Save Gas Without Losing Your Shirt: 3 Gas Saving Devices with High Scam Potential
Fuel saving scams, er, devices, have been around for a long time, and now that fuel prices are soaring again, we decided it would be a good time to take a look at a few of the most popular and interesting ones out there.
Since the start of the Iraq War in 2003, oil prices have jumped from $28 per barrel to over $130, with most of that rise occurring in the last year. This fact is made even more stark considering that for all of the last century prior to the current meteoric rise, crude oil prices have averaged about $20 per barrel (adjusted for inflation).
Economists and pundits continue to tussle over who or what is to blame for this, and I could hypothesize about how we’re all being taken to the cleaners by corporate greed, but that’d be a waste of energy, no? The important issue is that fuel costs have gone past the “arm-and-a-leg” stage and are now approaching “firstborn son.”
So, while I’d love to say that hydrocarbon fuel prices don’t matter because we’ve entered the hybrid-biofuel- electric-fuel-cell-hydrogen society, the reality is that I need a fix for my old jalopy quick… and what better place to start than a perusal of some of the spectacular deals to be had on the internet?
First up: FuelMAX
Better living through magnets, grandad always said. FuelMAX is a magnetic device that you attach to your car’s fuel line to “fracture gasoline hydrocarbon chains through magnetic resonance.” According to the company this could increase your mileage by 27% along with a whole host of other interesting side effects.
Unfortunately, you can’t buy FuelMAX anymore (in the US that is - in Latvia it’s still alive and well). Apparently, it was so popular and worked so well that the US Federal Trade Commission told FuelMAX’s parent company, International Research and Development, to take it off the US market and give people their money back.
Damn big brother, always destroying the hopes and dreams of fledgling corporations. Not to worry though, there are a myriad of other companies out there that sell essentially the same thing and who the Feds have left alone up to this point. Some even go so far as to not only put magnets on the fuel line, but also on the coolant and air intake (Video).
My Take: Magnet fuel savers work so well that the US government is involved in a conspiracy to systematically remove them from existence.
Next up: Cyclone Fuel Saver
When I was younger we used to watch hours of late night infomercials for fun. You know, the kind where they cover a car in a special wax made of what looks like cosmic fairy dust, and then they shoot a laser at it to show those microscopic fairies in action deflecting the laser from your beautiful car?
In retrospect, watching infomercials for fun was kind of lame, but if I hadn’t, I wouldn’t have fond memories of products like the Cyclone Fuel Saver. This baby purports to create “a swirling air motion, allowing the air to move faster and more efficiently by continuously whirling air around corners and bends.” Which does what exactly? Apparently the swirling effect helps “atomise the air/fuel mixture in the combustion chamber” which results in a “more complete and efficient burning of the fuel.”
Wow. That sounds totally rad. And I bet it works too. If for some reason you can’t get your hands on one, not to worry, there are lots of other air intake modifications to be had. For instance, the Turbonator comes with “FlowTru™” technology which allows for the maximum amount of air to get to your engine. Also, if you’re inclined to dig around on such things, the Turbonator will make you instantly more popular with women as evidenced in this photo.
My Take: The Cyclone Fuel Saver must not work that well because the Feds haven’t shut it down yet and its been around for at least 10 years.
Last, but for sure not least: Water4Gas
Although instantly less cool than other fuel savers because it’s not technically a product and more of a description, Water4Gas has been getting a lot of the limelight recently… as it should. I mean, this company website has it all: vibrant color schemes, third-grade HTML proficiency, a video featuring Jimmy Carter, endless scrolling possibilities, and a money back guarantee from some guy named Ozzie Freedom. Ozzie Friggin Freedom. With a name like that he must be on the up-and-up.
Plus, Water4Gas has been tested on like 30 continents, or something, further proving its reliability. For only $97 you can get access to some online manuals that describe how you can spend a minimum of another $100 to modify your car to inject “hydrogen-on-demand” into your engine. Sounds like a winner to me. Mr. Freedom even has his own fan club that provides an unbiased and totally trustworthy review of the Water4Gas system.
Actually, of the three fuel saving systems included in this article, the Water4Gas type seems to have a very loyal following. Known alternatively as “waterhybrids” or “HHO systems,” some of them have been tested by seemingly reputable news organizations with actual positive results. However, based on the fact that advertisements on the Hydro4000 website make it look like the news station and Hydro4000 are in on some kind of scheme together, my trust in the news story is quite low. Plus, at $1,200 you’d have to have a major stash of money set aside for delusions of grandeur to actually buy one of these things.
My Take: The Water4Gas website is so bad that it must be a good product.
All joking aside, the sane part of my mind screams to me that these waterhybrid claims are so far gone that the products can’t be for real. Yet, as much as it pains me, I’ve got to say the jury’s still out on this one. Anybody have any personal experience they care to share? Any idea of how much energy is required to split water into its component parts and the ensuing energy balance (or imbalance) that would be present in a waterhybrid?
A recent post on Gas 2.0 details a system similar to waterhybrids that appears to have the backing of a university. That post generated some good cautionary comments regarding free energy, conservation of energy, and overall energy efficiency of a whole system such as an entire automobile. Any further thoughts on this topic?
