator>Aureon Kwolek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-12281</guid>
		<description>Practicallity is more important than Cleaner. Compare two different uses: one on land and the other on a moving vehicle:



At 25% energy density, on land, space and weight are not so critical, so it&#039;s more practical. In contrast, on a moving vehicle, space and weight are critical. If the batteries weigh more or take up too much space on the moving vehicle, it won&#039;t be practical. That is, until some future date, when the power density gets closer and closer to li-ion. Still this could be a winner. We&#039;ll see how this plays out.



There are other factors influencing future vehicles, such as reduced weigh, solarvoltaic bodies, ultra-high efficiency motors, advanced PWM battery charging methods, smaller 80% efficient fuel cells for the range extender, advanced onboard water-splitting technology to name a few. These might reduce the amount of power we need today to run the vehicle - to a much lower power requirement. And that would make lower density batteries more practical too, especially if they were cheaper, or if there was a shortage or price surge of lithium.



The next big push would be to make these more efficient - to increase the enrgy density. The early computers filled up a whole room and were slower than your laptop. Researchers didn&#039;t give up just because they were inefficient. They found a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practicallity is more important than Cleaner. Compare two different uses: one on land and the other on a moving vehicle:</p>
<p>At 25% energy density, on land, space and weight are not so critical, so it&#8217;s more practical. In contrast, on a moving vehicle, space and weight are critical. If the batteries weigh more or take up too much space on the moving vehicle, it won&#8217;t be practical. That is, until some future date, when the power density gets closer and closer to li-ion. Still this could be a winner. We&#8217;ll see how this plays out.</p>
<p>There are other factors influencing future vehicles, such as reduced weigh, solarvoltaic bodies, ultra-high efficiency motors, advanced PWM battery charging methods, smaller 80% efficient fuel cells for the range extender, advanced onboard water-splitting technology to name a few. These might reduce the amount of power we need today to run the vehicle &#8211; to a much lower power requirement. And that would make lower density batteries more practical too, especially if they were cheaper, or if there was a shortage or price surge of lithium.</p>
<p>The next big push would be to make these more efficient &#8211; to increase the enrgy density. The early computers filled up a whole room and were slower than your laptop. Researchers didn&#8217;t give up just because they were inefficient. They found a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aureon Kwolek</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/11/algae-based-non-metallic-batteries-could-revolutionize-energy-storage-industry/#comment-35624</link>
		<dc:creator>Aureon Kwolek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3459#comment-35624</guid>
		<description>Practicallity is more important than Cleaner. Compare two different uses: one on land and the other on a moving vehicle:



At 25% energy density, on land, space and weight are not so critical, so it&#039;s more practical. In contrast, on a moving vehicle, space and weight are critical. If the batteries weigh more or take up too much space on the moving vehicle, it won&#039;t be practical. That is, until some future date, when the power density gets closer and closer to li-ion. Still this could be a winner. We&#039;ll see how this plays out.



There are other factors influencing future vehicles, such as reduced weigh, solarvoltaic bodies, ultra-high efficiency motors, advanced PWM battery charging methods, smaller 80% efficient fuel cells for the range extender, advanced onboard water-splitting technology to name a few. These might reduce the amount of power we need today to run the vehicle - to a much lower power requirement. And that would make lower density batteries more practical too, especially if they were cheaper, or if there was a shortage or price surge of lithium.



The next big push would be to make these more efficient - to increase the enrgy density. The early computers filled up a whole room and were slower than your laptop. Researchers didn&#039;t give up just because they were inefficient. They found a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practicallity is more important than Cleaner. Compare two different uses: one on land and the other on a moving vehicle:</p>
<p>At 25% energy density, on land, space and weight are not so critical, so it&#8217;s more practical. In contrast, on a moving vehicle, space and weight are critical. If the batteries weigh more or take up too much space on the moving vehicle, it won&#8217;t be practical. That is, until some future date, when the power density gets closer and closer to li-ion. Still this could be a winner. We&#8217;ll see how this plays out.</p>
<p>There are other factors influencing future vehicles, such as reduced weigh, solarvoltaic bodies, ultra-high efficiency motors, advanced PWM battery charging methods, smaller 80% efficient fuel cells for the range extender, advanced onboard water-splitting technology to name a few. These might reduce the amount of power we need today to run the vehicle &#8211; to a much lower power requirement. And that would make lower density batteries more practical too, especially if they were cheaper, or if there was a shortage or price surge of lithium.</p>
<p>The next big push would be to make these more efficient &#8211; to increase the enrgy density. The early computers filled up a whole room and were slower than your laptop. Researchers didn&#8217;t give up just because they were inefficient. They found a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

