I believe that the most viable energy solution for the US (not that wind and solar should not be advanced) is Nuclear. France has perfected their reactors and have standardized on a single type of reactor which all of their technicians understand. Their safety record is unblemished. Three Mile Island would not have even made the news had their technicians just allowed the automatic safety mechanisms work as designed. We must use this green, non-poluting source of energy for much of our electricity rather than burning up oil and coal for electricity. Oil and coal ARE poluting.

I believe that the most viable energy solution for the US (not that wind and solar should not be advanced) is Nuclear. France has perfected their reactors and have standardized on a single type of reactor which all of their technicians understand. Their safety record is unblemished. Three Mile Island would not have even made the news had their technicians just allowed the automatic safety mechanisms work as designed. We must use this green, non-poluting source of energy for much of our electricity rather than burning up oil and coal for electricity. Oil and coal ARE poluting.

If you look back about 15 years, you will see that Pickens was heavily involved in Natural Gas as a vehicle fuel. THe problem is distribution and the heavy tanks needed to hold the CNG in the cars.

I have asked my senators to for many years to come up with a better energy plan – one that includes alternative energy.

I feel that we can drill in ANWR and other places if we do so carefully and with new technologies, I think these places would be safe.

My plan is to open up ANWR and off shore areas for drilling AND for every barrel of oil we get from that, we must put in place an equal amount of energy from alternative sources. Simple plan that would appeal to both sides of the energy equation.

If you look back about 15 years, you will see that Pickens was heavily involved in Natural Gas as a vehicle fuel. THe problem is distribution and the heavy tanks needed to hold the CNG in the cars.

I have asked my senators to for many years to come up with a better energy plan – one that includes alternative energy.

I feel that we can drill in ANWR and other places if we do so carefully and with new technologies, I think these places would be safe.

My plan is to open up ANWR and off shore areas for drilling AND for every barrel of oil we get from that, we must put in place an equal amount of energy from alternative sources. Simple plan that would appeal to both sides of the energy equation.

step. Isn’t it also highly corrosive? Would all pipelines, gas pumps and (older) vehicle gas tanks

tolerate the liquid?

step. Isn’t it also highly corrosive? Would all pipelines, gas pumps and (older) vehicle gas tanks

tolerate the liquid?

Some bright souls decided that instead of tapping the methane gas from that landfill and compressing it for direct use in cars the gas should be used to power an ethanol plant.

Why take this extra step? Why not use this methane directly into cars and/or the general natural gas infrastructure and cut out the ethanol middleman?

Garbage and sewage can yield gas and synthetic oil and are yet woefully underutilized. Where municipal landfill and feedlot wastes ARE used is in powering ethanol plants because this is the politcally correct usage for them in the Corn Belt; not because this is the most efficient use for them.

Some bright souls decided that instead of tapping the methane gas from that landfill and compressing it for direct use in cars the gas should be used to power an ethanol plant.

Why take this extra step? Why not use this methane directly into cars and/or the general natural gas infrastructure and cut out the ethanol middleman?

Garbage and sewage can yield gas and synthetic oil and are yet woefully underutilized. Where municipal landfill and feedlot wastes ARE used is in powering ethanol plants because this is the politcally correct usage for them in the Corn Belt; not because this is the most efficient use for them.

Some bright souls decided that instead of tapping the methane gas from that landfill and compressing it for direct use in cars the gas should be used to power an ethanol plant.

Why take this extra step? Why not use this methane directly into cars and/or the general natural gas infrastructure and cut out the ethanol middleman?

Garbage and sewage can yield gas and synthetic oil and are yet woefully underutilized. Where municipal landfill and feedlot wastes ARE used is in powering ethanol plants because this is the politcally correct usage for them in the Corn Belt; not because this is the most efficient use for them.