Comments on: Patent Infringement Could Halt Toyota Hybrid Imports http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/ What is the future of fuel? What's new? What's next? Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction. Sat, 26 May 2012 14:06:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Keith http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-12147 Keith Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:29:42 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-12147 I think that we have allowed other countries to buy us and land that our troops have found for.. We buy import because we are not true americans anymore we are one big dollar sign and we are for sale at any price. I think that Toyota should be banned for our country so we can get back to where we were.. We have completely sold out ourselves and our fore fathers to other countries. There is no America anymore it is just the U.S.A. with a big MADE IN CHINA stamp across their nation, not our nation... I think that we have allowed other countries to buy us and land that our troops have found for.. We buy import because we are not true americans anymore we are one big dollar sign and we are for sale at any price. I think that Toyota should be banned for our country so we can get back to where we were.. We have completely sold out ourselves and our fore fathers to other countries. There is no America anymore it is just the U.S.A. with a big MADE IN CHINA stamp across their nation, not our nation…

]]> By: Keith http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-35495 Keith Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:29:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-35495 I think that we have allowed other countries to buy us and land that our troops have found for.. We buy import because we are not true americans anymore we are one big dollar sign and we are for sale at any price. I think that Toyota should be banned for our country so we can get back to where we were.. We have completely sold out ourselves and our fore fathers to other countries. There is no America anymore it is just the U.S.A. with a big MADE IN CHINA stamp across their nation, not our nation... I think that we have allowed other countries to buy us and land that our troops have found for.. We buy import because we are not true americans anymore we are one big dollar sign and we are for sale at any price. I think that Toyota should be banned for our country so we can get back to where we were.. We have completely sold out ourselves and our fore fathers to other countries. There is no America anymore it is just the U.S.A. with a big MADE IN CHINA stamp across their nation, not our nation…

]]> By: Chris DeMorro http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-12146 Chris DeMorro Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:25:37 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-12146 What is odd about that statement? I...don't like hybrids. It's a band-aid, not a cure. What is odd about that statement?

I…don’t like hybrids. It’s a band-aid, not a cure.

]]> By: Chris DeMorro http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-35494 Chris DeMorro Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:25:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-35494 What is odd about that statement? I...don't like hybrids. It's a band-aid, not a cure. What is odd about that statement?

I…don’t like hybrids. It’s a band-aid, not a cure.

]]> By: Ripe4Change http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-12145 Ripe4Change Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:46:07 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-12145 It wouldn't surprise me if big-oil and the Big-4 are behind this action to supress progress and the inevitable switch to non-oil based motion. It wouldn’t surprise me if big-oil and the Big-4 are behind this action to supress progress and the inevitable switch to non-oil based motion.

]]> By: Ripe4Change http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-35493 Ripe4Change Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:46:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-35493 It wouldn't surprise me if big-oil and the Big-4 are behind this action to supress progress and the inevitable switch to non-oil based motion. It wouldn’t surprise me if big-oil and the Big-4 are behind this action to supress progress and the inevitable switch to non-oil based motion.

]]> By: Russ Finley http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-12144 Russ Finley Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:33:07 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-12144 No fan of hybrids? That's an odd statement. No fan of hybrids? That’s an odd statement.

]]> By: Russ Finley http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-35492 Russ Finley Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:33:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-35492 No fan of hybrids? That's an odd statement. No fan of hybrids? That’s an odd statement.

]]> By: ChuckL http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-12143 ChuckL Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:25:53 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-12143 This appears to be just another case of a "Patent Troll" lying in wait for someone else to build something that they can adapt one of their unused patents to claim. This is a clear violation of the stated intent of the Constitutional authority for both patents and copyrights, which states "To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." Unfortunately, the writers of the Constitution did not provide a specific time, nor require that any attempt be made to develop and market a product in order to keep a patent or copyright valid. Congress has with the collusion of the Supreme Court reinterpreted "limited time" to mean "any specified time" and effectively turned a personal limited monopoly into an item of real property that can belong to a non human person, i.e. a business, setup only to collect royalties. There is no requirement that a product must be marketed by the owner of these "personal limited time monopolies", which are now NOT limited in time by any reasonable limit and which are NOT now personal. Paice is just taking advantage of the payoffs to congress from the congress' big business contributors. If you are as upset as I am about this violation of Constitutional intent by congress, write to them as I have done, multiple times, and express your views. This appears to be just another case of a “Patent Troll” lying in wait for someone else to build something that they can adapt one of their unused patents to claim.

This is a clear violation of the stated intent of the Constitutional authority for both patents and copyrights, which states “To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

Unfortunately, the writers of the Constitution did not provide a specific time, nor require that any attempt be made to develop and market a product in order to keep a patent or copyright valid. Congress has with the collusion of the Supreme Court reinterpreted “limited time” to mean “any specified time” and effectively turned a personal limited monopoly into an item of real property that can belong to a non human person, i.e. a business, setup only to collect royalties. There is no requirement that a product must be marketed by the owner of these “personal limited time monopolies”, which are now NOT limited in time by any reasonable limit and which are NOT now personal.

Paice is just taking advantage of the payoffs to congress from the congress’ big business contributors.

If you are as upset as I am about this violation of Constitutional intent by congress, write to them as I have done, multiple times, and express your views.

]]> By: ChuckL http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comment-35491 ChuckL Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:25:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=3423#comment-35491 This appears to be just another case of a "Patent Troll" lying in wait for someone else to build something that they can adapt one of their unused patents to claim. This is a clear violation of the stated intent of the Constitutional authority for both patents and copyrights, which states "To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." Unfortunately, the writers of the Constitution did not provide a specific time, nor require that any attempt be made to develop and market a product in order to keep a patent or copyright valid. Congress has with the collusion of the Supreme Court reinterpreted "limited time" to mean "any specified time" and effectively turned a personal limited monopoly into an item of real property that can belong to a non human person, i.e. a business, setup only to collect royalties. There is no requirement that a product must be marketed by the owner of these "personal limited time monopolies", which are now NOT limited in time by any reasonable limit and which are NOT now personal. Paice is just taking advantage of the payoffs to congress from the congress' big business contributors. If you are as upset as I am about this violation of Constitutional intent by congress, write to them as I have done, multiple times, and express your views. This appears to be just another case of a “Patent Troll” lying in wait for someone else to build something that they can adapt one of their unused patents to claim.

This is a clear violation of the stated intent of the Constitutional authority for both patents and copyrights, which states “To promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

Unfortunately, the writers of the Constitution did not provide a specific time, nor require that any attempt be made to develop and market a product in order to keep a patent or copyright valid. Congress has with the collusion of the Supreme Court reinterpreted “limited time” to mean “any specified time” and effectively turned a personal limited monopoly into an item of real property that can belong to a non human person, i.e. a business, setup only to collect royalties. There is no requirement that a product must be marketed by the owner of these “personal limited time monopolies”, which are now NOT limited in time by any reasonable limit and which are NOT now personal.

Paice is just taking advantage of the payoffs to congress from the congress’ big business contributors.

If you are as upset as I am about this violation of Constitutional intent by congress, write to them as I have done, multiple times, and express your views.

]]>