Comments on: GM Recalls Hummer H3T Because Gas Tank Could Fall Off http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/ What is the future of fuel? What's new? What's next? Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction. Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Allch Chcar http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-8694 Allch Chcar Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:09:04 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-8694 This sounds like a major deal, but it isn't. It's just another recall before it became a problem. Now the "throttlebody" recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened. Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle's overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak. While we're at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don't they know what salt does to a car!? Now that's something worth ranting about. This sounds like a major deal, but it isn’t. It’s just another recall before it became a problem. Now the “throttlebody” recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened.

Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle’s overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak.

While we’re at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don’t they know what salt does to a car!?

Now that’s something worth ranting about.

]]> By: Allch Chcar http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31154 Allch Chcar Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:09:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31154 This sounds like a major deal, but it isn't. It's just another recall before it became a problem. Now the "throttlebody" recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened. Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle's overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak. While we're at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don't they know what salt does to a car!? Now that's something worth ranting about. This sounds like a major deal, but it isn’t. It’s just another recall before it became a problem. Now the “throttlebody” recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened.

Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle’s overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak.

While we’re at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don’t they know what salt does to a car!?

Now that’s something worth ranting about.

]]> By: Allch Chcar http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31155 Allch Chcar Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:09:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31155 This sounds like a major deal, but it isn't. It's just another recall before it became a problem. Now the "throttlebody" recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened. Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle's overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak. While we're at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don't they know what salt does to a car!? Now that's something worth ranting about. This sounds like a major deal, but it isn’t. It’s just another recall before it became a problem. Now the “throttlebody” recall on the Ford Victoria was a big deal, someone actually got hurt before that happened.

Sounds like hating on the HUMMER. Waste of time if you ask me. The gas tank strap has nothing to do with the vehicle’s overall design other than the tiny detail about the huge fuel tank. Although I do notice the attempt at the aerodynamic Kammback, the picture is ruined by the huge kayak.

While we’re at it, now I could rant about this, who would park their vehicle THAT close to the water. They must be crazy if they think that inspires buyers. Don’t they know what salt does to a car!?

Now that’s something worth ranting about.

]]> By: jpm100 http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-8693 jpm100 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:21:21 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-8693 1700 units is not really news. 1700 units is not really news.

]]> By: jpm100 http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31152 jpm100 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:21:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31152 1700 units is not really news. 1700 units is not really news.

]]> By: jpm100 http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31153 jpm100 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:21:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31153 1700 units is not really news. 1700 units is not really news.

]]> By: Jack Daniels http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-8692 Jack Daniels Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:49:56 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-8692 GM ought to fire the engineer who is responsible for this problem! I don't think there's any excuse for this one. GM ought to fire the engineer who is responsible for this problem! I don’t think there’s any excuse for this one.

]]> By: Jack Daniels http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31151 Jack Daniels Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:49:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31151 GM ought to fire the engineer who is responsible for this problem! I don't think there's any excuse for this one. GM ought to fire the engineer who is responsible for this problem! I don’t think there’s any excuse for this one.

]]> By: Bob Williams http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-8691 Bob Williams Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:57:47 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-8691 "An American Revolution" “An American Revolution”

]]> By: Bob Williams http://gas2.org/2009/03/15/gm-recalls-hummer-h3t-because-gas-tanks-could-fall-off/#comment-31149 Bob Williams Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:57:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=2003#comment-31149 "An American Revolution" “An American Revolution”

]]>