Safe Hydrogen Fuel System Ready for Market and Your Car!

Get Adobe Flash player

Put six-gallons of water in your fuel tank and drive anywhere you wish. The only thing you’ll need to replace, is a bit more water.

Last May, I wrote about Jim Hunt, a student at Carl Sandburg College in Galesburg, Illinois concerning his plasmatic induction system that turns water into hydrogen gas to fuel your vehicle.

Today, the system works, and Jim is looking for a company to manufacture and market his invention. His patent is secure, the system is proven and now ready to produce.

The YouTube video above shows Jim and his crew burning a hole in a stainless steel bowl with the hydrogen gas produced by his system.

His workshop is located on four acres of property in Monmouth, Illinois, and Jim says he’s been running cars and an old fire engine around the property using hydrogen produced by his invention. He also runs a 16 KW diesel engine generator with the system.

I interviewed Jim on Planetsave, where he talks about his invention and its future.

Related Posts:

Boeing Successfully Tests First Manned Hydrogen-Cell Battery Airplane
Algae Could Be Major Hydrogen Fuel Source
Chevy Volt’s Lithium-Ion Batteries Road- Tested By Month’s End
Green Gasoline? Scientists Produce $1/Gallon Gasoline From Non-Food Plant Material
Without Clean Electricity, Plug-In Vehicles aren’t So Hot
Mercedes 40-MPG Diesel Hybrid: Cleanest SUV on the Planet

Add a comment or question

26 Comments

  1. The argument against these devices is the quantity of electricity required to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen is more than can be got out of the system. This is wrong. Pulsing the electricity at certain frequencies splits the water much more easily, and thus makes it entirely possible for a water powered car to be achieved. Big Oil is however desperate to stop this knowledge becoming widely known.

  2. What’s funny to me…those who say “it takes more power to get power out of the water than you get from it”…

    In an car that’s not quite true in 1 sense (I think they’re right, EXCEPT)…

    What matters on a car is the FORM of the energy. The gas is burned and gone but it creates electricity…excess electricity. If you can use that power to REDUCE the amount of gas used and still produce the same amount of electricity, you have a net gain of gas, and a loss of water.

    Sounds like a good trade for me. If these systems work then they should be installed in ALL of the infrastructure systems by law (garbage, police, fire, etc.). This would at the least reduce critical infrastructure consumption AND dependence upon oil / oil price.

  3. It is unfortunate that more people haven’t had the experience of turning by hand a generator hooked up to a load (i.e. a light bulb) and then disconnecting the load (unscrew the light bulb). I was in high school physics when the physics teacher brought out a model. I was convinced when I was 10 that perpetual motion machines were possible. Others with more education/experience quoted the three laws of thermodynamics or other such “high-fultening sounding nonsense” to me until I believed them in theory but not in practice. When I cranked the generator it took real work! Take away the load and it took no work! It was at that moment that I understood, just because your using another form of energy (electricity in this case) doesn’t mean you can be creative and get around the three laws of thermodynamics! That said it doesn’t mean that there are not truly remarkable ways of generating energy. Take fission as an example, tremendous amounts of energy are store in un-split uranium atoms. Provide the means to split them with conveniently produced neutrons from the fission process and you get vast amounts of energy. Or nuclear fusion, a deuterium nuclei and tritium nuclei collided with enough energy to overcome the positive electric charges of their protons produce 14 mega-electron-Volts worth of energy (a room temperature photon is ~1/40 electron-Volts), a difference of eight orders of magnitude. I think we need to keep looking, because nature has not divulged all her really fantastic secrets to us, so far we found the obvious ones!

  4. [...] Safe Hydrogen Fuel System Ready for Market and Your Car! [...]

  5. I know nothing about the technical problems of hydrogen based fuels or any other fuels for that matter. What I do know is this ( in agreement with Brandon) the U.S. government or any other government that takes in so much money from the taxes on gasoline will never support any fuel conversion. Because of this reason, any technology that doesn’t include the use of oil as an energy source will be along time coming. Too many people are making money from $130 per barrel oil.

  6. can u send me info numbers for compleate kit for hydrigen not just a book my e-mail is above

  7. From my understanding the system not only burns the hydrogen but also increases the efficiency of the gas burned. This is why people still see mpg increases even though they are using the alternator, which is always going anyway.

  8. I was an auto technician for 10yrs but got a better paying job. When I saw the claims for the hydrogen generator I became very interested. In theory it sounds very possible. But I have listened to both sides of the argument. An alternator doesn’t charge the battery all the time. It has something called a voltage regulator that turns the alternator on “so to speak” which causes a load on the engine. When the alternator “kicks on” you can see, feel and hear the engine power drop, it is that noticeable. The cars computer compensates by bringing up the engine idle, in other words “dumping more fuel into the engine”. So my only doubt about fuel generators is “Will the increase in power from adding a small amount of hydrogen to the fuel be worth the loss in power from running the alternator”. I doubt it, but I would like to test it. I just wish I could do it without wasting my MONEY!

  9. Marcel you right on on the 25% plus efficient rating. My budy saw this on Disc last night and the hydrogen kit claimed fuel mileage increases from 24 MPG to 50. After they tested it, it only got 41. My uncle has one of these and he only gained 15 mpg from 17 - 32. So his V-8 F-150 gets the same MPG as the Toyota Camry. They still have not been able to reliably run on “free fuel”.
    There are a few claiming it but I have to see to believe. I am thinking a roof solar panel tied into a deep cycle battery might help off set the energy usage enough to run on free fuel. Or just plug a few deep cycles into a battery charger every night. It appears it takes only 15-20 amps to produce a considerable volume of hydrogen. Most alternators can handle that without added fuel consumption.

  10. If the Battery Is low in charge, the Alternator has more resistance to turning induced by its internal charging circut. As the Battery is getting closer to its fully charged voltage there is less resistance for the alternator to turn and just idles with the motor

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »

Tell us what you think: