Have Your Saturn Converted to an All-Electric Car
Starting later this year, Advanced Mechanical Products (AMP), a company based in Cincinnati, Ohio, will take your pre-existing or newly purchased Saturn Sky and convert it to an electric car.

Initially only available for the Sky, AMP will add other Saturn models as company growth allows.
The company is currently taking orders for a limited run of 300 “signature series” Sky conversions. The Sky EV will be able to go from 0-60 mph (0-97 kph) in 5.7 seconds, will have a top speed of 90 mph (145 kph), and can go 150 miles (240 kilometers) before needing a recharge.
- » See also: Is the Renault-Nissan Alliance Going in Two Different Electric Car Directions?
- » Get Gas 2.0 by RSS or sign up by email.
AMP claims that the Sky EV gets 125 miles per gallon equivalent fuel economy based on how much energy it takes to charge the batteries. At current energy prices, this will cost you around 3 cents (US) a mile.
Additionally, because the car is all-electric, it produces zero tailpipe emissions and has many other added side benefits such as no oil changes, no regular tune-ups, no clutch, no transmission fluid and no differential fluid — all of which could add up to significant savings over the life of the vehicle beyond obvious savings on fuel costs.
The rub: AMP electric conversion costs $25,000 on top of the purchase price of your conventional Saturn Sky. Given that the Sky costs about $28,000 for the base model plus a reasonable amount of options, the final price of the conversion will run you about $53,000.
Hooo boy…. At first glance this is definetely not a working man’s electric car. I’ve covered electric car conversion companies before, and the company line is that over the lifespan of the car, the conversion pays for itself.
I’ve always been skeptical of these claims, so I decided to compare the AMP Sky EV to a stock Saturn Sky Red Line on a true cost to own basis. The Sky Red Line is the better performing of the two conventional Sky models (5.5 seconds to 60 mph), and it also happens to have the better fuel mileage (19 city, 28 Hwy).
I wanted to calculate total cost over a period of time to own both vehicles from a “regular Joe’s” perspective. This means that both cars would have a down payment and require a loan for 5 years at 7% interest.
Given that AMP requires a $10,000 deposit and most people put a couple thousand dollars down on the purchase of a new vehicle, I made my calculations assuming a $12,000 down payment on both the conventional Sky and the Sky EV.
I know that $12,000 is stretching it for most people’s budgets, but it’s the only way I could make a fair comparison.
I also assumed 15,000 miles per year driving — 50% highway and 50% city at $4.00 per gallon of gas or 3 cents per mile of electricity. Another assumption: the Sky EV will save you about $150 per year in tune-ups and oil changes over the conventional Sky. My results are summed up in the table below.
| Model | Purchase Price | Yearly Loan Payment | Energy $/Yr. | Total Cost $/Yr. | 5 Yr. Cost to Own | 10 Yr. Cost to Own | 15 Yr. Cost to Own |
| Saturn Sky Red Line | $32,000 | $4,752 | $2,573 | $7,475 | $49,375 | $62,238 | $75,101 |
| AMP Sky EV | $53,000 | $9,742 | $437 | $10,179 | $62,895 | $65,079 | $67,263 |
The total cost per year for the Red Line includes the $150 in tune ups. The cost to own for both cars includes the $12,000 down payment. After 5 years, the loan is paid off so the only costs from that point forward are service and energy.
As you can see, and solely on a monetary cost to the owner basis, the 5 year cost to own clearly shows that the conventional Sky will save you about $13,500. After 10 years they cost about the same and after 15 years the Sky EV has finally pulled ahead.
So, in reality, It’ll take you about 10 years before the EV premium pays for itself. Obviously if you drive more than 15,000 miles per year, that EV premium will be paid off faster. For instance, if you drive 30,000 miles a year (80 miles a day, 50% highway/50% city) it would take half the time for the EV conversion to pay for itself.
Of course, it’s impossible to put a value on the reduced emissions and foreign fuel usage from driving an electric vehicle; that’s entirely personal. But to an increasing amount of folks, it is truly worth the premium — and AMP is surely banking on this segment of society to turn a profit.
Posts Related to Electric Cars and Electric Conversions:
- Plug-in Hybrid Drivers are Charged Up
- Aptera Electric Car Closer to Production After Cash Infusion
- How to Build an Electric Car Charging Infrastructure: Smart Grids, Fast Charging and Universal Access
- Company Turns Familiar Gas Cars Into Electric Vehicles
- Tesla Begins Popping Roadster EVs Off Production Line
- Get 120 MPG Out of Your Prius (Plug It In)
- Sick of Gas?: Convert Your Car To Run On Electricity
- An Electric Car With Muscle: The 175 MPGe X1 Prototype by Wrightspeed Inc.
- Inflatable Electric Cars: Surround Your Body in Bliss
- An Electric Car You Can Buy Today: The $20K TRIAC EV
- Snapshot of Battery Technology for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Cars







Most electric car’s battery life expectancy is 100,000 miles before it needs to be replaced at a substantial cost. Figuring 15K miles/year that’s about 7 years so this calculation /comparison must include at least two replacement battery packs – that would substantially alter the equation, don’t you think?
Nothing like fraudulent computations. Everyone else on the planet knows that the batteries in this car won’t last for more than 5 years, or a thousand or so recharges. They will cost at least $15,000 to replace, which makes your calculations incredibly dumb
and inaccurate. And those “maintenance costs” you claim are mostly phoney baloney - tune ups come at 100,000 miels and cost about $12 for spark plugs. Tranny fluid changes? Are you kidding? Figure $20 for 100,000 miles. And do you really believe that you can go where you want in this vehcile, whoch has a realistic driving radius (after a few years) of less than 60 miles? Get real, felllow. Battery-only electrics are oxymorons for gullible yokels who don’t know any better. They can’t avoid as much gasoline of emissions as a Chevy Volt, since all those trips that can’t be made using this car will be made using a gas powered vehicle that will consume tons more gasoline and emit lots more carbon thn the 40 miles electric range/50 MPG liquid fuel mileage abilities of the Volt.
Kerry,
TROLL ALERT!
At first I was going to delete Mr. “Bradshaw’s” comment because I know who he is and that he gets paid by Big Oil lobbying groups to paint electric cars as the second coming of the apocalypse. He’s spouted complete BS propaganda doubt-generating crapola on other posts of mine.
But then I thought that a little education of you, our excellent readership, and an expose of KBs tactics would be just the ticket.
So, without further adieu, read the following link to find out who kerry Bradshaw really is… and pass the info on.
http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/off-topic/672-ken-kent-kerry-beauchrt-beuchert-beuchrt-biker-rider-krider.html
You’re assuming that gas is going to stay at $4.00 per gallon for 5-15 years and the maintenance costs also are unrealistically low.
Hey, did you forget gas prices will only go up? And probably at a far greater rate than electricity prices increase? You can’t look at a 10 year ownership timeframe without considering that gas could very well be $10/gallon in that time.
[...] Have Your Saturn Converted to an All-Electric Car [...]