<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Will Not Apologize for Our Way of Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Texas</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-7596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-7596</guid>
		<description>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#039;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.



When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.



Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &quot;vote present&quot; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#8217;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.</p>
<p>When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.</p>
<p>Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &#8220;vote present&#8221; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Texas</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30491</guid>
		<description>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#039;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.



When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.



Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &quot;vote present&quot; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#8217;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.</p>
<p>When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.</p>
<p>Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &#8220;vote present&#8221; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Texas</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30492</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30492</guid>
		<description>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#039;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.



When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.



Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &quot;vote present&quot; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while we are going to see a lot of parsing of President Obama&#8217;s statements.  During his entire campaign he tended to be as vague as possible letting people fill in the blanks with their hopes.  Some people seem to think that Obama promised to give them a free unicorn.  They are likely to be disappointed.</p>
<p>When it comes to cars, I think that Obama is likely to push for mandatory flex fuel engines for all new cars and for an increase in CAFE standards, although nothing like the 40 or 50 MPG that some people seem to be salivating for.  I would like to see Obama slap down the EPA rules that threaten $5000 a day fines for tampering with emission controls for adding an unauthorized CNG conversion kit to your vehicle.</p>
<p>Given his past history, I think that Obama will largely &#8220;vote present&#8221; as far as he can and let other people, like California requiring stricter emission controls and higher mileage, push the car industry towards cleaner, more efficient cars.  He might go for an oil import tax, although there would probably be an exemption for Canada and Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-7595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-7595</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &quot;NOPE, I SAID &#039;What is the THIRD WORD,&#039; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&quot;



The author gives no reason why &quot;apologize for our way of life&quot; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &quot;it says to me&quot; ..as in you think?  That&#039;s why we&#039;re reading your article?



To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &quot;our way of life&quot; means &quot;drive gas cars.&quot;



It irritates me how such a powerful line &quot;We will not apologize for our way of life&quot; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &#8220;NOPE, I SAID &#8216;What is the THIRD WORD,&#8217; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&#8221;</p>
<p>The author gives no reason why &#8220;apologize for our way of life&#8221; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &#8220;it says to me&#8221; ..as in you think?  That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re reading your article?</p>
<p>To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &#8220;our way of life&#8221; means &#8220;drive gas cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>It irritates me how such a powerful line &#8220;We will not apologize for our way of life&#8221; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30489</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30489</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &quot;NOPE, I SAID &#039;What is the THIRD WORD,&#039; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&quot;



The author gives no reason why &quot;apologize for our way of life&quot; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &quot;it says to me&quot; ..as in you think?  That&#039;s why we&#039;re reading your article?



To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &quot;our way of life&quot; means &quot;drive gas cars.&quot;



It irritates me how such a powerful line &quot;We will not apologize for our way of life&quot; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &#8220;NOPE, I SAID &#8216;What is the THIRD WORD,&#8217; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&#8221;</p>
<p>The author gives no reason why &#8220;apologize for our way of life&#8221; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &#8220;it says to me&#8221; ..as in you think?  That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re reading your article?</p>
<p>To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &#8220;our way of life&#8221; means &#8220;drive gas cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>It irritates me how such a powerful line &#8220;We will not apologize for our way of life&#8221; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30490</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30490</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &quot;NOPE, I SAID &#039;What is the THIRD WORD,&#039; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&quot;



The author gives no reason why &quot;apologize for our way of life&quot; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &quot;it says to me&quot; ..as in you think?  That&#039;s why we&#039;re reading your article?



To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &quot;our way of life&quot; means &quot;drive gas cars.&quot;



It irritates me how such a powerful line &quot;We will not apologize for our way of life&quot; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this article reminds me of those kindergarteners who played those stupid tricks where they ask you a reasonable question, and then cleverly decieve you, &#8220;NOPE, I SAID &#8216;What is the THIRD WORD,&#8217; GET IT???? I MEANT THIRD WORD.&#8221;</p>
<p>The author gives no reason why &#8220;apologize for our way of life&#8221; even remotely deals with the topic of fueling cars other than &#8220;it says to me&#8221; ..as in you think?  That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re reading your article?</p>
<p>To summarize, [Obama might like do something, maybe be more like Europe, or not, maybe I dunno.. Obama might do something though, I mean he said we should cuz theres bad guys..  and he knows about solar and that stuff.]  Which we read because you think &#8220;our way of life&#8221; means &#8220;drive gas cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>It irritates me how such a powerful line &#8220;We will not apologize for our way of life&#8221; is the title of an article that dwindles down to such meek generalizations and things we were already wondering.  Especially from an author that has tackled important subjects and issues not yet thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-7594</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-7594</guid>
		<description>My point is that &quot;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&quot; is like &quot;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&quot;



Not going to happen.



And also, I don&#039;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &quot;European model&quot; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#039;s an impossible goal.



We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.



The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that &#8220;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&#8221; is like &#8220;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not going to happen.</p>
<p>And also, I don&#8217;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &#8220;European model&#8221; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#8217;s an impossible goal.</p>
<p>We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.</p>
<p>The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30487</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30487</guid>
		<description>My point is that &quot;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&quot; is like &quot;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&quot;



Not going to happen.



And also, I don&#039;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &quot;European model&quot; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#039;s an impossible goal.



We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.



The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that &#8220;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&#8221; is like &#8220;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not going to happen.</p>
<p>And also, I don&#8217;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &#8220;European model&#8221; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#8217;s an impossible goal.</p>
<p>We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.</p>
<p>The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-30488</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-30488</guid>
		<description>My point is that &quot;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&quot; is like &quot;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&quot;



Not going to happen.



And also, I don&#039;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &quot;European model&quot; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#039;s an impossible goal.



We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.



The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that &#8220;walking, community and health, while discouraging car ownership&#8221; is like &#8220;promoting abstinence as a form of birth control.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not going to happen.</p>
<p>And also, I don&#8217;t know how everyone in America feels, but I know that I have no interest whatsoever in a &#8220;European model&#8221; society.  Besides, who is going to pay for restructuring places like Socal where planned communities are plastered all over the place?  It&#8217;s an impossible goal.</p>
<p>We need alternative energy vehicles that offer 300 miles of range with reasonable charge time or home refueling options, etc.  This is a very achievable goal.</p>
<p>The big 3 should have been working on this for years already and jumped right in to the market when the gas prices first shot through the roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Morris</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2009/01/22/we-will-not-apologize-for-our-way-of-life/#comment-7593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1625#comment-7593</guid>
		<description>I think he was referring to the threat of terrorism, and not the car culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he was referring to the threat of terrorism, and not the car culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

