<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Opinion): The Next &quot;Green&quot; Problem: Paying for Highway Construction and Repair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-8623</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-8623</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it matters where and how much taxes are charged for potholes or anything else that needs fixing.  Some of that money will be &quot;redirected&quot; to the Olympic funding because that is the only thing Mayor Daley really cares about.  That is his legacy and once the Olympics are done (if Chicago wins the bid), I bet Daley would care less what happens to the city.  Where is the money that the city has collected in past tax raises? Seems Chicagoans pay more every year but the services seem to become more lax every year. Why doesn&#039;t Daley remove those planters from the middle of the road and instead, fix the potholes? Besides, I&#039;d hate to be in dire need of an ambulance in the middle of rush hour because those planters prevent emergency vehicles from getting to their destinations on time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it matters where and how much taxes are charged for potholes or anything else that needs fixing.  Some of that money will be &#8220;redirected&#8221; to the Olympic funding because that is the only thing Mayor Daley really cares about.  That is his legacy and once the Olympics are done (if Chicago wins the bid), I bet Daley would care less what happens to the city.  Where is the money that the city has collected in past tax raises? Seems Chicagoans pay more every year but the services seem to become more lax every year. Why doesn&#8217;t Daley remove those planters from the middle of the road and instead, fix the potholes? Besides, I&#8217;d hate to be in dire need of an ambulance in the middle of rush hour because those planters prevent emergency vehicles from getting to their destinations on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-31210</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-31210</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it matters where and how much taxes are charged for potholes or anything else that needs fixing.  Some of that money will be &quot;redirected&quot; to the Olympic funding because that is the only thing Mayor Daley really cares about.  That is his legacy and once the Olympics are done (if Chicago wins the bid), I bet Daley would care less what happens to the city.  Where is the money that the city has collected in past tax raises? Seems Chicagoans pay more every year but the services seem to become more lax every year. Why doesn&#039;t Daley remove those planters from the middle of the road and instead, fix the potholes? Besides, I&#039;d hate to be in dire need of an ambulance in the middle of rush hour because those planters prevent emergency vehicles from getting to their destinations on time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it matters where and how much taxes are charged for potholes or anything else that needs fixing.  Some of that money will be &#8220;redirected&#8221; to the Olympic funding because that is the only thing Mayor Daley really cares about.  That is his legacy and once the Olympics are done (if Chicago wins the bid), I bet Daley would care less what happens to the city.  Where is the money that the city has collected in past tax raises? Seems Chicagoans pay more every year but the services seem to become more lax every year. Why doesn&#8217;t Daley remove those planters from the middle of the road and instead, fix the potholes? Besides, I&#8217;d hate to be in dire need of an ambulance in the middle of rush hour because those planters prevent emergency vehicles from getting to their destinations on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-8622</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-8622</guid>
		<description>When you really get down to it there is only one source of  money that is taxed, PERSONAL INCOME. Any tax placed onto any other source is just a cost that is passed on to the ultimate buyer.



Sales taxes are visible. They are added to the purchase price of the product at the time of sale so that the buyer sees them. Inventory taxes, or value added taxes, are hidden in that they become part of the cost of the material that becomes the retail sale item. These taxes are marked up with the profit margin and then taxed again when the final sale is made.



By revoking taxes on anything except income, we would immediately see just how much money is going to taxes, and we would also greatly reduce the cost of producing goods. To insure the fairest prices, we would allow an &quot;Excess Profits Tax&quot; to be placed on profits above a predetermined net fair profit margin. To insure against ridiculous salaries for top executives, we could set a maximum differential between minimum wage and maximum wage in any company. Any wages above the maximum would not be accountable as costs but must be considered as profits subject to the excess profits tax. This would not prevent these huge salaries from being paid. It would simply prevent them from being considered as legitimate business expenses and therefore costs.



There is always going to be a proponent of “targeted” taxes for a special purpose. It is sometimes very difficult to see that these taxes hurt all of us because they increase the cost of something that we desire. An example is a “road use tax” assessed on trucks because trucks increase the maintenance costs of roadways. So let&#039;s just tax trucks to pay these costs. But it doesn&#039;t really work that way. The “truck taxes” are incorporated into the costs of the goods that are transported and we pay it in higher prices.



You might find that a flat income tax with a single exemption which should, in my opinion be equal to the minimum wage or the Social Security “retirement benefit” which should be the same amount would allow people enough discretion for them to choose the environmentally sound product.



In any event, products manufactured in the U. S. without the imposition of taxes, would greatly improve our export position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you really get down to it there is only one source of  money that is taxed, PERSONAL INCOME. Any tax placed onto any other source is just a cost that is passed on to the ultimate buyer.</p>
<p>Sales taxes are visible. They are added to the purchase price of the product at the time of sale so that the buyer sees them. Inventory taxes, or value added taxes, are hidden in that they become part of the cost of the material that becomes the retail sale item. These taxes are marked up with the profit margin and then taxed again when the final sale is made.</p>
<p>By revoking taxes on anything except income, we would immediately see just how much money is going to taxes, and we would also greatly reduce the cost of producing goods. To insure the fairest prices, we would allow an &#8220;Excess Profits Tax&#8221; to be placed on profits above a predetermined net fair profit margin. To insure against ridiculous salaries for top executives, we could set a maximum differential between minimum wage and maximum wage in any company. Any wages above the maximum would not be accountable as costs but must be considered as profits subject to the excess profits tax. This would not prevent these huge salaries from being paid. It would simply prevent them from being considered as legitimate business expenses and therefore costs.</p>
<p>There is always going to be a proponent of “targeted” taxes for a special purpose. It is sometimes very difficult to see that these taxes hurt all of us because they increase the cost of something that we desire. An example is a “road use tax” assessed on trucks because trucks increase the maintenance costs of roadways. So let&#8217;s just tax trucks to pay these costs. But it doesn&#8217;t really work that way. The “truck taxes” are incorporated into the costs of the goods that are transported and we pay it in higher prices.</p>
<p>You might find that a flat income tax with a single exemption which should, in my opinion be equal to the minimum wage or the Social Security “retirement benefit” which should be the same amount would allow people enough discretion for them to choose the environmentally sound product.</p>
<p>In any event, products manufactured in the U. S. without the imposition of taxes, would greatly improve our export position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckL</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-31209</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-31209</guid>
		<description>When you really get down to it there is only one source of  money that is taxed, PERSONAL INCOME. Any tax placed onto any other source is just a cost that is passed on to the ultimate buyer.



Sales taxes are visible. They are added to the purchase price of the product at the time of sale so that the buyer sees them. Inventory taxes, or value added taxes, are hidden in that they become part of the cost of the material that becomes the retail sale item. These taxes are marked up with the profit margin and then taxed again when the final sale is made.



By revoking taxes on anything except income, we would immediately see just how much money is going to taxes, and we would also greatly reduce the cost of producing goods. To insure the fairest prices, we would allow an &quot;Excess Profits Tax&quot; to be placed on profits above a predetermined net fair profit margin. To insure against ridiculous salaries for top executives, we could set a maximum differential between minimum wage and maximum wage in any company. Any wages above the maximum would not be accountable as costs but must be considered as profits subject to the excess profits tax. This would not prevent these huge salaries from being paid. It would simply prevent them from being considered as legitimate business expenses and therefore costs.



There is always going to be a proponent of “targeted” taxes for a special purpose. It is sometimes very difficult to see that these taxes hurt all of us because they increase the cost of something that we desire. An example is a “road use tax” assessed on trucks because trucks increase the maintenance costs of roadways. So let&#039;s just tax trucks to pay these costs. But it doesn&#039;t really work that way. The “truck taxes” are incorporated into the costs of the goods that are transported and we pay it in higher prices.



You might find that a flat income tax with a single exemption which should, in my opinion be equal to the minimum wage or the Social Security “retirement benefit” which should be the same amount would allow people enough discretion for them to choose the environmentally sound product.



In any event, products manufactured in the U. S. without the imposition of taxes, would greatly improve our export position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you really get down to it there is only one source of  money that is taxed, PERSONAL INCOME. Any tax placed onto any other source is just a cost that is passed on to the ultimate buyer.</p>
<p>Sales taxes are visible. They are added to the purchase price of the product at the time of sale so that the buyer sees them. Inventory taxes, or value added taxes, are hidden in that they become part of the cost of the material that becomes the retail sale item. These taxes are marked up with the profit margin and then taxed again when the final sale is made.</p>
<p>By revoking taxes on anything except income, we would immediately see just how much money is going to taxes, and we would also greatly reduce the cost of producing goods. To insure the fairest prices, we would allow an &#8220;Excess Profits Tax&#8221; to be placed on profits above a predetermined net fair profit margin. To insure against ridiculous salaries for top executives, we could set a maximum differential between minimum wage and maximum wage in any company. Any wages above the maximum would not be accountable as costs but must be considered as profits subject to the excess profits tax. This would not prevent these huge salaries from being paid. It would simply prevent them from being considered as legitimate business expenses and therefore costs.</p>
<p>There is always going to be a proponent of “targeted” taxes for a special purpose. It is sometimes very difficult to see that these taxes hurt all of us because they increase the cost of something that we desire. An example is a “road use tax” assessed on trucks because trucks increase the maintenance costs of roadways. So let&#8217;s just tax trucks to pay these costs. But it doesn&#8217;t really work that way. The “truck taxes” are incorporated into the costs of the goods that are transported and we pay it in higher prices.</p>
<p>You might find that a flat income tax with a single exemption which should, in my opinion be equal to the minimum wage or the Social Security “retirement benefit” which should be the same amount would allow people enough discretion for them to choose the environmentally sound product.</p>
<p>In any event, products manufactured in the U. S. without the imposition of taxes, would greatly improve our export position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-8621</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-8621</guid>
		<description>I have a better idea. Instead of raising taxes, how about we force the states to use the money more effectively. There is not enough accountability in the distribution of government money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a better idea. Instead of raising taxes, how about we force the states to use the money more effectively. There is not enough accountability in the distribution of government money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-31208</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-31208</guid>
		<description>I have a better idea. Instead of raising taxes, how about we force the states to use the money more effectively. There is not enough accountability in the distribution of government money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a better idea. Instead of raising taxes, how about we force the states to use the money more effectively. There is not enough accountability in the distribution of government money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-8620</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-8620</guid>
		<description>That last 5) should be a 6), of course...wish there was an edit button....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last 5) should be a 6), of course&#8230;wish there was an edit button&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-31207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-31207</guid>
		<description>That last 5) should be a 6), of course...wish there was an edit button....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last 5) should be a 6), of course&#8230;wish there was an edit button&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-8619</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-8619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty libertarian (e.g. I voted for Ron Paul), but the gas tax is actually one of the fairest taxes

in the system, IMHO, and I&#039;d like to see a portion of the income tax and/or payroll tax shifted to the gas tax.



Think about it, a higher gas tax (and lower income/payroll tax) would:

1) discourage wasteful driving

2) encourage fuel efficiency

3) encourage mass transit

4) encourage employment (more bring-home pay)

5) result in less power to (and therefore, fear of) the IRS

5) enable fair ways for the taxed to minimize their tax rate (e.g. walk, ride bike, live closer to work,

etc.)



I realize this would have a cascade effect of making all consumer goods cost more, but everyone would have more money in their paychecks to afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty libertarian (e.g. I voted for Ron Paul), but the gas tax is actually one of the fairest taxes</p>
<p>in the system, IMHO, and I&#8217;d like to see a portion of the income tax and/or payroll tax shifted to the gas tax.</p>
<p>Think about it, a higher gas tax (and lower income/payroll tax) would:</p>
<p>1) discourage wasteful driving</p>
<p>2) encourage fuel efficiency</p>
<p>3) encourage mass transit</p>
<p>4) encourage employment (more bring-home pay)</p>
<p>5) result in less power to (and therefore, fear of) the IRS</p>
<p>5) enable fair ways for the taxed to minimize their tax rate (e.g. walk, ride bike, live closer to work,</p>
<p>etc.)</p>
<p>I realize this would have a cascade effect of making all consumer goods cost more, but everyone would have more money in their paychecks to afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cleland</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/03/09/the-next-green-problem-paying-for-highway-construction-and-repair/#comment-31206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1909#comment-31206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty libertarian (e.g. I voted for Ron Paul), but the gas tax is actually one of the fairest taxes

in the system, IMHO, and I&#039;d like to see a portion of the income tax and/or payroll tax shifted to the gas tax.



Think about it, a higher gas tax (and lower income/payroll tax) would:

1) discourage wasteful driving

2) encourage fuel efficiency

3) encourage mass transit

4) encourage employment (more bring-home pay)

5) result in less power to (and therefore, fear of) the IRS

5) enable fair ways for the taxed to minimize their tax rate (e.g. walk, ride bike, live closer to work,

etc.)



I realize this would have a cascade effect of making all consumer goods cost more, but everyone would have more money in their paychecks to afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty libertarian (e.g. I voted for Ron Paul), but the gas tax is actually one of the fairest taxes</p>
<p>in the system, IMHO, and I&#8217;d like to see a portion of the income tax and/or payroll tax shifted to the gas tax.</p>
<p>Think about it, a higher gas tax (and lower income/payroll tax) would:</p>
<p>1) discourage wasteful driving</p>
<p>2) encourage fuel efficiency</p>
<p>3) encourage mass transit</p>
<p>4) encourage employment (more bring-home pay)</p>
<p>5) result in less power to (and therefore, fear of) the IRS</p>
<p>5) enable fair ways for the taxed to minimize their tax rate (e.g. walk, ride bike, live closer to work,</p>
<p>etc.)</p>
<p>I realize this would have a cascade effect of making all consumer goods cost more, but everyone would have more money in their paychecks to afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

