Save Gas Without Losing Your Shirt: 3 Gas Saving Devices with High Scam Potential
Fuel saving scams, er, devices, have been around for a long time, and now that fuel prices are soaring again, we decided it would be a good time to take a look at a few of the most popular and interesting ones out there.
Since the start of the Iraq War in 2003, oil prices have jumped from $28 per barrel to over $130, with most of that rise occurring in the last year. This fact is made even more stark considering that for all of the last century prior to the current meteoric rise, crude oil prices have averaged about $20 per barrel (adjusted for inflation).
Economists and pundits continue to tussle over who or what is to blame for this, and I could hypothesize about how we’re all being taken to the cleaners by corporate greed, but that’d be a waste of energy, no? The important issue is that fuel costs have gone past the “arm-and-a-leg” stage and are now approaching “firstborn son.”
So, while I’d love to say that hydrocarbon fuel prices don’t matter because we’ve entered the hybrid-biofuel- electric-fuel-cell-hydrogen society, the reality is that I need a fix for my old jalopy quick… and what better place to start than a perusal of some of the spectacular deals to be had on the internet?
First up: FuelMAX
Better living through magnets, grandad always said. FuelMAX is a magnetic device that you attach to your car’s fuel line to “fracture gasoline hydrocarbon chains through magnetic resonance.” According to the company this could increase your mileage by 27% along with a whole host of other interesting side effects.
Unfortunately, you can’t buy FuelMAX anymore (in the US that is - in Latvia it’s still alive and well). Apparently, it was so popular and worked so well that the US Federal Trade Commission told FuelMAX’s parent company, International Research and Development, to take it off the US market and give people their money back.
Damn big brother, always destroying the hopes and dreams of fledgling corporations. Not to worry though, there are a myriad of other companies out there that sell essentially the same thing and who the Feds have left alone up to this point. Some even go so far as to not only put magnets on the fuel line, but also on the coolant and air intake (Video).
My Take: Magnet fuel savers work so well that the US government is involved in a conspiracy to systematically remove them from existence.
Next up: Cyclone Fuel Saver
When I was younger we used to watch hours of late night infomercials for fun. You know, the kind where they cover a car in a special wax made of what looks like cosmic fairy dust, and then they shoot a laser at it to show those microscopic fairies in action deflecting the laser from your beautiful car?
In retrospect, watching infomercials for fun was kind of lame, but if I hadn’t, I wouldn’t have fond memories of products like the Cyclone Fuel Saver. This baby purports to create “a swirling air motion, allowing the air to move faster and more efficiently by continuously whirling air around corners and bends.” Which does what exactly? Apparently the swirling effect helps “atomise the air/fuel mixture in the combustion chamber” which results in a “more complete and efficient burning of the fuel.”
Wow. That sounds totally rad. And I bet it works too. If for some reason you can’t get your hands on one, not to worry, there are lots of other air intake modifications to be had. For instance, the Turbonator comes with “FlowTru™” technology which allows for the maximum amount of air to get to your engine. Also, if you’re inclined to dig around on such things, the Turbonator will make you instantly more popular with women as evidenced in this photo.
My Take: The Cyclone Fuel Saver must not work that well because the Feds haven’t shut it down yet and its been around for at least 10 years.
Last, but for sure not least: Water4Gas
Although instantly less cool than other fuel savers because it’s not technically a product and more of a description, Water4Gas has been getting a lot of the limelight recently… as it should. I mean, this company website has it all: vibrant color schemes, third-grade HTML proficiency, a video featuring Jimmy Carter, endless scrolling possibilities, and a money back guarantee from some guy named Ozzie Freedom. Ozzie Friggin Freedom. With a name like that he must be on the up-and-up.
Plus, Water4Gas has been tested on like 30 continents, or something, further proving its reliability. For only $97 you can get access to some online manuals that describe how you can spend a minimum of another $100 to modify your car to inject “hydrogen-on-demand” into your engine. Sounds like a winner to me. Mr. Freedom even has his own fan club that provides an unbiased and totally trustworthy review of the Water4Gas system.
Actually, of the three fuel saving systems included in this article, the Water4Gas type seems to have a very loyal following. Known alternatively as “waterhybrids” or “HHO systems,” some of them have been tested by seemingly reputable news organizations with actual positive results. However, based on the fact that advertisements on the Hydro4000 website make it look like the news station and Hydro4000 are in on some kind of scheme together, my trust in the news story is quite low. Plus, at $1,200 you’d have to have a major stash of money set aside for delusions of grandeur to actually buy one of these things.
My Take: The Water4Gas website is so bad that it must be a good product.
All joking aside, the sane part of my mind screams to me that these waterhybrid claims are so far gone that the products can’t be for real. Yet, as much as it pains me, I’ve got to say the jury’s still out on this one. Anybody have any personal experience they care to share? Any idea of how much energy is required to split water into its component parts and the ensuing energy balance (or imbalance) that would be present in a waterhybrid?
A recent post on Gas 2.0 details a system similar to waterhybrids that appears to have the backing of a university. That post generated some good cautionary comments regarding free energy, conservation of energy, and overall energy efficiency of a whole system such as an entire automobile. Any further thoughts on this topic?
Reality Check
Listen folks, if the claims make it seem like a product will do ridiculous things, then its probably a ridiculous product. Most experts say that fuel saving devices are largely scams and that, in lieu of expensive things like buying a more fuel efficient vehicle or completely changing your car’s aerodynamics, the only true way to increase your fuel mileage cheaply is the good old standby of changing your habits to up your car’s efficiency. In fact, in a post on Gas 2.0, Benjamin Jones points us to “100+ EcoDriving Tips to get Better Mileage in Your Car” and Edmunds.com has done its own field testing of many of these recommendations. Check them out and save your money.
