<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Mechanics: 5 TurboCharger Innovations for Fuel Efficiency and Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucien Beauley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-8433</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucien Beauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-8433</guid>
		<description>There have been many attempts to design an electric powered vehicle for as long as the the internal combustion engine has been around. Unfortunately, battery power was never a formidable contender to the present internal combustion engine, but it looks as though it is time for change.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gomestic.com/Consumer-Information/The-Electric-Vehicle-is-It-the-Answer.20777&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Electric Vehicle, is It the Answer?&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been many attempts to design an electric powered vehicle for as long as the the internal combustion engine has been around. Unfortunately, battery power was never a formidable contender to the present internal combustion engine, but it looks as though it is time for change.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gomestic.com/Consumer-Information/The-Electric-Vehicle-is-It-the-Answer.20777" rel="nofollow">The Electric Vehicle, is It the Answer?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucien Beauley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-31123</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucien Beauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-31123</guid>
		<description>There have been many attempts to design an electric powered vehicle for as long as the the internal combustion engine has been around. Unfortunately, battery power was never a formidable contender to the present internal combustion engine, but it looks as though it is time for change.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gomestic.com/Consumer-Information/The-Electric-Vehicle-is-It-the-Answer.20777&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Electric Vehicle, is It the Answer?&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been many attempts to design an electric powered vehicle for as long as the the internal combustion engine has been around. Unfortunately, battery power was never a formidable contender to the present internal combustion engine, but it looks as though it is time for change.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gomestic.com/Consumer-Information/The-Electric-Vehicle-is-It-the-Answer.20777" rel="nofollow">The Electric Vehicle, is It the Answer?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucien Beauley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-8432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucien Beauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-8432</guid>
		<description>I do not believe that any present modifications of existing gasoline or diesel engines can ever compete with the upcoming &quot;electrics&quot; as far as efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that any present modifications of existing gasoline or diesel engines can ever compete with the upcoming &#8220;electrics&#8221; as far as efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucien Beauley</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-31122</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucien Beauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-31122</guid>
		<description>I do not believe that any present modifications of existing gasoline or diesel engines can ever compete with the upcoming &quot;electrics&quot; as far as efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that any present modifications of existing gasoline or diesel engines can ever compete with the upcoming &#8220;electrics&#8221; as far as efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-8431</guid>
		<description>There are a few innovative turbos out there - companies like VW/Porsche have been developing variable-boost, clean-running turbos for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few innovative turbos out there &#8211; companies like VW/Porsche have been developing variable-boost, clean-running turbos for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-31121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-31121</guid>
		<description>There are a few innovative turbos out there - companies like VW/Porsche have been developing variable-boost, clean-running turbos for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few innovative turbos out there &#8211; companies like VW/Porsche have been developing variable-boost, clean-running turbos for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNCMike</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-8430</link>
		<dc:creator>CNCMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-8430</guid>
		<description>I noticed the other day that the Saturn Sky turbo 2.0 is EPA rated higher city and highway than the standard 2.5



I also read about Ford testing a truck with a turbo on a 9 or 10 to 1 compression engine using an ethanol injection unit and reported nearly the same torque as their diesel and better mileage than the standard engine, whatever that was - don&#039;t remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the other day that the Saturn Sky turbo 2.0 is EPA rated higher city and highway than the standard 2.5</p>
<p>I also read about Ford testing a truck with a turbo on a 9 or 10 to 1 compression engine using an ethanol injection unit and reported nearly the same torque as their diesel and better mileage than the standard engine, whatever that was &#8211; don&#8217;t remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNCMike</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/02/27/popular-mechanics-5-turbocharger-innovations-for-fuel-efficiency-and-power/#comment-31120</link>
		<dc:creator>CNCMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1824#comment-31120</guid>
		<description>I noticed the other day that the Saturn Sky turbo 2.0 is EPA rated higher city and highway than the standard 2.5



I also read about Ford testing a truck with a turbo on a 9 or 10 to 1 compression engine using an ethanol injection unit and reported nearly the same torque as their diesel and better mileage than the standard engine, whatever that was - don&#039;t remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the other day that the Saturn Sky turbo 2.0 is EPA rated higher city and highway than the standard 2.5</p>
<p>I also read about Ford testing a truck with a turbo on a 9 or 10 to 1 compression engine using an ethanol injection unit and reported nearly the same torque as their diesel and better mileage than the standard engine, whatever that was &#8211; don&#8217;t remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

