<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Million New Jobs From a $100B Green Investment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/</link>
	<description>What is the future of fuel?  What&#039;s new?  What&#039;s next?  Since 2007, Gas 2 has covered a rapidly changing world coming to terms with its oil addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin K.</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-4673</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-4673</guid>
		<description>Where is that $100 billion going to come from?  I know they don&#039;t have it and they won&#039;t make any cuts because of it.  It sounds like good news for those who need jobs, but it will hurt the rest who have jobs.  Some will see their income rise but some won&#039;t and the prices of everything will be rising from the new influx of capital.



I think I feel a Green bubble coming on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is that $100 billion going to come from?  I know they don&#8217;t have it and they won&#8217;t make any cuts because of it.  It sounds like good news for those who need jobs, but it will hurt the rest who have jobs.  Some will see their income rise but some won&#8217;t and the prices of everything will be rising from the new influx of capital.</p>
<p>I think I feel a Green bubble coming on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin K.</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-26999</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-26999</guid>
		<description>Where is that $100 billion going to come from?  I know they don&#039;t have it and they won&#039;t make any cuts because of it.  It sounds like good news for those who need jobs, but it will hurt the rest who have jobs.  Some will see their income rise but some won&#039;t and the prices of everything will be rising from the new influx of capital.



I think I feel a Green bubble coming on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is that $100 billion going to come from?  I know they don&#8217;t have it and they won&#8217;t make any cuts because of it.  It sounds like good news for those who need jobs, but it will hurt the rest who have jobs.  Some will see their income rise but some won&#8217;t and the prices of everything will be rising from the new influx of capital.</p>
<p>I think I feel a Green bubble coming on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is Geothermal?</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-4672</link>
		<dc:creator>Where is Geothermal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-4672</guid>
		<description>Wind is awesome and solar is too, but they have not mentioned anything about geothermal. Geothermal is not finicky about whether the wind blows or the sun shines. It will work 24/7, and there are no major hurtles to overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind is awesome and solar is too, but they have not mentioned anything about geothermal. Geothermal is not finicky about whether the wind blows or the sun shines. It will work 24/7, and there are no major hurtles to overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is Geothermal?</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-26998</link>
		<dc:creator>Where is Geothermal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-26998</guid>
		<description>Wind is awesome and solar is too, but they have not mentioned anything about geothermal. Geothermal is not finicky about whether the wind blows or the sun shines. It will work 24/7, and there are no major hurtles to overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind is awesome and solar is too, but they have not mentioned anything about geothermal. Geothermal is not finicky about whether the wind blows or the sun shines. It will work 24/7, and there are no major hurtles to overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Robins</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>As this piece makes clear, green jobs come from green investments. Anyone interested in looking at green investing will m=find my site worthwhile. It covers the latest global news and research on green-ethical investing. It&#039;s at http://investingforthesoul.com/



Best wishes, Ron Robins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this piece makes clear, green jobs come from green investments. Anyone interested in looking at green investing will m=find my site worthwhile. It covers the latest global news and research on green-ethical investing. It&#8217;s at <a href="http://investingforthesoul.com/" rel="nofollow">http://investingforthesoul.com/</a></p>
<p>Best wishes, Ron Robins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Robins</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-26997</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-26997</guid>
		<description>As this piece makes clear, green jobs come from green investments. Anyone interested in looking at green investing will m=find my site worthwhile. It covers the latest global news and research on green-ethical investing. It&#039;s at http://investingforthesoul.com/



Best wishes, Ron Robins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this piece makes clear, green jobs come from green investments. Anyone interested in looking at green investing will m=find my site worthwhile. It covers the latest global news and research on green-ethical investing. It&#8217;s at <a href="http://investingforthesoul.com/" rel="nofollow">http://investingforthesoul.com/</a></p>
<p>Best wishes, Ron Robins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Buildup</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Buildup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>What this really points to is a dire need for a consortium of green energy companies to lobby the Feds HARD to make this investment happen. I think they could make a serious case for such an investment if they could come up with a realistic way to apportion this investment.  None of this &quot;$50 billion for new battery research&quot; to a single organization.  No, there should be a way to apportion this investment to all the promising technologies we&#039;ve read about here in this blog. Right now the only consortiums I&#039;ve heard about are technoology-specific, like ethanol producers.  But we need ethanol, biodiesel, wind, solar, and a few others to push together on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this really points to is a dire need for a consortium of green energy companies to lobby the Feds HARD to make this investment happen. I think they could make a serious case for such an investment if they could come up with a realistic way to apportion this investment.  None of this &#8220;$50 billion for new battery research&#8221; to a single organization.  No, there should be a way to apportion this investment to all the promising technologies we&#8217;ve read about here in this blog. Right now the only consortiums I&#8217;ve heard about are technoology-specific, like ethanol producers.  But we need ethanol, biodiesel, wind, solar, and a few others to push together on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Buildup</title>
		<link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/19/two-million-new-jobs-from-a-100b-green-investment/#comment-26996</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Buildup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/?p=967#comment-26996</guid>
		<description>What this really points to is a dire need for a consortium of green energy companies to lobby the Feds HARD to make this investment happen. I think they could make a serious case for such an investment if they could come up with a realistic way to apportion this investment.  None of this &quot;$50 billion for new battery research&quot; to a single organization.  No, there should be a way to apportion this investment to all the promising technologies we&#039;ve read about here in this blog. Right now the only consortiums I&#039;ve heard about are technoology-specific, like ethanol producers.  But we need ethanol, biodiesel, wind, solar, and a few others to push together on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this really points to is a dire need for a consortium of green energy companies to lobby the Feds HARD to make this investment happen. I think they could make a serious case for such an investment if they could come up with a realistic way to apportion this investment.  None of this &#8220;$50 billion for new battery research&#8221; to a single organization.  No, there should be a way to apportion this investment to all the promising technologies we&#8217;ve read about here in this blog. Right now the only consortiums I&#8217;ve heard about are technoology-specific, like ethanol producers.  But we need ethanol, biodiesel, wind, solar, and a few others to push together on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