Gas 2.0 Posts Related to Fuel Economy:
- How to Get 70 MPG Out of a Honda Civic
- 2009 Jetta BlueTDI Comes to US This Summer, Sports 60 MPG and Cleaner Emissions
- 100+ EcoDriving Tips to get Better Mileage in Your Car
- Can Improved Spark Plugs Boost Both Fuel Economy and Performance?
- Six New Technologies Will Help Manufacturers Reach the 35 MPG Goal (Without Hybrids)
- The World’s Most Fuel Efficient Car: 285 MPG, Not A Hybrid
Image Credit: adapted from d70Focus under Creative Commons
Pretty sure it was a hoax, I googled “watercar hoax” and found that the same person, the hoax perpetrator, was behind all but one of the sites that came up. His sites said it’s not a hoax, honest. But of course, contrary to my ever wide-eyed hopes, it is. My scientist sources say it takes a LOT of energy to unlock hydrogen from the strong molecular bonds holding it in water. The one true hoax-exposing website said that the hoaxer’s device does produce energy for a short time, not from water, but from a process to do with the metal in the equipment used in the electrolyzing process. When the metal is used up, the hydrogen gas can no longer be produced and the device is no longer useful. I’m not sure what the metal is, but I think it’s fairly rare–platinum, titanium, those are kind of wild guesses. I don’t print out everything.
As for the methane/hydrogen similar type process, there are various scientists and one entrepeneur who say they can produce hydrogen in a cell with methanol and water. I think. The entrepeneur, at any rate, said that the feeding the results of the cell into the gasoline combustion process in a regular gas-powered auto makes gasoline 95-98%more clean burning and 30-50% more efficient. The entrepeneur has quite a legitimate looking website and says he already has a deal to produce his cells and install them in a fleet of limousines. The scientists–I think one is at the University of Pennsylvania or Penn State–talked to radio host Ira Flatow on NPR’s Science Friday a few months ago. Just go to the NPR website for the Talk of the Nation Science Friday show.
I’ll try to send you the link to the fuel cell-gas hybrid manufacturer. Thanks for looking into this subject.
test
Hey Tony,
Where’s the clutch on my alternator? I looked all over and coundn’t find what put
the thing into free wheel. Maybe you can
help me on this one. Are you saying that
electro-mechanical drag is going to drian
power to the extent that up to as one other said 40hp? I’m from Missouri I thought the regulator was in there to break
the flow and the Alternator was constant.
saw this on an auto engineering website.
‘Run Your Car On Water’ Scheme Could Leave Consumers All Wet
http://consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/07/water4gas.html
I’ve done a lot of testing on these units and have great results each time. I installed a hydrogen unit with a map/maf enhancer on my 1995 ranger and saw an average of 6mpg increase. I also helped install the same unit on my friends 08 Toyota Yaris. Before the unit he was getting about 38mpg on the highway now if he takes it easy on the highway the best results were 92mpg with an overall average of 84mpg. I was sceptical at first but that was all the evidence I needed.
All of the results listed above were from using Water4Gas plans and devices. To get your own copy of these gas saving plans just go to: http://skfloyd.water4gas.hop.clickbank.net/
Not all fuel saving devices are scams theres a lot out there but its really up to the consumer to make their mind up. The MTECH fuel saver looks pretty good and has the R&D to back it up.
One thing it seems most people miss is the amount of HHO needed to keep the mixture going into the engine I don’t think this system could keep up, if you were to use it you should use a mulitple system so you have a constant supply of HHO but then you will need to suplement the batteries and alternator. You should also consider the fuel mixture and the timing of the engine. If this really worked well I think you would see Nascar and other racing Vehicles using it.
Let’s just put a stop to the high gas prices altogether. We could boycott the oil companies and stop buying gas but we just can’t do without our vehicles. You can convert your vehicle to a water hybrid. To learn more go to http://stoppayingatthepump.com
Water and/or water/methanol induction has probably been around since WW1. One can look through the pre-WW2 “Popular Mechanix” type magazines and see ads for them and articles on how to build them. Essentially a container of HOH or HOH/Methanol is mounted in the engine compartment with an uptake tube running through an adjustable valve to the intake manifold as close to the carburetor as possible. The car is initially started with the valve closed, the engine leaned out and then the valve opened in minute increments until the proper vacuum/mixture level is reached and the valve is locked. This was an ersatz copy of the water/alcohol injection systems used in performance aircraft; the mixture cools the cylinder and helps prevent premature detonation. It works, although how well it would work with an electronic fuel injection system is beyond my ken. These things made a great resurgence during the 1970s fuel crisis & gave me an eye opening introduction into just how dumb allegedly smart lawyers and doctors can be. There are two major, major, problems with the system. #1: the mixture tank can never run dry. If it does the engine will suddenly be sucking additional air into the engine and really screw up the fuel/air ratio and/or act as a vacuum leak. #2: one size does not fit all. Humidity, elevation, temperature and other factors affect the proper balance. The setting made in someone’s garage probably won’t be the best setting for the engine in all operating conditions. In short, the theory behind the system is more or less sound but, to date, the application has been flawed. I hadn’t heard that there are systems promising to split the water into H & O. That would be super spiffy: add the H to the fuel and the O to the air intake. Add the turbinators and the super spark plugs to the 100mpg carb and the owner will have to drain gas out every night to keep his tank from overflowing.