<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama: $800 Million for Biofuels and Flex-Fuel Vehicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Fuels Foundation Launches Florida FFV Awareness Project : Gas 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-9457</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Fuels Foundation Launches Florida FFV Awareness Project : Gas 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-9457</guid>
		<description>[...] national consumer awareness campaign aimed at owners of flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) was officially launched in Orlando, Florida today at the Farm-to-Fuel Summit. The project is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] national consumer awareness campaign aimed at owners of flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) was officially launched in Orlando, Florida today at the Farm-to-Fuel Summit. The project is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Ways the Climate Bill Will Change Your Life : Gas 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Ways the Climate Bill Will Change Your Life : Gas 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturday during his weekly radio address, President Obama put pressure on the Senate to pass the legislation. &#8220;Now my call to every senator; as well as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturday during his weekly radio address, President Obama put pressure on the Senate to pass the legislation. &#8220;Now my call to every senator; as well as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-9455</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-9455</guid>
		<description>Obama is wrong. Biofuels are a great idea, but Obama&#039;s choice of funding methods is just plain wrong.



Grants to do anything in any specified way lock out other and possibly better methods that do not have the subsidy. it is not difficult though to provide a tax fund free subsidy to all possible competitors in this or any other business development. The correct method is a tax moratorium for the business that is working on/producing the desired product.



By eliminating government cash subsidies, the business is free to use what they think is the best way. They are not obligated to use amethod that they have determined is not efficient just to get the subsidy. The result is more jobs, which pay income taxes and property taxes, either directly from the workers own homes of from their landlords. Many counties in this country use this method of attracting businesses effectively. It works.



Obama&#039;s problem is that it doesn&#039;t allow him to control the business. With his total lack of successful executive experience, and his proven failures so far, I see this independence from government control as a positive thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is wrong. Biofuels are a great idea, but Obama&#8217;s choice of funding methods is just plain wrong.</p>
<p>Grants to do anything in any specified way lock out other and possibly better methods that do not have the subsidy. it is not difficult though to provide a tax fund free subsidy to all possible competitors in this or any other business development. The correct method is a tax moratorium for the business that is working on/producing the desired product.</p>
<p>By eliminating government cash subsidies, the business is free to use what they think is the best way. They are not obligated to use amethod that they have determined is not efficient just to get the subsidy. The result is more jobs, which pay income taxes and property taxes, either directly from the workers own homes of from their landlords. Many counties in this country use this method of attracting businesses effectively. It works.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s problem is that it doesn&#8217;t allow him to control the business. With his total lack of successful executive experience, and his proven failures so far, I see this independence from government control as a positive thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-32218</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-32218</guid>
		<description>Obama is wrong. Biofuels are a great idea, but Obama&#039;s choice of funding methods is just plain wrong.



Grants to do anything in any specified way lock out other and possibly better methods that do not have the subsidy. it is not difficult though to provide a tax fund free subsidy to all possible competitors in this or any other business development. The correct method is a tax moratorium for the business that is working on/producing the desired product.



By eliminating government cash subsidies, the business is free to use what they think is the best way. They are not obligated to use amethod that they have determined is not efficient just to get the subsidy. The result is more jobs, which pay income taxes and property taxes, either directly from the workers own homes of from their landlords. Many counties in this country use this method of attracting businesses effectively. It works.



Obama&#039;s problem is that it doesn&#039;t allow him to control the business. With his total lack of successful executive experience, and his proven failures so far, I see this independence from government control as a positive thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is wrong. Biofuels are a great idea, but Obama&#8217;s choice of funding methods is just plain wrong.</p>
<p>Grants to do anything in any specified way lock out other and possibly better methods that do not have the subsidy. it is not difficult though to provide a tax fund free subsidy to all possible competitors in this or any other business development. The correct method is a tax moratorium for the business that is working on/producing the desired product.</p>
<p>By eliminating government cash subsidies, the business is free to use what they think is the best way. They are not obligated to use amethod that they have determined is not efficient just to get the subsidy. The result is more jobs, which pay income taxes and property taxes, either directly from the workers own homes of from their landlords. Many counties in this country use this method of attracting businesses effectively. It works.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s problem is that it doesn&#8217;t allow him to control the business. With his total lack of successful executive experience, and his proven failures so far, I see this independence from government control as a positive thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-9454</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-9454</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem that I see is that Obama is maintaining government control just like all other Fascists. If the idea is to get the biofuel into production then just absolve the producers from taxes for up to 10 years. That incentive would do much better than an incompetent government agency running things. And it would cost a whole lot less, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem that I see is that Obama is maintaining government control just like all other Fascists. If the idea is to get the biofuel into production then just absolve the producers from taxes for up to 10 years. That incentive would do much better than an incompetent government agency running things. And it would cost a whole lot less, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-32217</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-32217</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem that I see is that Obama is maintaining government control just like all other Fascists. If the idea is to get the biofuel into production then just absolve the producers from taxes for up to 10 years. That incentive would do much better than an incompetent government agency running things. And it would cost a whole lot less, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem that I see is that Obama is maintaining government control just like all other Fascists. If the idea is to get the biofuel into production then just absolve the producers from taxes for up to 10 years. That incentive would do much better than an incompetent government agency running things. And it would cost a whole lot less, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Finley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-9453</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Finley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-9453</guid>
		<description>I would rephrase the following:



&quot;...So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to save us from destruction due to fossil fuel use?...&quot;



to something like,



&quot;...So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to increase the destruction of food based biofuels?...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rephrase the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to save us from destruction due to fossil fuel use?&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>to something like,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to increase the destruction of food based biofuels?&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Finley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comment-32216</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Finley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=2337#comment-32216</guid>
		<description>I would rephrase the following:



&quot;...So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to save us from destruction due to fossil fuel use?...&quot;



to something like,



&quot;...So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to increase the destruction of food based biofuels?...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rephrase the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to save us from destruction due to fossil fuel use?&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>to something like,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;So what are the latest and greatest ways the new agency will utilize to increase the destruction of food based biofuels?&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

