<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: America&#039;s Love Affair With Cars is Ending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog in Miami Gardens</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-7382</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog in Miami Gardens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-7382</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, guys. I think this is a permanent shift because there are other deeper, soul-searching issues taking place, as well. With the recent debaucle involving bailouts for Wall Street and the Auto Big-Three, and the thousands of lay-offs, many average Americans are reassessing what is really important. I tried to avoid being anecdotal, but I can point to three of my friends, one who is married with children, who are either thinking of going carless or are getting rid of one of their family cars. Now, two of them had fiscal reasons. The third, however, is in a situation where her and her husband have decent jobs, but they just don&#039;t feel it necessary to own two cars anymore. In fact, the husband catches the express bus to work now, the last I heard. If the economy does improve, you will always have that stubborn percentage who will return to their old ways, but I think a large majority of us will continue to live a different sort of lifestyle than we did before this crisis. Also, if the economy does improve, I get the feeling that it won&#039;t &quot;improve&quot; in the way we might think. People will have and regain jobs, but these jobs are going to pay way less (particularly in the financial services industry) and will require way more flexibility from employees AND employers. And to go further off-topic, the way we view &quot;success&quot; is going to radically change. I volunteer with elementary-age school children, and their outlook on the world seems just so much more practical and realistic than it did when I was their age. It&#039;s fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, guys. I think this is a permanent shift because there are other deeper, soul-searching issues taking place, as well. With the recent debaucle involving bailouts for Wall Street and the Auto Big-Three, and the thousands of lay-offs, many average Americans are reassessing what is really important. I tried to avoid being anecdotal, but I can point to three of my friends, one who is married with children, who are either thinking of going carless or are getting rid of one of their family cars. Now, two of them had fiscal reasons. The third, however, is in a situation where her and her husband have decent jobs, but they just don&#8217;t feel it necessary to own two cars anymore. In fact, the husband catches the express bus to work now, the last I heard. If the economy does improve, you will always have that stubborn percentage who will return to their old ways, but I think a large majority of us will continue to live a different sort of lifestyle than we did before this crisis. Also, if the economy does improve, I get the feeling that it won&#8217;t &#8220;improve&#8221; in the way we might think. People will have and regain jobs, but these jobs are going to pay way less (particularly in the financial services industry) and will require way more flexibility from employees AND employers. And to go further off-topic, the way we view &#8220;success&#8221; is going to radically change. I volunteer with elementary-age school children, and their outlook on the world seems just so much more practical and realistic than it did when I was their age. It&#8217;s fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog in Miami Gardens</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-29694</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog in Miami Gardens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-29694</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, guys. I think this is a permanent shift because there are other deeper, soul-searching issues taking place, as well. With the recent debaucle involving bailouts for Wall Street and the Auto Big-Three, and the thousands of lay-offs, many average Americans are reassessing what is really important. I tried to avoid being anecdotal, but I can point to three of my friends, one who is married with children, who are either thinking of going carless or are getting rid of one of their family cars. Now, two of them had fiscal reasons. The third, however, is in a situation where her and her husband have decent jobs, but they just don&#039;t feel it necessary to own two cars anymore. In fact, the husband catches the express bus to work now, the last I heard. If the economy does improve, you will always have that stubborn percentage who will return to their old ways, but I think a large majority of us will continue to live a different sort of lifestyle than we did before this crisis. Also, if the economy does improve, I get the feeling that it won&#039;t &quot;improve&quot; in the way we might think. People will have and regain jobs, but these jobs are going to pay way less (particularly in the financial services industry) and will require way more flexibility from employees AND employers. And to go further off-topic, the way we view &quot;success&quot; is going to radically change. I volunteer with elementary-age school children, and their outlook on the world seems just so much more practical and realistic than it did when I was their age. It&#039;s fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, guys. I think this is a permanent shift because there are other deeper, soul-searching issues taking place, as well. With the recent debaucle involving bailouts for Wall Street and the Auto Big-Three, and the thousands of lay-offs, many average Americans are reassessing what is really important. I tried to avoid being anecdotal, but I can point to three of my friends, one who is married with children, who are either thinking of going carless or are getting rid of one of their family cars. Now, two of them had fiscal reasons. The third, however, is in a situation where her and her husband have decent jobs, but they just don&#8217;t feel it necessary to own two cars anymore. In fact, the husband catches the express bus to work now, the last I heard. If the economy does improve, you will always have that stubborn percentage who will return to their old ways, but I think a large majority of us will continue to live a different sort of lifestyle than we did before this crisis. Also, if the economy does improve, I get the feeling that it won&#8217;t &#8220;improve&#8221; in the way we might think. People will have and regain jobs, but these jobs are going to pay way less (particularly in the financial services industry) and will require way more flexibility from employees AND employers. And to go further off-topic, the way we view &#8220;success&#8221; is going to radically change. I volunteer with elementary-age school children, and their outlook on the world seems just so much more practical and realistic than it did when I was their age. It&#8217;s fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Gawronski</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Gawronski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>When the spike in gasoline hit during the summer, it seemed so severe for some people that they drove less while cutting back on other items for the gas they did have to buy. Oil was considered a major threat to our economy.



The lowering of recent gas prices have given many people a new sense of economic security in which they seem to have forgotten the $4.00 a gallon price just four or five months ago. In my area, you would hardy see a Hummer on the road back then, now they are popping up everywhere again, more and more everyday. It is like drivers parked them in a garage waiting for them to be affordable to drive again.



It is the same with our local utility companies. They kept the larger Ford F550 work trucks and other big vehicles in the parking fence and limited their use in the summer and early fall. Now the trucks are gone during the day showing they are being used again. It is a water company in Florida so there may be other factors than just fleet fueling costs, but I am sure it did have something to do with their budgets and fleet plans.



Most concerning of less driving, while we do need to do so, is the majority mindset that has totally forgotten about alternative fueling sources, smaller vehicles, and other transportation forms. The talk around the water cooler, the local coffee shop, and the lobby at church was about the new technology being created for fueling our cars and trucks to get us off of imported oil and gasoline in general. Today, many of these same people I come in contact with say they have other things to be concerned about since they can &quot;afford&quot; gas again at $1.65 a gallon than the Pickens Plan, batteries for cars, or giving up size and comfort of a larger vehicle.



It seems that as American&#039;s more forward, we seem to forget about the past. It reminds me of the 1980&#039;s all over again when my father went from driving less during the oil shortage to buying hot rod sportscars that drank fuel like a jogger drinking water. What a shame........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the spike in gasoline hit during the summer, it seemed so severe for some people that they drove less while cutting back on other items for the gas they did have to buy. Oil was considered a major threat to our economy.</p>
<p>The lowering of recent gas prices have given many people a new sense of economic security in which they seem to have forgotten the $4.00 a gallon price just four or five months ago. In my area, you would hardy see a Hummer on the road back then, now they are popping up everywhere again, more and more everyday. It is like drivers parked them in a garage waiting for them to be affordable to drive again.</p>
<p>It is the same with our local utility companies. They kept the larger Ford F550 work trucks and other big vehicles in the parking fence and limited their use in the summer and early fall. Now the trucks are gone during the day showing they are being used again. It is a water company in Florida so there may be other factors than just fleet fueling costs, but I am sure it did have something to do with their budgets and fleet plans.</p>
<p>Most concerning of less driving, while we do need to do so, is the majority mindset that has totally forgotten about alternative fueling sources, smaller vehicles, and other transportation forms. The talk around the water cooler, the local coffee shop, and the lobby at church was about the new technology being created for fueling our cars and trucks to get us off of imported oil and gasoline in general. Today, many of these same people I come in contact with say they have other things to be concerned about since they can &#8220;afford&#8221; gas again at $1.65 a gallon than the Pickens Plan, batteries for cars, or giving up size and comfort of a larger vehicle.</p>
<p>It seems that as American&#8217;s more forward, we seem to forget about the past. It reminds me of the 1980&#8242;s all over again when my father went from driving less during the oil shortage to buying hot rod sportscars that drank fuel like a jogger drinking water. What a shame&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Gawronski</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-29693</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Gawronski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-29693</guid>
		<description>When the spike in gasoline hit during the summer, it seemed so severe for some people that they drove less while cutting back on other items for the gas they did have to buy. Oil was considered a major threat to our economy.



The lowering of recent gas prices have given many people a new sense of economic security in which they seem to have forgotten the $4.00 a gallon price just four or five months ago. In my area, you would hardy see a Hummer on the road back then, now they are popping up everywhere again, more and more everyday. It is like drivers parked them in a garage waiting for them to be affordable to drive again.



It is the same with our local utility companies. They kept the larger Ford F550 work trucks and other big vehicles in the parking fence and limited their use in the summer and early fall. Now the trucks are gone during the day showing they are being used again. It is a water company in Florida so there may be other factors than just fleet fueling costs, but I am sure it did have something to do with their budgets and fleet plans.



Most concerning of less driving, while we do need to do so, is the majority mindset that has totally forgotten about alternative fueling sources, smaller vehicles, and other transportation forms. The talk around the water cooler, the local coffee shop, and the lobby at church was about the new technology being created for fueling our cars and trucks to get us off of imported oil and gasoline in general. Today, many of these same people I come in contact with say they have other things to be concerned about since they can &quot;afford&quot; gas again at $1.65 a gallon than the Pickens Plan, batteries for cars, or giving up size and comfort of a larger vehicle.



It seems that as American&#039;s more forward, we seem to forget about the past. It reminds me of the 1980&#039;s all over again when my father went from driving less during the oil shortage to buying hot rod sportscars that drank fuel like a jogger drinking water. What a shame........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the spike in gasoline hit during the summer, it seemed so severe for some people that they drove less while cutting back on other items for the gas they did have to buy. Oil was considered a major threat to our economy.</p>
<p>The lowering of recent gas prices have given many people a new sense of economic security in which they seem to have forgotten the $4.00 a gallon price just four or five months ago. In my area, you would hardy see a Hummer on the road back then, now they are popping up everywhere again, more and more everyday. It is like drivers parked them in a garage waiting for them to be affordable to drive again.</p>
<p>It is the same with our local utility companies. They kept the larger Ford F550 work trucks and other big vehicles in the parking fence and limited their use in the summer and early fall. Now the trucks are gone during the day showing they are being used again. It is a water company in Florida so there may be other factors than just fleet fueling costs, but I am sure it did have something to do with their budgets and fleet plans.</p>
<p>Most concerning of less driving, while we do need to do so, is the majority mindset that has totally forgotten about alternative fueling sources, smaller vehicles, and other transportation forms. The talk around the water cooler, the local coffee shop, and the lobby at church was about the new technology being created for fueling our cars and trucks to get us off of imported oil and gasoline in general. Today, many of these same people I come in contact with say they have other things to be concerned about since they can &#8220;afford&#8221; gas again at $1.65 a gallon than the Pickens Plan, batteries for cars, or giving up size and comfort of a larger vehicle.</p>
<p>It seems that as American&#8217;s more forward, we seem to forget about the past. It reminds me of the 1980&#8242;s all over again when my father went from driving less during the oil shortage to buying hot rod sportscars that drank fuel like a jogger drinking water. What a shame&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-7380</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-7380</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#039;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#039;d have to go at least twice a month or so - I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.



We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#039;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.



Given this, I can&#039;t help but wonder if the best &quot;transportation infrastructure&quot; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#8217;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#8217;d have to go at least twice a month or so &#8211; I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.</p>
<p>We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#8217;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.</p>
<p>Given this, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the best &#8220;transportation infrastructure&#8221; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-29691</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-29691</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#039;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#039;d have to go at least twice a month or so - I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.



We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#039;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.



Given this, I can&#039;t help but wonder if the best &quot;transportation infrastructure&quot; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#8217;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#8217;d have to go at least twice a month or so &#8211; I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.</p>
<p>We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#8217;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.</p>
<p>Given this, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the best &#8220;transportation infrastructure&#8221; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-29692</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-29692</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#039;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#039;d have to go at least twice a month or so - I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.



We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#039;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.



Given this, I can&#039;t help but wonder if the best &quot;transportation infrastructure&quot; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason for miles going down is the Internet.  People telecommute more, order stuff online (regular deliveries by USPS or UPS are more efficient than a zillion people heading to the mall), take care of bureaucratic stuff online, etc.  I haven&#8217;t had to go to a government office in years, while ten years ago I&#8217;d have to go at least twice a month or so &#8211; I do all this sort of thing online nowadays.</p>
<p>We still drive cars to go to work and to buy groceries, but we only put about 20K miles a year combined on two cars, with about 15K put on by my wife as a small business broker.  In the 1990s, I&#8217;d routinely run up 25K miles in a year by myself.</p>
<p>Given this, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the best &#8220;transportation infrastructure&#8221; for the buck is superfast internet for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-7379</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-7379</guid>
		<description>&quot;The bulk of traffic are those thousands of suburbians sitting bumper to bumper for 2-3 hours each day as they go back and forth to work&quot;



I hear that all the time but find it pretty difficult to believe. In the case of your example, until recently I lived in one of those outlying Dallas suburbs (Frisco).  Nearly all of my neighbors worked at Legacy Business Park (about 3 miles away), the remainder somewhere outside 635, mostly north of the GBT.  The situation is similar in the outlying burb I live in now - 40 miles from city center, I am not aware of a single neighbor who works more than 10 miles away except me, but I only go into the office once a week - and was when I lived on the west coast as well, leaving me very suspicious of the general criticisms of urban sprawl.



On the public transportation issue: the area I live in now has an outstanding rapid transit system that is grossly underutilized.  I hear one massively expensive idea for increasing ridership after another, when one simple, relatively cheap (by mass transit standards anyway) measure would, I&#039;m pretty sure, massively increase ridership in an instant: put a police officer on every car (the same was true of th DART rail system in Dallas, by the way).  You will never get people to use public transit if they believe doing so puts them in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The bulk of traffic are those thousands of suburbians sitting bumper to bumper for 2-3 hours each day as they go back and forth to work&#8221;</p>
<p>I hear that all the time but find it pretty difficult to believe. In the case of your example, until recently I lived in one of those outlying Dallas suburbs (Frisco).  Nearly all of my neighbors worked at Legacy Business Park (about 3 miles away), the remainder somewhere outside 635, mostly north of the GBT.  The situation is similar in the outlying burb I live in now &#8211; 40 miles from city center, I am not aware of a single neighbor who works more than 10 miles away except me, but I only go into the office once a week &#8211; and was when I lived on the west coast as well, leaving me very suspicious of the general criticisms of urban sprawl.</p>
<p>On the public transportation issue: the area I live in now has an outstanding rapid transit system that is grossly underutilized.  I hear one massively expensive idea for increasing ridership after another, when one simple, relatively cheap (by mass transit standards anyway) measure would, I&#8217;m pretty sure, massively increase ridership in an instant: put a police officer on every car (the same was true of th DART rail system in Dallas, by the way).  You will never get people to use public transit if they believe doing so puts them in danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-29690</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-29690</guid>
		<description>&quot;The bulk of traffic are those thousands of suburbians sitting bumper to bumper for 2-3 hours each day as they go back and forth to work&quot;



I hear that all the time but find it pretty difficult to believe. In the case of your example, until recently I lived in one of those outlying Dallas suburbs (Frisco).  Nearly all of my neighbors worked at Legacy Business Park (about 3 miles away), the remainder somewhere outside 635, mostly north of the GBT.  The situation is similar in the outlying burb I live in now - 40 miles from city center, I am not aware of a single neighbor who works more than 10 miles away except me, but I only go into the office once a week - and was when I lived on the west coast as well, leaving me very suspicious of the general criticisms of urban sprawl.



On the public transportation issue: the area I live in now has an outstanding rapid transit system that is grossly underutilized.  I hear one massively expensive idea for increasing ridership after another, when one simple, relatively cheap (by mass transit standards anyway) measure would, I&#039;m pretty sure, massively increase ridership in an instant: put a police officer on every car (the same was true of th DART rail system in Dallas, by the way).  You will never get people to use public transit if they believe doing so puts them in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The bulk of traffic are those thousands of suburbians sitting bumper to bumper for 2-3 hours each day as they go back and forth to work&#8221;</p>
<p>I hear that all the time but find it pretty difficult to believe. In the case of your example, until recently I lived in one of those outlying Dallas suburbs (Frisco).  Nearly all of my neighbors worked at Legacy Business Park (about 3 miles away), the remainder somewhere outside 635, mostly north of the GBT.  The situation is similar in the outlying burb I live in now &#8211; 40 miles from city center, I am not aware of a single neighbor who works more than 10 miles away except me, but I only go into the office once a week &#8211; and was when I lived on the west coast as well, leaving me very suspicious of the general criticisms of urban sprawl.</p>
<p>On the public transportation issue: the area I live in now has an outstanding rapid transit system that is grossly underutilized.  I hear one massively expensive idea for increasing ridership after another, when one simple, relatively cheap (by mass transit standards anyway) measure would, I&#8217;m pretty sure, massively increase ridership in an instant: put a police officer on every car (the same was true of th DART rail system in Dallas, by the way).  You will never get people to use public transit if they believe doing so puts them in danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/17/report-americans-love-affair-with-cars-is-ending/#comment-7378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1425#comment-7378</guid>
		<description>Nick Chambers:



I don&#039;t care if you think I&#039;m a &quot;jerk&quot;, nor am I bothered by any of your other insults.  I&#039;ll simply point out that it is you who call names.  Every comment from you on this site is an attack on someone with a dissenting opinion.



As editor you are responsible for choosing what gets printed on your site, as well as how that content is presented.  I&#039;ve done my job.  I think now you&#039;ll be more careful about spreading stories that are potentially harmful to your own goals.



I&#039;ll leave you now.  Apparently name calling is what passes for intelligent discourse.  Over and out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Chambers:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you think I&#8217;m a &#8220;jerk&#8221;, nor am I bothered by any of your other insults.  I&#8217;ll simply point out that it is you who call names.  Every comment from you on this site is an attack on someone with a dissenting opinion.</p>
<p>As editor you are responsible for choosing what gets printed on your site, as well as how that content is presented.  I&#8217;ve done my job.  I think now you&#8217;ll be more careful about spreading stories that are potentially harmful to your own goals.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave you now.  Apparently name calling is what passes for intelligent discourse.  Over and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

