Gasification: Ultra-Cheap Biofuel From Any Carbon Source

Microporous Syngas-Ethanol CatalystUnder a new research directive at Ames National Laboratory, scientists are honing in on a way to perfect a process called gasification to create cheap ethanol from almost any carbon source without fermentation.

If they’re successful, crops, agricultural waste, lawn clippings, raked leaves, sewage sludge and garbage could all be turned into ethanol using the same efficient process, in the same facility, under one roof.

We’ve covered the process of gasification for ethanol production before, but this new research appears to be a huge step forward in making ethanol using gasification.

Although cellulosic ethanol made from non-food plant material and garbage is already rising quickly as the next viable source of second generation biofuel, its current production method has many built-in inefficiencies.

The current process involves the use of acids and/or heat, enzymes and fermenting microbes to get from the harvested plant material or garbage to a fuel that is usable in your car’s engine — all of which add up to significant inputs of money, time and energy.

If all of those extra steps could be cut out of the process of turning plant material or garbage into ethanol, the efficiency would go up and the amount of energy actually gained from the process would increase too.

This energy gain is important because one of the main criticisms of ethanol, and biofuels in general, is that they are an inefficient way of making fuel and, some argue, actually take more energy to produce than they put out — although this claim is very much debatable, and most probably wrong.

So how does gasification work and what are some of its problems?

Gasification is a process that turns carbon-based feedstocks under high temperature and pressure in an oxygen-controlled environment into synthesis gas, or syngas. The syngas can then be converted into ethanol using a catalyst.

Syngas is made up primarily of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (more than 85 percent by volume) and smaller quantities of carbon dioxide and methane. It is the carbon monoxide fraction of syngas that is converted to ethanol as it passes over a catalyst.

Ironically, although the Ames scientists envision gasification ethanol as the way of the future, the actual gasification process has been known about and used for the better part of 200 years.

Gas produced from the gasification of coal was used to light street lamps and for cooking before the invention of the light bulb and widespread production of electricity and natural gas.

In fact, people have known for a long time that gasification of carbon-based materials can directly produce ethanol when reacted with a catalyst— it’s just that, up till now, the process also produced a lot of undesirable and potentially toxic byproducts along with the ethanol.

Apparently not one to let 200 years of status quo get him down, Ames chemist Victor Lin set out to find a way to get rid of these undesireable byproducts of the gasification syngas-to-ethanol process and increase the yield of ethanol.

Along the way, his research group discovered they could greatly increase the amount of carbon monoxide generated by using a porous foam-like material in which all the interior surfaces were coated with the metal alloy catalyst.

This provided a huge amount of surface area on which the syngas could react with the catalyst, thereby enhancing carbon monoxide generation and, in turn, increasing the amount of ethanol produced while largely eliminating the undesirable byproducts.

The beauty of gasification is that it converts all of the input material (whole plants, garbage, etc.) into ethanol. In contrast, the acid/heat/fermentation process always leaves behind materials that cannot be converted to ethanol by microbes. As Dr. Lin says:

“The great thing about using syngas to produce ethanol is that it expands the kinds of materials that can be converted into fuels. You can use the waste product from the distilling process or any number of other sources of biomass, such as switchgrass or wood pulp. Basically any carbon-based material can be converted into syngas. And once we have syngas, we can turn that into ethanol.”

I’m excited and curious to see where this research leads as it seems like one of the most promising developments I’ve run across recently. Let’s hope they can get it to the demonstration phase quickly.

Anybody else out there have experience with syngas production or ethanol production from syngas without fermentation?

Posts Related to Gasification and Cellulosic Ethanol:

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

5 Comments

  1. It still has the problem of being less efficient than fossil fuels and requiring a different infrastructure. Burning ethanol to acquire and distribute more ethanol sounds like a very inefficient cycle.

  2. “Anybody else out there have experience with syngas production or ethanol production from syngas without fermentation?”

    http://www.syntecbiofuel.com
    http://www.fulcrum-bioenergy.com
    http://www.rangfuels.com

  3. Why go to all this trouble, just build a plasma incinerator, send the syngas through the catlist and harvest both power and ethonal from the closed loop cycle.

  4. We, the American fuel consumer, tend to have a very narrow view of the fuels we consume. When we talk in terms of “efficiency”, what we are really saying is that a gallon of gasoline gets us 20% further down the road than a gallon of ethanol, and therefore is more efficient because we have to buy less of it. And that’s where the consumer’s thought process usually ends.
    What it costs to explore for, drill for refine and transport fossil fuels is rarely considered, because we only see the end product.
    Even though the human (war) and environmental (global warming) costs are shown on the nightly news, we tend not to make the connection and blame it all on one political party or another.
    We are a confused lot. We drive our petroleum burning cars and trucks to “No Blood For Oil” protest rallies, dressed in clothing that was manufactured and transported by petroleum dependant industries, then go to restaurants that cook food that was raised, processed and transported by petroleum dependant industies on stoves and grilles that are powered by petroleum dependant power plants.
    Efficiency is a term we have a hard time wrapping our minds around. We need to stop splitting the term into politically convenient fragments and look at it as a whole entity.
    Switching to ethanol, or better yet, celluline, opens many opportunities all along the consumer scale.
    For instance, as I have posted on other threads, I am developing a business producing high performance ethanol-burning crate engines for sale to individuals who wish to swap out their petroleum burning engines.
    I am also looking for acreage to raise switchgrass and/or Jerusalem artichokes for sale to ethanol plants.
    Both of these endeavors will employ several workers and help move America toward energy independence.
    Rather than stomp around with hateful little signs protesting “war for oil”, I am actually doing something toward the day when America can tell OPEC to stuff it, and we won’t have to keep the oil flowing with American blood.
    I know I am not the only one. Americans are too great a people for that. The problem is, we have forgotten what “sacrifice” means. We feel entitled to never have to do that. Until we change that mindset, we will never rise above petty politcal squabbling, and in fact may well descend into mediocrity among nations.
    I will now deflated my portable soapbox. Contributions of intelligent reasoning and inovation will be gladly accepted by America!

Tell us what you think:

Automotive Links

Find car reviews on Hybrid Cars such as Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid, Honda Civic, Smart Car, Toyota Prius and many more.