AND:http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news12.17c.html

AND:http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news12.17c.html

AND:http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news12.17c.html

Wouldn’t an electrical charge through a molecule cause the atoms within to draw a little closer, thus making the droplets smaller and less frictional?

Wouldn’t a more thorough burn increase combustion chamber pressure, resulting in higher fuel efficiency in lower octane fuels? As well as increase acceleration response and horsepower and/or low end torque?

Since an internal combustion engine is essentially an air pump, wouldn’t increasing to air part of the fuel air ratio to interact with the fuel part of the ratio be a good thing?

Being a former Air Force jet engine mechanic, I am familiar with the importance of efficient fuel atomization. Bad atomization can kill a jet engine. So it only stands to reason the more efficient atomization can only be good for a piston engine. Am I wrong?

As to the question of increased chamber temperatures “melting” cylinder heads, or whatever. I believe that to be highly unlikely. Carbon deposits increase head and piston temperatures because they retain heat and retard the heat transfer capacity of the metal. These deposits are created by the inherent incomplete burning of petroleum based fuels and the additives in them. More thorough burning minimizes these deposits and allows the cooling jackets to do their job more efficiently. Am I missing something?

Another recently developed product that achieves higher chamber pressures and more thorough burn is the “pulse plug”, developed in conjunction with Sandia Laboratories. It deliver, via built in capacitors, 1 MILLION watts of energy per firing, as opposed to the average 500 watts. A friend installed them in his 2007 Xterra and his highway mileage jumped from 17 to 24. He has had them for 2 months and has ahd NO problem with higher than normal temperatures. He has, however, had to lighten up on the gas pedal, due to an increased rate of acceleration.

I’m ordering mine next month. (They cost $25 a piece and I have a V8, as well as a kid in college!)

Am I nuts?

Wouldn’t an electrical charge through a molecule cause the atoms within to draw a little closer, thus making the droplets smaller and less frictional?

Wouldn’t a more thorough burn increase combustion chamber pressure, resulting in higher fuel efficiency in lower octane fuels? As well as increase acceleration response and horsepower and/or low end torque?

Since an internal combustion engine is essentially an air pump, wouldn’t increasing to air part of the fuel air ratio to interact with the fuel part of the ratio be a good thing?

Being a former Air Force jet engine mechanic, I am familiar with the importance of efficient fuel atomization. Bad atomization can kill a jet engine. So it only stands to reason the more efficient atomization can only be good for a piston engine. Am I wrong?

As to the question of increased chamber temperatures “melting” cylinder heads, or whatever. I believe that to be highly unlikely. Carbon deposits increase head and piston temperatures because they retain heat and retard the heat transfer capacity of the metal. These deposits are created by the inherent incomplete burning of petroleum based fuels and the additives in them. More thorough burning minimizes these deposits and allows the cooling jackets to do their job more efficiently. Am I missing something?

Another recently developed product that achieves higher chamber pressures and more thorough burn is the “pulse plug”, developed in conjunction with Sandia Laboratories. It deliver, via built in capacitors, 1 MILLION watts of energy per firing, as opposed to the average 500 watts. A friend installed them in his 2007 Xterra and his highway mileage jumped from 17 to 24. He has had them for 2 months and has ahd NO problem with higher than normal temperatures. He has, however, had to lighten up on the gas pedal, due to an increased rate of acceleration.

I’m ordering mine next month. (They cost $25 a piece and I have a V8, as well as a kid in college!)

Am I nuts?

Wouldn’t an electrical charge through a molecule cause the atoms within to draw a little closer, thus making the droplets smaller and less frictional?

Wouldn’t a more thorough burn increase combustion chamber pressure, resulting in higher fuel efficiency in lower octane fuels? As well as increase acceleration response and horsepower and/or low end torque?

Since an internal combustion engine is essentially an air pump, wouldn’t increasing to air part of the fuel air ratio to interact with the fuel part of the ratio be a good thing?

Being a former Air Force jet engine mechanic, I am familiar with the importance of efficient fuel atomization. Bad atomization can kill a jet engine. So it only stands to reason the more efficient atomization can only be good for a piston engine. Am I wrong?

As to the question of increased chamber temperatures “melting” cylinder heads, or whatever. I believe that to be highly unlikely. Carbon deposits increase head and piston temperatures because they retain heat and retard the heat transfer capacity of the metal. These deposits are created by the inherent incomplete burning of petroleum based fuels and the additives in them. More thorough burning minimizes these deposits and allows the cooling jackets to do their job more efficiently. Am I missing something?

Another recently developed product that achieves higher chamber pressures and more thorough burn is the “pulse plug”, developed in conjunction with Sandia Laboratories. It deliver, via built in capacitors, 1 MILLION watts of energy per firing, as opposed to the average 500 watts. A friend installed them in his 2007 Xterra and his highway mileage jumped from 17 to 24. He has had them for 2 months and has ahd NO problem with higher than normal temperatures. He has, however, had to lighten up on the gas pedal, due to an increased rate of acceleration.

I’m ordering mine next month. (They cost $25 a piece and I have a V8, as well as a kid in college!)

Am I nuts?

Also, smaller droplets, while not affecting the fuel/air ratio as was mentioned above, will burn faster, making for a more explosive combustion than normal. This could cause excessive wear, higher peak pressure/temperature and affect the tuning of the engine. It may not be a good thing to do to an engine that was not designed for this.

Also, smaller droplets, while not affecting the fuel/air ratio as was mentioned above, will burn faster, making for a more explosive combustion than normal. This could cause excessive wear, higher peak pressure/temperature and affect the tuning of the engine. It may not be a good thing to do to an engine that was not designed for this.

Also, smaller droplets, while not affecting the fuel/air ratio as was mentioned above, will burn faster, making for a more explosive combustion than normal. This could cause excessive wear, higher peak pressure/temperature and affect the tuning of the engine. It may not be a good thing to do to an engine that was not designed for this.

Also, smaller droplets, while not affecting the fuel/air ratio as was mentioned above, will burn faster, making for a more explosive combustion than normal. This could cause excessive wear, higher peak pressure/temperature and affect the tuning of the engine. It may not be a good thing to do to an engine that was not designed for this.