The real reason we were in Warren, MI wasn’t to test-drive the Volt, but to be on hand for the grand opening of GM’s new battery testing facility. The $25 million Global Battery Systems lab is now the largest battery testing facility in the United States, and is four times larger than the company’s old lab.
GM made a strategic decision to keep battery development in-house, because it will likely be a key competitive advantage in the race to commercialize electric vehicles. The lab already employs 1,000 engineers who work on advanced battery systems like the one found the the Chevy Volt.
It was a full house on June 8th, with a large portion of the GM executive team on hand along with numerous state politicians, including new GM CEO Fritz Henderson and the Governor of Michigan Jennifer Granholm (audio quality = C-).
“The new global GM battery lab will benefit consumers across America by helping us advance the development of battery technology in the United States and put cleaner, more efficient vehicles on the road more quickly and affordably. Our new lab improves GM’s competitiveness by speeding the development of our hybrid, plug-in and extended-range electric vehicles.” -CEO Fritz Henderson
What GM is Doing in the New Battery Lab
The most important thing to understand about the facility is that GM is testing individual battery cells sourced from outside suppliers, and using those cells to build their own proprietary battery packs.
The Chevy Volt “battery pack”, as described in my last post, is made up of 200 individual Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery cells. GM is buying the battery cells in bulk from battery manufacturer LG Chem and putting it all together in-house.
-Volt T-shaped Battery Pack and Individual Lithium-ion Cell (in speaker’s hand).
Before settling on LG Chem, GM says it evaluated 155 types of batteries from 115 different suppliers. Basically, they sampled products from everyone in town, and then hit about 60 of those samples with stress and functionality tests to determine which had the best thermochemical and energy storage properties. GM claims that the LG Chem Lithium-ion battery cells that will be used in the Volt have the highest energy-density available.
-Old battery packs from the EV1 on display (bottom), along with Nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries (top) and new Volt Li-ion cell (middle). GM says the new Li-ion cells have twice the capacity of older NiMH batteries.
[...] the Chevy Volt. See also: 1. LiveBlogging from the opening of GM’s New Battery Lab and 3. Tour of GM’s New Battery Lab. Disclaimer: GM flew me out for this [...]
The battery lab is great, but the question of securing supplies of Lithium has been left to LG. China and Japan see it as a strategic national priority, and that’s a huge difference in approach. No secure Lithium supplies make Li-Ion powered electric cars eventually dependent on supplies controlled by other nations. That’s worse than the current problem with oil.
There’s an excellent chapter on this in David Sandalow’s new book “Plug-in Electric Vehicles.” From Chapter 6:
“Although shifting to HEVs, PHEVs, and AEVs will reduce U.S. demand for gasoline (and thus oil imports), it will not necessarily reduce U.S. import dependence. The strategic materials and rare earth elements critical to current designs for advanced vehicles are neither mined nor refined in the United States today; they too will have to be imported, in increasing volumes. Depending on which battery chemistries and power train configurations achieve substantial market penetration, this new import dependence may be quite extreme. In the case of certain materials–for example, cobalt and neodymium–rapid penetration of the U.S. light-duty vehicle market by HEVs, PHEVs, and AEVs could lead to extensive reliance on supplier countries whose governments are fragile and unstable or overtly hostile to the United States.”
[...] several colleges and universities, as well as major corporations, including, Johnson Controls, General Motors, Honeywell, BASF, Smith Electric Vehicles, Ford and [...]
@Clayton B. Cornwell Thanks for the reference, it makes the point really well. I went on to write an article over at evworld.com, called ‘The Return Of The Electric Car,’ which looks at some more of the practical problems EV’s will face.
Tell us what you think:
Welcome to ...
Gas 2.0
Gas 2.0 digs into the viscous world of biofuels and the fast-paced transit arena, exploring the technologies and substances that are the future of transportation.
[...] the Chevy Volt. See also: 1. LiveBlogging from the opening of GM’s New Battery Lab and 3. Tour of GM’s New Battery Lab. Disclaimer: GM flew me out for this [...]
The battery lab is great, but the question of securing supplies of Lithium has been left to LG. China and Japan see it as a strategic national priority, and that’s a huge difference in approach. No secure Lithium supplies make Li-Ion powered electric cars eventually dependent on supplies controlled by other nations. That’s worse than the current problem with oil.
@Graham: You bring up an extremely good point.
There’s an excellent chapter on this in David Sandalow’s new book “Plug-in Electric Vehicles.” From Chapter 6:
“Although shifting to HEVs, PHEVs, and AEVs will reduce U.S. demand for gasoline (and thus oil imports), it will not necessarily reduce U.S. import dependence. The strategic materials and rare earth elements critical to current designs for advanced vehicles are neither mined nor refined in the United States today; they too will have to be imported, in increasing volumes. Depending on which battery chemistries and power train configurations achieve substantial market penetration, this new import dependence may be quite extreme. In the case of certain materials–for example, cobalt and neodymium–rapid penetration of the U.S. light-duty vehicle market by HEVs, PHEVs, and AEVs could lead to extensive reliance on supplier countries whose governments are fragile and unstable or overtly hostile to the United States.”
bolivia owns 1/2 world lithium; learn spanish and occupy it now.
[...] several colleges and universities, as well as major corporations, including, Johnson Controls, General Motors, Honeywell, BASF, Smith Electric Vehicles, Ford and [...]
@Clayton B. Cornwell Thanks for the reference, it makes the point really well. I went on to write an article over at evworld.com, called ‘The Return Of The Electric Car,’ which looks at some more of the practical problems EV’s will face.