Six New Technologies Will Help Manufacturers Reach the 35 MPG Goal (Without Hybrids)

As the automakers scramble to make plans for achieving 35 MPG by 2020, it seems that our suspicions that the task is entirely possible without fancy hybrids or hydrogen cars has been confirmed. The manufacturers been achieving high mileage in Europe and Japan for years now, so I expect to see it in the US eventually. Luckily, there are six exciting new technologies that are going to make it possible in the US.

These technologies are interesting because they come without the paradigm shift that seems to accompany buying a hybrid or a small economy car. Cars equipped with this green tech will be just like any other car, just more efficient.

More on the six new engine technologies after the break.

  1. Multistage oil pump: Oil pumps usually only pump oil out through one port, meaning that under every circumstance the pump ends up doing about the same amount of work. Multistage oil pumps, like those that are beginning to be released with some Toyotas, use two oil ports, one small and one larger, to make sure that the amount of oil being pump is optimized based on the operating conditions of the engine. During low-stress operation, only the smallest pump will be used. As the engine is put through its paces, it will switch to the large port, and finally, if you’re really going all out, both ports will open up to allow maximum flow.
  2. Shortened cylinder head: In the past, cylinder heads have remained a certain height in order to keep the valves aligned in operation. While this presents and issue for shorter cylinder heads (which save weight), guides on the top of the valve springs can be used in conjunction with standard valve guides to ensure smooth operation. The weight difference might not be that dramatic, but at the very least, it will cut down on some materials usage.
  3. Variable compression ratio: Engines are more efficient at higher compression ratios, but that doesn’t mean it’s always best to be running at the highest compression ratio you can. With that in mind, several manufacturers have begun exploring variable compression ratio engines, where the connecting rod length can be changed using an actuator so that during low-load operation (like driving on the freeway) compression ratio is reduced and fuel economy improves dramatically.
  4. Guided-spray turbo: The most important thing here is not the turbo, but the method of creating the air-fuel mix in the combustion chamber. The injectors and chamber have been redesigned so that spark plugs are positioned to more efficiently ignite the fuel-air mix and pistons have also been redesigned to create a swirling in the chamber (something that’s been used since Honda since 1992 in fuel economy-conscious engines). Together, all these designs make for incredibly efficient combustion, resulting in impressive power output and comparably good fuel economy numbers.
  5. Electromagnetic valve actuators: In my opinion, this is probably one of the neatest new technologies out there. By using electromagnets to control the valve train, the camshaft and all its friction losses and rotating mass would be replaced with a system of almost no moving parts that can also precisely control valve timing and adjust it to run the most efficiently in any condition. While expensive, this change could bring up to a 19% improvement in fuel efficiency, and might very well be implemented down the road.
  6. Hydraulic power electrification: Car makers have already begun this switch-over, as it is one of the most common-sense, and easiest things to do. Beginning with the move from belted radiator fans to electric, car makers have started trying to reduce parasitic loads on the engine. Because electric versions of things like power steering and A/C are more efficient (and run when the engine isn’t on, which is necessary for full hybrids), we’re already starting to see these things popping up on Honda and Toyota hybrid models. Soon manufacturers will be moving even to electric water pumps, which are more efficient and precise.

So, do we at Gas 2.0 anticipate seeing these technologies any time soon, or are they just more pie in the sky stuff that the automakers like to trot out to “prove” they’re “doing something.” Well, several of these we have seen already, and with the automakers scrambling to make 35 MPG in a very unfriendly market, it seems like the cheapest way to do so will be to use some of these tricks rather than trying to upgrade everyone to hybrids. Hopefully we’ll begin seeing these technologies in run-of-the-mill engines sooner, rather than later.

Source: PopMech

Posts Related to Fuel Economy and Engine Technology:

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

68 Comments

  1. i love america, struggling to 35mpg, my car does 50+ normally and if i drive gently goes to over 70. and they wonder why the world hates them, there is one surefire way to raise economy, take japans lead and impose a 2.5lt engine size limit, a seven liter V8 will never break 35mpg

  2. You say 35 MPG. That’s miles per gallon, right?
    Over here in England, our cars regularly go over 40 MPG. Perhaps if you Americans bought sensible cars, instead of needing a 5 MPG hummer to drive the kids to school, you’d actually get more use out of a single tank. Seriously, go buy something German.

  3. I drive a VW diesel van here for my work and get 35mpg all the time, and that’s with me cruising at 90mph. Just goes to show why fuel HAS to get more expensive in the US. And you have a 55mph speed limit, why all those cubic inches.

  4. People tend to think that the internal combustion engine is pretty much finished (in terms of technological advancement), but the drive to increase fuel economy is spurring some companies to go back to the drawing board.

  5. Gotta say, when i first saw the title saying “to reach 35mpg goal” I thought it had to be some sort of typo, 35mpg is nothing special in europe. Even in the faster cars its possible to get that. I know a guy with an XKR that can get that if he trys.

  6. I totally agree that we Americans should make the move to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

    I like the idea of any technology that can make a gasoline engine more fuel efficient. The big question that would remain for me is why not do those things AND couple them with a hybrid? If the gas engine improves to 35/40 mpg on its own, and you add a hybrid to it, you’re going to end up with even better mileage.

    Also, another thing we need to do in this country is stop advertising cars based on “speed” or “performance.” You don’t need a car to do that stuff. You need a car to get from A to B and back again without killing you or the planet.

    Besides, smaller cars are more fun to drive anyway. The only reason to have a big car in this country is because everybody else does so you need a taller bumper to protect yourself form all the other idiots on the road. As for high-performance cars, they’re really appealing in every way except for normal use.

  7. [...] http://gas2.org/2008/05/01/six-new-technologies-will-help-manufacturers-reach-the-35-mpg-goal-withou... Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]

  8. I’m driving a 94 Ford Escort. It gets up to 38 MPG. Does this mean that the US car companies have LOST technology?

  9. This is a horribly dumb article.

    “Without hybrids?” 35 MPG? I live in America and have had 35+ MPG for the last 10 years, and I DON’T drive a hybrid. I just don’t drive an SUV, I drive a small 4-door compact that wasn’t built by an American company. The “I don’t trust it” line is getting old, inregards to hybrids and high feul economy,CHINA has better fuel economy than we do- CHINA. If you want 35 MPG- don’t buy an American car- there’s a reason why no one else in the world wants to drive them.

  10. Valeo is developing quite a few technologies aimed at precisely what is described in this article.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »

Tell us what you think: