Ford Executive Perspective: Developing and Producing Electric Vehicles is just one part of the Equation

Ford electric car

Editor’s Note: This is a guest contribution by Nancy Gioia, Ford’s Director of Sustainable Mobility Technologies and Hybrid Vehicle Programs.

It’s clear electric vehicles (EVs) will be part of the transportation mix of the future.

President Obama has set ambitious goals for wide-scale adoption of EV technology. Advances in battery technology will help bring more electrified vehicles to market for consumers and the desire to reduce CO2 emissions has increased attention on transportation alternatives like electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids.

At Ford, we understand the development and production of the vehicles will be just one part of the total electric transportation equation. While we’re well on our way to delivering the vehicles, and this remains a key focus of ours, we also know that for the vehicles to be adopted on a wide scale, the infrastructure to support the technology needs to be in place and we need to ensure that the national electric grid will be able to support the expected increased electric demand.

This is why Ford is working with electric utility partners across the country to understand the connectivity between the vehicle and the grid. Ford has worked closely with Southern California Edison since 2007. We have expanded that partnership to also work with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the US Department of Energy and 10 additional electric utilities across North America to collaboratively address the many challenges related to electrifying transportation. Together, we have already conducted more than 75,000 miles of plug-in hybrid testing with our demonstration vehicles.

As a result of this collaboration, Ford last month unveiled one of the industry’s first vehicle-to-electric grid communications and control systems. This system enables electric vehicles to interface with the grid for optimal recharging. And by optimal, we mean optimal for both the consumer and the electric grid. This technology would allow customers to program their vehicles to pull energy from the grid during specific times periods, when electricity is cheaper. This could save the customer money and reduce demand on the grid during those peak times of energy use.

Tweet This Post

Pages: 1 2

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

4 Comments

  1. Nancy, the S-Max is brilliant and you should get Capstone to package the generator for portable use in EVs with a propane tank so EVers can take a weekend trip to the woods or AAA can give one to a stranded EVer. You’d have to provide a through-body genset exhaust connection, an internal plug and an override for the no-charge while moving feature but this would allow EVs to be sold to single car owners who fear range limitations.
    If your series PHEVs had the ability to program the battery charging to only work that minimal amount needed for the specific desired range that you enter when you start, you could use a smaller genset and minimize weight, cost and fuel use. The smaller genset would start charging early instead of waiting for battery exhaustion but could provide the same range and maximize battery usage for any desired range you program at the start of the trip. You could enter a specific # of miles or let the computer calculate range using GPS waypoints.

  2. PS-all of your fuel buring vehicles should have a propane fueled option to reduce both emissions and fuel cost.

  3. Program the vehicle to only accept a charge when electric raters are lower, such as off-peak hours.

    I’m not aware of North American utilities that charge end users on a TOU basis for general consumers, we’re pretty much fixed rate…

    Hang on, we are going to be soon enough…

  4. This vehicle-to-grid communication technology is helping the battery serve as a storage to prevent the costly blackout. That means utilities are shedding cost for additional storage facilities and ratepayers are selling electricity for peak hours so that EVs can make more economic sense, as we know.

Tell us what you think: