<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol Industry Wants to Join Forces With Car Makers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Oliveri</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29030</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Oliveri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29030</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lonni B, on the assement regarding the oil and car compannies being joined at the hip.I am delighted at not being alone in my conjecture to the fact.This goes back from the begining of both industries lock in step so to say. Otherwise we would have vehicles with greater miles per gallon potential,not halve measures.Its hard to beleive that the internal combustion engine still has the same basic architecture from its inception,ithe the exce ption of a lot of external add ons , there is very little to distinguish it from its predocessor.But for now  I will not pursue that direction.

If our country is serious about reducing foreign oil dependency ethanol,shows great promise,with technology constantly improving its extrction potential. Just as improvents were made to yield greater gasoline output grom a barrel of oil.Just like any other technology its a building block system to greater yields and uses. At present it is maligned by not having the energy output as gasoline, but that is as one reader stated optimum compression ratios are utilized ethanol fuels, and surely the auto companies know that,they just omit that fact.Current engines with optimal compression ratios could run efficiently up to 50/50 fuel blend without adverse effects, and good fuel economy and low emissions, not to mention at  little cost to the manufacurer.Unfortunatly since profit is always on the forefront, solutions will be hard found.

we we have great abilitie and possibilities, too bad greed and profit stands in the way.

Paul Oliveri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lonni B, on the assement regarding the oil and car compannies being joined at the hip.I am delighted at not being alone in my conjecture to the fact.This goes back from the begining of both industries lock in step so to say. Otherwise we would have vehicles with greater miles per gallon potential,not halve measures.Its hard to beleive that the internal combustion engine still has the same basic architecture from its inception,ithe the exce ption of a lot of external add ons , there is very little to distinguish it from its predocessor.But for now  I will not pursue that direction.</p>
<p>If our country is serious about reducing foreign oil dependency ethanol,shows great promise,with technology constantly improving its extrction potential. Just as improvents were made to yield greater gasoline output grom a barrel of oil.Just like any other technology its a building block system to greater yields and uses. At present it is maligned by not having the energy output as gasoline, but that is as one reader stated optimum compression ratios are utilized ethanol fuels, and surely the auto companies know that,they just omit that fact.Current engines with optimal compression ratios could run efficiently up to 50/50 fuel blend without adverse effects, and good fuel economy and low emissions, not to mention at  little cost to the manufacurer.Unfortunatly since profit is always on the forefront, solutions will be hard found.</p>
<p>we we have great abilitie and possibilities, too bad greed and profit stands in the way.</p>
<p>Paul Oliveri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Oliveri</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Oliveri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lonni B, on the assement regarding the oil and car compannies being joined at the hip.I am delighted at not being alone in my conjecture to the fact.This goes back from the begining of both industries lock in step so to say. Otherwise we would have vehicles with greater miles per gallon potential,not halve measures.Its hard to beleive that the internal combustion engine still has the same basic architecture from its inception,ithe the exce ption of a lot of external add ons , there is very little to distinguish it from its predocessor.But for now  I will not pursue that direction.

If our country is serious about reducing foreign oil dependency ethanol,shows great promise,with technology constantly improving its extrction potential. Just as improvents were made to yield greater gasoline output grom a barrel of oil.Just like any other technology its a building block system to greater yields and uses. At present it is maligned by not having the energy output as gasoline, but that is as one reader stated optimum compression ratios are utilized ethanol fuels, and surely the auto companies know that,they just omit that fact.Current engines with optimal compression ratios could run efficiently up to 50/50 fuel blend without adverse effects, and good fuel economy and low emissions, not to mention at  little cost to the manufacurer.Unfortunatly since profit is always on the forefront, solutions will be hard found.

we we have great abilitie and possibilities, too bad greed and profit stands in the way.

Paul Oliveri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lonni B, on the assement regarding the oil and car compannies being joined at the hip.I am delighted at not being alone in my conjecture to the fact.This goes back from the begining of both industries lock in step so to say. Otherwise we would have vehicles with greater miles per gallon potential,not halve measures.Its hard to beleive that the internal combustion engine still has the same basic architecture from its inception,ithe the exce ption of a lot of external add ons , there is very little to distinguish it from its predocessor.But for now  I will not pursue that direction.</p>
<p>If our country is serious about reducing foreign oil dependency ethanol,shows great promise,with technology constantly improving its extrction potential. Just as improvents were made to yield greater gasoline output grom a barrel of oil.Just like any other technology its a building block system to greater yields and uses. At present it is maligned by not having the energy output as gasoline, but that is as one reader stated optimum compression ratios are utilized ethanol fuels, and surely the auto companies know that,they just omit that fact.Current engines with optimal compression ratios could run efficiently up to 50/50 fuel blend without adverse effects, and good fuel economy and low emissions, not to mention at  little cost to the manufacurer.Unfortunatly since profit is always on the forefront, solutions will be hard found.</p>
<p>we we have great abilitie and possibilities, too bad greed and profit stands in the way.</p>
<p>Paul Oliveri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-6872</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-6872</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29028</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29029</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29029</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Jeff, what are your sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brand</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-6871</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-6871</guid>
		<description>To follow up on Jeff&#039;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.



Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#039;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#039;natural food&#039; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#039;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.



The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on Jeff&#8217;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.</p>
<p>Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#8217;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#8216;natural food&#8217; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#8217;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.</p>
<p>The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brand</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29026</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29026</guid>
		<description>To follow up on Jeff&#039;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.



Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#039;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#039;natural food&#039; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#039;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.



The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on Jeff&#8217;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.</p>
<p>Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#8217;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#8216;natural food&#8217; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#8217;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.</p>
<p>The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brand</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29027</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29027</guid>
		<description>To follow up on Jeff&#039;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.



Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#039;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#039;natural food&#039; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#039;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.



The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on Jeff&#8217;s corn/algae symbiosis,  there is symbiosis beyond the fuel relations.  Corn has next to no Omega3 lipids.  Animals cannot be successfully raised on DDG feed alone and are presently supplemented with soybean for its moderate omega3 content.  Selecting an algae that has an appropriate balance between oil production and omega3 content will make a more balanced feed.</p>
<p>Nutritionists tell us that we should have a 4 to 1 ration of omega6 to omega3 but most Americans are at a 10 to 1 up to a 40 to 1 ratio.  Most nutritionists don&#8217;t even count beef and pork as having any omega3 content.  Hence the view of the &#8216;natural food&#8217; people that animals need to be pasture fed because it is  the original photosynthesis cells of grass or algae that produce and contain omega3.  The other major lipid missing would then be lysine which is necessary for rapid weight gain.  It can be found in the DDG of barley based ethanol so a fairly complete diet can be produced from DDG&#8217;s if the right feed stock is used in appropriate proportions.</p>
<p>The total range of products from farm based ethanol needs to be considered and there are some wonderful opportunities out there.  The one down side to corn is that high yields are dependent on significant nitrogen fertilization.  This can result in runoff damaging streams and our waterways.  But there are good ethanol feed-stock plants that can help solve that problem too.  Anybody have any information on no till farming and co-cropping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonnieB</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-6870</link>
		<dc:creator>LonnieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-6870</guid>
		<description>Detroit, Madison Avenue and Big Oil exist on disinformation. They pretened to give us what we have been lead to believe we want (SUV&#039;s?), when in reality it&#039;s more like &quot;This is our product, now let&#039;s make the public believe they want it!&quot;



They produce pathetically inefficient &quot;FlexFuel&quot; vehicles for the &quot;feel good&quot; crowd. Due to their low compression ratio (approx. 8.5 to 1), these vehicles do not run worth a tinker&#039;s damn on E85, thus perpetuating the myths about ethanol that their Big Oil bedmates find so helpful.



GM&#039;s &quot;Yellow Cap&quot; campaign is another good example of how Detroit bamboozles consumers. If you bought one of their gas guzzlers over the past few years, they send you a cute little yellow gas cap for the GM urban assault vehicle (a.k.a. SUV) you bought, saying &quot;By the way, did you know your vehicle can already run on E85?&quot; This, after all the gas price hikes have taken place.

In other words, the consumer COULD have been running on E85 @ $2.65 per gallon (however inefficiently) the whole time they were having to pay nearly $4.00 per gallon for Big Oil&#039;s product.

Hmmm....collusion, ya think? The two are joined at the hip, why would we expect anything else from these mutant siamese twins.

They remind me of the old Lily Tomlin skit about what her telephone operator character (forgot the name)  said &quot;We&#039;re the phone company (inseart Big Oil &amp; Detriot). We don&#039;t care, because we don&#039;t have to!&quot;



Okay, that&#039;s my rant.



CNCMike....I&#039;ve read several of your posts, and it&#039;s clear that you are mechanically saavy. I am developing a business plan to produce E85 powered crate engines. I would really welcome any discussion with you about the effects, pro or con, of ethanol on the engine. Is there some way to communicate off this site, via email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit, Madison Avenue and Big Oil exist on disinformation. They pretened to give us what we have been lead to believe we want (SUV&#8217;s?), when in reality it&#8217;s more like &#8220;This is our product, now let&#8217;s make the public believe they want it!&#8221;</p>
<p>They produce pathetically inefficient &#8220;FlexFuel&#8221; vehicles for the &#8220;feel good&#8221; crowd. Due to their low compression ratio (approx. 8.5 to 1), these vehicles do not run worth a tinker&#8217;s damn on E85, thus perpetuating the myths about ethanol that their Big Oil bedmates find so helpful.</p>
<p>GM&#8217;s &#8220;Yellow Cap&#8221; campaign is another good example of how Detroit bamboozles consumers. If you bought one of their gas guzzlers over the past few years, they send you a cute little yellow gas cap for the GM urban assault vehicle (a.k.a. SUV) you bought, saying &#8220;By the way, did you know your vehicle can already run on E85?&#8221; This, after all the gas price hikes have taken place.</p>
<p>In other words, the consumer COULD have been running on E85 @ $2.65 per gallon (however inefficiently) the whole time they were having to pay nearly $4.00 per gallon for Big Oil&#8217;s product.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.collusion, ya think? The two are joined at the hip, why would we expect anything else from these mutant siamese twins.</p>
<p>They remind me of the old Lily Tomlin skit about what her telephone operator character (forgot the name)  said &#8220;We&#8217;re the phone company (inseart Big Oil &amp; Detriot). We don&#8217;t care, because we don&#8217;t have to!&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, that&#8217;s my rant.</p>
<p>CNCMike&#8230;.I&#8217;ve read several of your posts, and it&#8217;s clear that you are mechanically saavy. I am developing a business plan to produce E85 powered crate engines. I would really welcome any discussion with you about the effects, pro or con, of ethanol on the engine. Is there some way to communicate off this site, via email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonnieB</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/11/26/ethanol-industry-wants-to-join-forces-with-car-makers/#comment-29024</link>
		<dc:creator>LonnieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=1316#comment-29024</guid>
		<description>Detroit, Madison Avenue and Big Oil exist on disinformation. They pretened to give us what we have been lead to believe we want (SUV&#039;s?), when in reality it&#039;s more like &quot;This is our product, now let&#039;s make the public believe they want it!&quot;



They produce pathetically inefficient &quot;FlexFuel&quot; vehicles for the &quot;feel good&quot; crowd. Due to their low compression ratio (approx. 8.5 to 1), these vehicles do not run worth a tinker&#039;s damn on E85, thus perpetuating the myths about ethanol that their Big Oil bedmates find so helpful.



GM&#039;s &quot;Yellow Cap&quot; campaign is another good example of how Detroit bamboozles consumers. If you bought one of their gas guzzlers over the past few years, they send you a cute little yellow gas cap for the GM urban assault vehicle (a.k.a. SUV) you bought, saying &quot;By the way, did you know your vehicle can already run on E85?&quot; This, after all the gas price hikes have taken place.

In other words, the consumer COULD have been running on E85 @ $2.65 per gallon (however inefficiently) the whole time they were having to pay nearly $4.00 per gallon for Big Oil&#039;s product.

Hmmm....collusion, ya think? The two are joined at the hip, why would we expect anything else from these mutant siamese twins.

They remind me of the old Lily Tomlin skit about what her telephone operator character (forgot the name)  said &quot;We&#039;re the phone company (inseart Big Oil &amp; Detriot). We don&#039;t care, because we don&#039;t have to!&quot;



Okay, that&#039;s my rant.



CNCMike....I&#039;ve read several of your posts, and it&#039;s clear that you are mechanically saavy. I am developing a business plan to produce E85 powered crate engines. I would really welcome any discussion with you about the effects, pro or con, of ethanol on the engine. Is there some way to communicate off this site, via email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit, Madison Avenue and Big Oil exist on disinformation. They pretened to give us what we have been lead to believe we want (SUV&#8217;s?), when in reality it&#8217;s more like &#8220;This is our product, now let&#8217;s make the public believe they want it!&#8221;</p>
<p>They produce pathetically inefficient &#8220;FlexFuel&#8221; vehicles for the &#8220;feel good&#8221; crowd. Due to their low compression ratio (approx. 8.5 to 1), these vehicles do not run worth a tinker&#8217;s damn on E85, thus perpetuating the myths about ethanol that their Big Oil bedmates find so helpful.</p>
<p>GM&#8217;s &#8220;Yellow Cap&#8221; campaign is another good example of how Detroit bamboozles consumers. If you bought one of their gas guzzlers over the past few years, they send you a cute little yellow gas cap for the GM urban assault vehicle (a.k.a. SUV) you bought, saying &#8220;By the way, did you know your vehicle can already run on E85?&#8221; This, after all the gas price hikes have taken place.</p>
<p>In other words, the consumer COULD have been running on E85 @ $2.65 per gallon (however inefficiently) the whole time they were having to pay nearly $4.00 per gallon for Big Oil&#8217;s product.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.collusion, ya think? The two are joined at the hip, why would we expect anything else from these mutant siamese twins.</p>
<p>They remind me of the old Lily Tomlin skit about what her telephone operator character (forgot the name)  said &#8220;We&#8217;re the phone company (inseart Big Oil &amp; Detriot). We don&#8217;t care, because we don&#8217;t have to!&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, that&#8217;s my rant.</p>
<p>CNCMike&#8230;.I&#8217;ve read several of your posts, and it&#8217;s clear that you are mechanically saavy. I am developing a business plan to produce E85 powered crate engines. I would really welcome any discussion with you about the effects, pro or con, of ethanol on the engine. Is there some way to communicate off this site, via email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

