<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Fuel Economy Standards are Not Counterproductive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge Electric Semi Would Transform Trucking : Gas 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9671</link>
		<dc:creator>Huge Electric Semi Would Transform Trucking : Gas 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9671</guid>
		<description>[...] the HST, or the Highly Sophisticated Transporter, and this is no hyperbole: Quite apart from being the most fuel-efficient way to haul goods on the highway, this highly computerized EV would turn the drivers job into a white collar job more akin to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the HST, or the Highly Sophisticated Transporter, and this is no hyperbole: Quite apart from being the most fuel-efficient way to haul goods on the highway, this highly computerized EV would turn the drivers job into a white collar job more akin to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetta TDI Throws Down with the Prius : Gas 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetta TDI Throws Down with the Prius : Gas 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9670</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187; See also: New Fuel Economy Standards are Not Counterproductive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &raquo; See also: New Fuel Economy Standards are Not Counterproductive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMcA</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9669</link>
		<dc:creator>AMcA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9669</guid>
		<description>Economists?  Obviously a bunch of morons.



Climate scientists?  Utter geniuses.  Infallable.  (At least as long as they&#039;re predicting warming.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists?  Obviously a bunch of morons.</p>
<p>Climate scientists?  Utter geniuses.  Infallable.  (At least as long as they&#8217;re predicting warming.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMcA</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-32403</link>
		<dc:creator>AMcA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-32403</guid>
		<description>Economists?  Obviously a bunch of morons.



Climate scientists?  Utter geniuses.  Infallable.  (At least as long as they&#039;re predicting warming.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists?  Obviously a bunch of morons.</p>
<p>Climate scientists?  Utter geniuses.  Infallable.  (At least as long as they&#8217;re predicting warming.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Diez</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9668</link>
		<dc:creator>David Diez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 05:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9668</guid>
		<description>&quot;Holding on to your old car longer is good for the environment&quot;



Not always.



http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs



Sometimes it is smarter to use new and more efficient technology instead of making old products last (and pollute) as long as possible. Would you not want to shut down high-pollution coal plants that are already built in favor of renewable energy sources? Sure, if the improvements are very minor then make the older goods last longer. But in many cases, scrapping old cars or old technology in favor of new goods is a wise move and does in fact reduce emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Holding on to your old car longer is good for the environment&#8221;</p>
<p>Not always.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs" rel="nofollow">http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs</a></p>
<p>Sometimes it is smarter to use new and more efficient technology instead of making old products last (and pollute) as long as possible. Would you not want to shut down high-pollution coal plants that are already built in favor of renewable energy sources? Sure, if the improvements are very minor then make the older goods last longer. But in many cases, scrapping old cars or old technology in favor of new goods is a wise move and does in fact reduce emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Diez</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-32402</link>
		<dc:creator>David Diez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-32402</guid>
		<description>&quot;Holding on to your old car longer is good for the environment&quot;



Not always.



http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs



Sometimes it is smarter to use new and more efficient technology instead of making old products last (and pollute) as long as possible. Would you not want to shut down high-pollution coal plants that are already built in favor of renewable energy sources? Sure, if the improvements are very minor then make the older goods last longer. But in many cases, scrapping old cars or old technology in favor of new goods is a wise move and does in fact reduce emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Holding on to your old car longer is good for the environment&#8221;</p>
<p>Not always.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs" rel="nofollow">http://www.statgrad.com/abou/commentary.php#new-car-costs</a></p>
<p>Sometimes it is smarter to use new and more efficient technology instead of making old products last (and pollute) as long as possible. Would you not want to shut down high-pollution coal plants that are already built in favor of renewable energy sources? Sure, if the improvements are very minor then make the older goods last longer. But in many cases, scrapping old cars or old technology in favor of new goods is a wise move and does in fact reduce emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mkkby</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9667</link>
		<dc:creator>Mkkby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9667</guid>
		<description>Several key points are missing here:



3.  Obama&#039;s CAFE standards are misguided because as we consume less gas the price goes down and people will once again demand larger cars.  The better way to regulate this is to use taxes to keep prices high.  If oil stayed at $150+ for the long term, all kinds of good things happen.  People would voluntarily switch to fuel efficient cars.  They would insulate their houses.  And our tech geniuses would find all kinds of ways to exploit renewables.  No policing, no bureaucracy, just good clean market forces.



I would argue the entire problem with fossil fuels is the price is so low that we waste it.



2.  Miles driven is down the last 2 years mainly because of the recession.  Many people in large cities, myself included, have seen a noticeable drop in highway traffic.



3.  This is also the reason why the price of every fossil fuel is down.  There is such a glut of natural gas right now, there is nowhere left to store it. I can cite this, but you have a search button too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several key points are missing here:</p>
<p>3.  Obama&#8217;s CAFE standards are misguided because as we consume less gas the price goes down and people will once again demand larger cars.  The better way to regulate this is to use taxes to keep prices high.  If oil stayed at $150+ for the long term, all kinds of good things happen.  People would voluntarily switch to fuel efficient cars.  They would insulate their houses.  And our tech geniuses would find all kinds of ways to exploit renewables.  No policing, no bureaucracy, just good clean market forces.</p>
<p>I would argue the entire problem with fossil fuels is the price is so low that we waste it.</p>
<p>2.  Miles driven is down the last 2 years mainly because of the recession.  Many people in large cities, myself included, have seen a noticeable drop in highway traffic.</p>
<p>3.  This is also the reason why the price of every fossil fuel is down.  There is such a glut of natural gas right now, there is nowhere left to store it. I can cite this, but you have a search button too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mkkby</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-32401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mkkby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-32401</guid>
		<description>Several key points are missing here:



3.  Obama&#039;s CAFE standards are misguided because as we consume less gas the price goes down and people will once again demand larger cars.  The better way to regulate this is to use taxes to keep prices high.  If oil stayed at $150+ for the long term, all kinds of good things happen.  People would voluntarily switch to fuel efficient cars.  They would insulate their houses.  And our tech geniuses would find all kinds of ways to exploit renewables.  No policing, no bureaucracy, just good clean market forces.



I would argue the entire problem with fossil fuels is the price is so low that we waste it.



2.  Miles driven is down the last 2 years mainly because of the recession.  Many people in large cities, myself included, have seen a noticeable drop in highway traffic.



3.  This is also the reason why the price of every fossil fuel is down.  There is such a glut of natural gas right now, there is nowhere left to store it. I can cite this, but you have a search button too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several key points are missing here:</p>
<p>3.  Obama&#8217;s CAFE standards are misguided because as we consume less gas the price goes down and people will once again demand larger cars.  The better way to regulate this is to use taxes to keep prices high.  If oil stayed at $150+ for the long term, all kinds of good things happen.  People would voluntarily switch to fuel efficient cars.  They would insulate their houses.  And our tech geniuses would find all kinds of ways to exploit renewables.  No policing, no bureaucracy, just good clean market forces.</p>
<p>I would argue the entire problem with fossil fuels is the price is so low that we waste it.</p>
<p>2.  Miles driven is down the last 2 years mainly because of the recession.  Many people in large cities, myself included, have seen a noticeable drop in highway traffic.</p>
<p>3.  This is also the reason why the price of every fossil fuel is down.  There is such a glut of natural gas right now, there is nowhere left to store it. I can cite this, but you have a search button too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-9666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-9666</guid>
		<description>I believe that what ever any one thinks or predicts will happen is based on old habbits and technologies and is basicly flawed. With the new electric vehicle that are in fact on their way it will not matter how much any one may or may not choose to drive. As to what ever number one wants ti use for added costs one only need to look back at the computer or digital technologies and how pricy they were and look now. The bottom line now is they are quite reasonable and there production cost savings is gigantic. Going down the road we are now traveling on has already given rise to many companies that are even now producing the first great advances in green tecnologies. Magnacoaster Motor Company, Raser Technologies, Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc. and there are many more these are real companies doing what some believe to be bull crap. It&#039;s coming and by the way they are already discussing charging you based on miles driven. My opion green is going to happen a lot quicker than some may believe possible and when the real green explosion occurs I will be very thankfull no matter what the initial costs. As to goverment and their taxes well they will always have their hand on your wallet and take what ever they want the real answer to that is play their game have two wallets. Here is another good informatioal sourse http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that what ever any one thinks or predicts will happen is based on old habbits and technologies and is basicly flawed. With the new electric vehicle that are in fact on their way it will not matter how much any one may or may not choose to drive. As to what ever number one wants ti use for added costs one only need to look back at the computer or digital technologies and how pricy they were and look now. The bottom line now is they are quite reasonable and there production cost savings is gigantic. Going down the road we are now traveling on has already given rise to many companies that are even now producing the first great advances in green tecnologies. Magnacoaster Motor Company, Raser Technologies, Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc. and there are many more these are real companies doing what some believe to be bull crap. It&#8217;s coming and by the way they are already discussing charging you based on miles driven. My opion green is going to happen a lot quicker than some may believe possible and when the real green explosion occurs I will be very thankfull no matter what the initial costs. As to goverment and their taxes well they will always have their hand on your wallet and take what ever they want the real answer to that is play their game have two wallets. Here is another good informatioal sourse <a href="http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/21/new-fuel-economy-standards-are-not-counterproductive/#comment-32400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2426#comment-32400</guid>
		<description>I believe that what ever any one thinks or predicts will happen is based on old habbits and technologies and is basicly flawed. With the new electric vehicle that are in fact on their way it will not matter how much any one may or may not choose to drive. As to what ever number one wants ti use for added costs one only need to look back at the computer or digital technologies and how pricy they were and look now. The bottom line now is they are quite reasonable and there production cost savings is gigantic. Going down the road we are now traveling on has already given rise to many companies that are even now producing the first great advances in green tecnologies. Magnacoaster Motor Company, Raser Technologies, Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc. and there are many more these are real companies doing what some believe to be bull crap. It&#039;s coming and by the way they are already discussing charging you based on miles driven. My opion green is going to happen a lot quicker than some may believe possible and when the real green explosion occurs I will be very thankfull no matter what the initial costs. As to goverment and their taxes well they will always have their hand on your wallet and take what ever they want the real answer to that is play their game have two wallets. Here is another good informatioal sourse http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that what ever any one thinks or predicts will happen is based on old habbits and technologies and is basicly flawed. With the new electric vehicle that are in fact on their way it will not matter how much any one may or may not choose to drive. As to what ever number one wants ti use for added costs one only need to look back at the computer or digital technologies and how pricy they were and look now. The bottom line now is they are quite reasonable and there production cost savings is gigantic. Going down the road we are now traveling on has already given rise to many companies that are even now producing the first great advances in green tecnologies. Magnacoaster Motor Company, Raser Technologies, Hydrogen Technology Applications Inc. and there are many more these are real companies doing what some believe to be bull crap. It&#8217;s coming and by the way they are already discussing charging you based on miles driven. My opion green is going to happen a lot quicker than some may believe possible and when the real green explosion occurs I will be very thankfull no matter what the initial costs. As to goverment and their taxes well they will always have their hand on your wallet and take what ever they want the real answer to that is play their game have two wallets. Here is another good informatioal sourse <a href="http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/03/26/454807.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

