http://gas2.org/2009/06/17/gm-could-cut-fuel-cell-development/ What is the future of fuel? What's new? What's next? Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction. Sat, 26 May 2012 14:59:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://gas2.org/2009/06/17/gm-could-cut-fuel-cell-development/#comment-10036 Dave Tyler Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:49:46 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2654#comment-10036 Alan, please note the updated version, based on the changes the Democrat and Chronicle made. Alan, please note the updated version, based on the changes the Democrat and Chronicle made.

]]> http://gas2.org/2009/06/17/gm-could-cut-fuel-cell-development/#comment-10035 Alan Adler Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:06:05 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2654#comment-10035 I work in Fuel Cell communications for GM and the story picked up from the Rochester newspaper takes a couple of separate elements from Fritz Henderson's Tweet chat and creates unwarranted speculation around the future of fuel cell vehicle efforts at GM. Fritz never tied upcoming headcount reduction at GM and any plans for fuel cell efforts together. His comment that fuel cell commercialization is a ways off is consistent with what we have been saying all along. But to get people spun up by combining two elements with no direct connection is sloppy and sensationalistic reporting. I work in Fuel Cell communications for GM and the story picked up from the Rochester newspaper takes a couple of separate elements from Fritz Henderson’s Tweet chat and creates unwarranted speculation around the future of fuel cell vehicle efforts at GM. Fritz never tied upcoming headcount reduction at GM and any plans for fuel cell efforts together. His comment that fuel cell commercialization is a ways off is consistent with what we have been saying all along. But to get people spun up by combining two elements with no direct connection is sloppy and sensationalistic reporting.

]]> http://gas2.org/2009/06/17/gm-could-cut-fuel-cell-development/#comment-32760 Alan Adler Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:06:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2654#comment-32760 I work in Fuel Cell communications for GM and the story picked up from the Rochester newspaper takes a couple of separate elements from Fritz Henderson's Tweet chat and creates unwarranted speculation around the future of fuel cell vehicle efforts at GM. Fritz never tied upcoming headcount reduction at GM and any plans for fuel cell efforts together. His comment that fuel cell commercialization is a ways off is consistent with what we have been saying all along. But to get people spun up by combining two elements with no direct connection is sloppy and sensationalistic reporting. I work in Fuel Cell communications for GM and the story picked up from the Rochester newspaper takes a couple of separate elements from Fritz Henderson’s Tweet chat and creates unwarranted speculation around the future of fuel cell vehicle efforts at GM. Fritz never tied upcoming headcount reduction at GM and any plans for fuel cell efforts together. His comment that fuel cell commercialization is a ways off is consistent with what we have been saying all along. But to get people spun up by combining two elements with no direct connection is sloppy and sensationalistic reporting.

]]>