http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/ What is the future of fuel? What's new? What's next? Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction. Thu, 24 May 2012 21:04:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-4700 Muriel Strand, P.E. Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:27:17 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-4700 This sounds like a lot of work just to be able to drive. Simpler to grow something edible instead and just walk to harvest. This sounds like a lot of work just to be able to drive. Simpler to grow something edible instead and just walk to harvest.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27027 Muriel Strand, P.E. Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:27:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27027 This sounds like a lot of work just to be able to drive. Simpler to grow something edible instead and just walk to harvest. This sounds like a lot of work just to be able to drive. Simpler to grow something edible instead and just walk to harvest.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-4699 sceptique Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:00:05 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-4699 I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn't make my favorite food too expensive. I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn’t make my favorite food too expensive.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27024 sceptique Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:00:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27024 I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn't make my favorite food too expensive. I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn’t make my favorite food too expensive.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27025 sceptique Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:00:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27025 I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn't make my favorite food too expensive. I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn’t make my favorite food too expensive.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27026 sceptique Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:00:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27026 I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn't make my favorite food too expensive. I happen to love sugar in all forms; I hope that the commercialization of this venture doesn’t make my favorite food too expensive.

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-4698 my year without Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:40:42 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-4698 "Hey, Sugar!" might mean something less sweet... “Hey, Sugar!” might mean something less sweet…

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27023 my year without Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:40:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27023 "Hey, Sugar!" might mean something less sweet... “Hey, Sugar!” might mean something less sweet…

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-4697 seguin Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:23:51 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-4697 I'm more interested in the "designer hydrocarbons" (i.e. gasoline secreted from genetically modified bacteria)...seems easier to me. Whichever works is fine though, a no-sulfur, no-septane gasoline is probably better for the environment than building batteries, which puts out a ton of pollution. Besides, I don't think I could live without the sound of Packard V-12s... I’m more interested in the “designer hydrocarbons” (i.e. gasoline secreted from genetically modified bacteria)…seems easier to me. Whichever works is fine though, a no-sulfur, no-septane gasoline is probably better for the environment than building batteries, which puts out a ton of pollution. Besides, I don’t think I could live without the sound of Packard V-12s…

]]> http://gas2.org/2008/09/21/new-energy-efficient-process-turns-sugar-into-gasoline/#comment-27022 seguin Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:23:00 +0000 http://gas2.org/?p=971#comment-27022 I'm more interested in the "designer hydrocarbons" (i.e. gasoline secreted from genetically modified bacteria)...seems easier to me. Whichever works is fine though, a no-sulfur, no-septane gasoline is probably better for the environment than building batteries, which puts out a ton of pollution. Besides, I don't think I could live without the sound of Packard V-12s... I’m more interested in the “designer hydrocarbons” (i.e. gasoline secreted from genetically modified bacteria)…seems easier to me. Whichever works is fine though, a no-sulfur, no-septane gasoline is probably better for the environment than building batteries, which puts out a ton of pollution. Besides, I don’t think I could live without the sound of Packard V-12s…

]]>