<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gasoline-Diesel Cocktail Could Make Engines Cleaner, More Efficient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHUCKIE CHEESES!</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-72327</link>
		<dc:creator>CHUCKIE CHEESES!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-72327</guid>
		<description>HAHA 
Imagine if that started and the engineer fell in...
X_X
lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA<br />
Imagine if that started and the engineer fell in&#8230;<br />
X_X<br />
lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vilas Khadse</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-12040</link>
		<dc:creator>Vilas Khadse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-12040</guid>
		<description>53% thermal efficiency is really a great achievement.But I think it is a long way to develope such systems for use in cars.However efforts needs to be intensified to commercialise this innovation in order to save huge quantity of fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53% thermal efficiency is really a great achievement.But I think it is a long way to develope such systems for use in cars.However efforts needs to be intensified to commercialise this innovation in order to save huge quantity of fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vilas Khadse</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-34983</link>
		<dc:creator>Vilas Khadse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-34983</guid>
		<description>53% thermal efficiency is really a great achievement.But I think it is a long way to develope such systems for use in cars.However efforts needs to be intensified to commercialise this innovation in order to save huge quantity of fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53% thermal efficiency is really a great achievement.But I think it is a long way to develope such systems for use in cars.However efforts needs to be intensified to commercialise this innovation in order to save huge quantity of fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gasburner</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-12039</link>
		<dc:creator>gasburner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-12039</guid>
		<description>The really big stationary combined cycle engines can get up to 60% efficiency nowadays ... the container ships do not hold the record.  Here is information from General Electric: http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really big stationary combined cycle engines can get up to 60% efficiency nowadays &#8230; the container ships do not hold the record.  Here is information from General Electric: <a href="http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gasburner</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-34982</link>
		<dc:creator>gasburner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-34982</guid>
		<description>The really big stationary combined cycle engines can get up to 60% efficiency nowadays ... the container ships do not hold the record.  Here is information from General Electric: http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really big stationary combined cycle engines can get up to 60% efficiency nowadays &#8230; the container ships do not hold the record.  Here is information from General Electric: <a href="http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ge-energy.com/prod_serv/products/gas_turbines_cc/en/h_system/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken O</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-12038</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-12038</guid>
		<description>Crazy talk! Sounds good though. Next we&#039;ll be mixing bananas and OJ in a blender! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy talk! Sounds good though. Next we&#8217;ll be mixing bananas and OJ in a blender! <img src='http://c1gas2org.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken O</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-34981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-34981</guid>
		<description>Crazy talk! Sounds good though. Next we&#039;ll be mixing bananas and OJ in a blender! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy talk! Sounds good though. Next we&#8217;ll be mixing bananas and OJ in a blender! <img src='http://c1gas2org.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don_brasco</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-12037</link>
		<dc:creator>Don_brasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-12037</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our dependence on OPEC could have been cut off at any time in the last40 years simply by using oil reserves that we have in our country. This would have also have provided jobs here and it would really not have changed the total exhaust from ICEs in the world.&quot;



This a fallacy. We don&#039;t  have the type of oil reserves that can meet our demand. It&#039;s just not true but is a common right wing talking point.



Now if they were actually serious about making electric cars 40 years ago then yes we wouldn&#039;t be dealing with opec today or fighting wars in countries we have no business being in.



The electric car has been around for more then 120 years. This is not some new phenomenon. Splitting the atom we can do but building better batteries for some reason is only getting better now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our dependence on OPEC could have been cut off at any time in the last40 years simply by using oil reserves that we have in our country. This would have also have provided jobs here and it would really not have changed the total exhaust from ICEs in the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>This a fallacy. We don&#8217;t  have the type of oil reserves that can meet our demand. It&#8217;s just not true but is a common right wing talking point.</p>
<p>Now if they were actually serious about making electric cars 40 years ago then yes we wouldn&#8217;t be dealing with opec today or fighting wars in countries we have no business being in.</p>
<p>The electric car has been around for more then 120 years. This is not some new phenomenon. Splitting the atom we can do but building better batteries for some reason is only getting better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don_brasco</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-34980</link>
		<dc:creator>Don_brasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-34980</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our dependence on OPEC could have been cut off at any time in the last40 years simply by using oil reserves that we have in our country. This would have also have provided jobs here and it would really not have changed the total exhaust from ICEs in the world.&quot;



This a fallacy. We don&#039;t  have the type of oil reserves that can meet our demand. It&#039;s just not true but is a common right wing talking point.



Now if they were actually serious about making electric cars 40 years ago then yes we wouldn&#039;t be dealing with opec today or fighting wars in countries we have no business being in.



The electric car has been around for more then 120 years. This is not some new phenomenon. Splitting the atom we can do but building better batteries for some reason is only getting better now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our dependence on OPEC could have been cut off at any time in the last40 years simply by using oil reserves that we have in our country. This would have also have provided jobs here and it would really not have changed the total exhaust from ICEs in the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>This a fallacy. We don&#8217;t  have the type of oil reserves that can meet our demand. It&#8217;s just not true but is a common right wing talking point.</p>
<p>Now if they were actually serious about making electric cars 40 years ago then yes we wouldn&#8217;t be dealing with opec today or fighting wars in countries we have no business being in.</p>
<p>The electric car has been around for more then 120 years. This is not some new phenomenon. Splitting the atom we can do but building better batteries for some reason is only getting better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/08/06/gasoline-diesel-cocktail-could-make-engines-cleaner-more-efficient/#comment-12036</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=3188#comment-12036</guid>
		<description>&quot;...most ICE engines have a thermal efficiency of just 25%.&quot;



I think most modern turbo diesels are in the 40% range now.

I had a TDi Jetta and got 49-55 mpg with gobs of power (On the highway, for example, I never needed to downshift to pass or

climb a big hill...once you&#039;re in the engine&#039;s sweet spot, it&#039;s like having a V8 under the hood).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;most ICE engines have a thermal efficiency of just 25%.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think most modern turbo diesels are in the 40% range now.</p>
<p>I had a TDi Jetta and got 49-55 mpg with gobs of power (On the highway, for example, I never needed to downshift to pass or</p>
<p>climb a big hill&#8230;once you&#8217;re in the engine&#8217;s sweet spot, it&#8217;s like having a V8 under the hood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