Reality Check
Listen folks, if the claims make it seem like a product will do ridiculous things, then its probably a ridiculous product. Most experts say that fuel saving devices are largely scams and that, in lieu of expensive things like buying a more fuel efficient vehicle or completely changing your car’s aerodynamics, the only true way to increase your fuel mileage cheaply is the good old standby of changing your habits to up your car’s efficiency. In fact, in a post on Gas 2.0, Benjamin Jones points us to “100+ EcoDriving Tips to get Better Mileage in Your Car” and Edmunds.com has done its own field testing of many of these recommendations. Check them out and save your money.
Gas 2.0 Posts Related to Fuel Economy:
- How to Get 70 MPG Out of a Honda Civic
- 2009 Jetta BlueTDI Comes to US This Summer, Sports 60 MPG and Cleaner Emissions
- 100+ EcoDriving Tips to get Better Mileage in Your Car
- Can Improved Spark Plugs Boost Both Fuel Economy and Performance?
- Six New Technologies Will Help Manufacturers Reach the 35 MPG Goal (Without Hybrids)
- The World’s Most Fuel Efficient Car: 285 MPG, Not A Hybrid
Image Credit: adapted from d70Focus under Creative Commons
Recently I converted my 04 Cadillac to utilize water as fuel from the information I purchased from the water4gas website but the link I obtained from was called Water4fuel.info
Anyway, it’s been working great by me so far, and I’ve had it running for 4 months now.
Me…I’ll trust the Mythbusters when they tested devices like this and their verdict on them. BUSTED!
I have been reading extensively on almost every arguments from both sides.
If I may, We are talking about using the hydrogen or brown gas to improve the efficiency of ICE from about 20%.
Those who are against, please come out with something better than the obvious i.e. the law of conservation of energy, in this case the electrolysis of water which is irrelevant.
[...] recently featured this type of hydrogen-on-demand hybrid system in a Gas 2.0 post about potential fuel saving scam devices. At the end of that post I had to say that the jury was still out on these types of systems. There [...]
You’re pretty much spot-on with your hilarious reviews of these “products.” I do have some more info on the run your car on water system in a short article I wrote; http://ezinearticles.com/?Run-Your-Car-On-Water—Fact-Or-Fiction?&id=1206320.
Short story - there ain’t no free lunch.
Dan
Water 4 gas really does work.
Water4gas, the website is a scam because it wants money for information that has been around for a very long time. Electrolysis isn’t new, but the system is relevant.
It isn’t free energy it just improves efficiency and it works better on older cars simply because they are more inefficient at burning the gas.
The brute force method of producing the gas (12v high amperage) is definitely not the best way to do it but it’s the simplest way. The more money you invest in the system, the more money you’ll save on gas.
Working with chemical engineers as I do, I have asked a few for opinions, and all of the opinions have been positive regarding the theory. But even I know that theory usually works great on paper, but not always in real life.
I’m willing to try it on some of my older vehicles, but I have reservations about several issues (these are questions also…..feel free to suggest any solution!):
#1. I’m not crazy about installing a quart glass canning jar under my hood. Can a metal canister be used without affecting the operation? Preferably steel, but aluminum is an option.
#2. Map Sensor. 3 of the 4 vehicles I’m interested in doing this to have MAP sensors, and I’m wondering if the sensor can be damaged/ruined, or if it needs to be ‘fooled’ to read correctly for the computer.
Any ideas?
Hi!
The only way to prove if Water4gas is a sham, is to have Nick install one of these kits. Since he would be and unbiased source, then the report will have some credibility.
Water4gas is also offering the plans to build the kit yourself in their website; but they do not give you the whole thing. They are only trying to make a buck by selling you a already assembled kit. But they go as far as giving you a list of places where you can get the necessary materials. One more thing, if you do a search on Youtube for “hydrogen generators”, there will be a lot of videos. Do you think all those people are just fools who have nothing better to do!
Thank you!
My hydrolyser seems to work just fine. I designed it myself to withstand high temps (built from Lexan), hooked it to my 2001 DR650 Suzuki and did get improved mileage… What else can I say or need to say, I am not a scammer or a engineer or a chemestry major (hell I can’t even spell it) but it isn’t rocket science or brain surgury after all it is simply putting electricity in water and supplying it to the fuel feed on the engine. I do not like the products that use a catalyst so I designed my system to run on straight tap water which has plenty of crap in it that conducts. Then I filter it through what they call a bubbler and use stainless steel wadding as a flash suppresant. It works so well that I took one of those toy hydrogen rockets from the store, adapted it to accept my feed from my system and it is ready to launch in seconds. Sure we have a long way to go to making this a viable alternative to gasoline but gasoline didn’t just fall from the sky, they had to develop that also. I say if we didn’t waste money on nuclear dumps and war for more expensive oil which fuels very few people’s pocketbooks then this research would be a lot futher along. And whoever said something about NASA banning it’s use or whatever they said, ask yourself why in the hell they launch the space shuttle with it. All the people here saying all this bad stuff about alternatives are likley paid by the oil companies or flat out have a vested interest in the status quo… These are the things that don’t work.