California Gets the Green Light to Regulate New Car Mileage

President Obama has instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to grant waivers to California and other states that seek to regulate vehicle emissions and mileage. This reverses a Bush policy and has automakers up in arms.

Traditionally, the Federal government has set standards for emissions and mileage - standards that are widely criticized among environmentalists as being too lax. Starting in 1975, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations were enacted as a way to continually increase fuel efficiency of vehicles sold. The regulations came out of the ’70s oil shocks and started with a mandated average 18 miles per gallon (MPG) of all the vehicles produced by each auto manufacturer in a given year, starting in vehicle year 1978. Fast forward to 2007 and the minimum has risen only to 27.5 MPG. In 2008, President Bush set a CAFE goal of 35 MPG by 2020.

California as a Leader

California has long been the leader of air quality regulations. The California Environmental Protection Agency and their subset California Air Resources Board (CARB), has put forward many standards and regulations that are copied by other states. Often times Oregon and Washington state have reached agreements on emission controls by copying what California has already put forward.

The new goals of California are to push up the CAFE standards of 35 MPG in 2020 to 35 MPG in 2016 for all vehicles sold in the state. It is the same standard, just moved up four years, which is not a big difference, but it sets the precedent for states to have control. California and the states that follow it in such regulations will, by sheer power of their purchasing power, force automakers to sell more efficient, less polluting vehicles, or face fines and lost sales.

Feeling it in the Pocket Book

For years you couldn’t find new diesel cars for sale in California because of emissions standards - diesels put out more particulate matter than gas cars. Diesel emissions technologies have now advanced to the point where they are legal to sell in California. The total market for diesel passenger vehicles is very small in the US (but growing) and not being able to sell in California wasn’t much of a loss for auto makers. Extending the reach of state regulations to every other passenger vehicle on the market will surely create a large impact as auto makers, who, thinking of lost market share, will finally bring us choices for efficient cars.

The Consumer is the Winner

To the auto makers that are resisting these changes, I feel no sympathy. Consumers have been wanting more efficient cars for years now - just look at the sales figures for hybrids. People of course are worried that better efficiency means less power and less safety, but these fears can be overcome. Yes your car will be able to accelerate when you need it to - yes it goes over 55 miles per hour - no it isn’t made of tin foil to save weight. Don’t just make more efficient cars for the states that require it of you - do it for the whole country. There may be a cost to retooling factories to make more efficient vehicles, but we all know the technology is here - just look at American cars for sale overseas and you will find very efficient vehicles.

Source: New York Times
Image credit: frumbert at Flickr under a Creative Commons license

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

20 Comments

  1. what i’m worried about is that the NOx “issue” with biodiesel has not been adequately answered and that CA and other states will eliminate the usage of biodiesel. Sounds ridiculous, but it’s already happened in the 110 most populous counties in Texas.

  2. “California has long been the leader of air quality regulations.”

    Unfortunately, California has also long been the leader in cities with serious air pollution problems, much of which can be attributed to vehicle emissions, the sheer number of vehicles on the roads, and (importantly) the climate and geography of these polluted areas.

  3. This is a bad idea and very surprising coming from a democrat. Instead of allowing 50 different sets of rules, the government should in act 1 federal set of rules. Have the states all submit their ideas and select the best one. The time where 50 different laws for the same thing should be long past.

  4. Anyone know if there will be a federal minimum for fuel efficiency and a maximum for CO2 emissions? I would say that it’s fine for states to set their own standards as long as they don’t go in the wrong direction.

  5. I agree with Doug. This is not leadership. Set a good federal standard that takes effect before 2016, because that is probably the year the Republicans gain the upper hand again and roll everything back.

  6. welll he will change the face of america.

  7. We WAITED for the Bush’s Feds to write the rules, but they DIDN’T!
    They just stalled and pushed it to the next Prez.
    But a Democrat was elected! Fancy that!
    Now someone with stones will try to get someone to actually do something about it!
    If we left it up to the Feds and their lobbyists, NOTHING would EVER come of it! Stall, stall, stall!
    Inaction, inaction, inaction!
    I say do something now!
    Let’s have some action! Somebody LEAD!

  8. Supposedly Obama has complete support from this majority Democrat Congress. If he can not push through something as simple as emissions laws he is going to be a lame duck anyway.

  9. Doug has it correct in what this will do to the rules sets. What he didn’t mention is that these variable rules from state to state will increase the costs of all cars and trucks, and most likely violates the constitutional requirement for all states to give full faith and credit to the laws of every other state.

    Also, in the reports that I heard the EPA was instructed to reconsider the rules, not to just change them as reported by Gas 2.0

Pages: [1] 2 »

Tell us what you think: