How to Get 76 MPG

VWDiesel We don’t need new technology to save us, just a little ingenuity.

After a few minor tweaks, Ernie Rogers can get up to 76 mpg in his 2003 VW diesel Beetle:

He drove 1375 miles…[on] just 18 gallons of fuel– 1200 miles of which was accomplished on just one tankfull (15.5 gallons). His trip fuel economy was 76 miles per gallon. Rogers’ car included several small refinements that added up to the exceptional mileage: a drag reducing device he designed and built himself (pictures [here]), lower-rolling-resistance tires, low-friction engine oil, and use of a B5 biodiesel blend fuel to increase efficiency and improve emissions.

That’s right, it’s a non-hybrid that puts the Prius to shame. Granted, this test was at 55 mph, but the VW still gets between 57-65 mpg at normal freeway speeds.

What’s Ernie’s great innovation? His VW might not win a beauty pageant, but it gets the job done, and it’s based on a simple concept: reducing drag.

As explained on Ernie’s website, automobile drag occurs mostly at the rear, where the course of smooth-flowing air is disrupted. Think about an airplane wing, which reduces air resistance by by guiding it along the wing’s surface to a thin edge. Although the VW beetle might seem somewhat aerodynamic to the untrained eye, drag is produced as air follows the curve of the frame. To solve this problem and create smoother air flow, Ernie installed a homemade spoiler, improving fuel economy by 5-8%.

Add low-resistance tires, low-friction engine oil, and a lubricious fuel additive (biodiesel), and you’ve got major increases in gas mileage.

If a back-yard mechanic can do this, imagine what auto-manufacturing’s best and brightest (backed by $$$) could do.

Posts Related to Car Hacks and Green Car Technology:

For more information, see the links:

Drive55.org: VW Beetle wins fuel economy prize: 76 mpg

Max MPG: Aerodynamic Modifications for Maximum Mileage

Photo Credit

Repost this article
About Clayton B. Cornell

Clayton B. Cornell was formerly a professional blogger as Lead Writer for Gas 2.0, Important Media’s blog covering the future of sustainable transportation, and was covering biofuels and green car technology for Important Media (formerly GreenOptions.com) since the beginning of 2007. Before GO, Clayton ran the training program for one of the EPA’s largest public toxicology information libraries at Oregon State University, which was fulfilled under a $2-million Federal grant. He became a biodiesel enthusiast after experimenting with small-scale biodiesel production in OSU’s chemical engineering lab, and has extensive hands-on experience with diesel cars and trucks, including the practical use of biodiesel and straight-vegetable-oil (SVO) as alternative fuels. Clayton graduated from the University of Utah with honors, receiving a degree in Biology and Chemistry. On the side, Clayton likes to spend his time at the beach or in the mountains. He’s been a professional river-guide, amateur beer judge, and world traveler, and currently lives in San Francisco.

Comments

  1. shawn says:

    Everything I’ve read says E85 is less fuel efficient, how does he explain his opposite theory?

  2. shawn says:

    Everything I’ve read says E85 is less fuel efficient, how does he explain his opposite theory?

  3. You’re right that E85 is less fuel efficient than gasoline, diesel, or biodiesel. In this case though, Ernie Rogers used a mix of 95% diesel and 5% biodiesel fuel. Diesel engines are typically more efficient than gasoline engines. Paired with the modifications above, they can be super-efficient. If you’re still confused about the differences among these fuels, see the Biodiesel Mythbuster: http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/04/05/green-myth-busting-biodiesel/

  4. You’re right that E85 is less fuel efficient than gasoline, diesel, or biodiesel. In this case though, Ernie Rogers used a mix of 95% diesel and 5% biodiesel fuel. Diesel engines are typically more efficient than gasoline engines. Paired with the modifications above, they can be super-efficient. If you’re still confused about the differences among these fuels, see the Biodiesel Mythbuster: http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/04/05/green-myth-busting-biodiesel/

  5. Donald says:

    Awesome.

    “We don’t need new technology to save us, just a little ingenuity.”

    There is more to the energy problem than just being more efficient in using gas. Reducing drag and making current cars more efficient is great to give us more time to solve the problem, but the fact is that there is only so much oil in the world and if we keep using it, we *will* run out. However, reducing drag is a great temporary fix, and it’s a great concept to carry into the future with whatever fuel we end up using.

  6. Donald says:

    Awesome.

    “We don’t need new technology to save us, just a little ingenuity.”

    There is more to the energy problem than just being more efficient in using gas. Reducing drag and making current cars more efficient is great to give us more time to solve the problem, but the fact is that there is only so much oil in the world and if we keep using it, we *will* run out. However, reducing drag is a great temporary fix, and it’s a great concept to carry into the future with whatever fuel we end up using.

  7. kevinde4 says:

    I love that people are comparing standards to the Prius; “puts the Prius to shame”. If the Prius were the bad car, life would be good.

    A Prius owner.

  8. kevinde4 says:

    I love that people are comparing standards to the Prius; “puts the Prius to shame”. If the Prius were the bad car, life would be good.

    A Prius owner.

  9. James says:

    Did anyone read his site? he only got 55.6 mpg, thats with diesel doing 65 mph. The old EPA estimate was 49 mpg which included slower speeds and w/out the air conditioning running. So while he did improve it slightly it is nowhere near 76 mpg.

  10. James says:

    Did anyone read his site? he only got 55.6 mpg, thats with diesel doing 65 mph. The old EPA estimate was 49 mpg which included slower speeds and w/out the air conditioning running. So while he did improve it slightly it is nowhere near 76 mpg.

    • spencer says:

      I agree with you to an extent, however there are a few things you should know.

      1) yes, you’re right. he NEVER got 76mpg. That would be crazy.
      2) the epa estimates are nowhere near 49 mpg for this beetle tdi. I, myself, drive a 2001 and it’s epa estimate is 29city/40hwy.

  11. Derek Smith says:

    I aggree wtih the other guy there is only so much oil and we are going to run out someday no matter what. We need to get all of the big trucks off the road and start shipping stuff on trains again. and trains could be made tto run on nuclear power, and so could all off the ocean frieghters ships. and we need to do away with commericel air travel completly its just to much of a waste of fuel. and we need to learn to live on a local economy not a world economy ,and the stock market has got to go. imean I have traded stocks to but its stupid anyway. so just do away with it, and then we do have the option of using all of the corn oil soy oil and such to run our diesel cars and pickup trucks. and also dont forget the hydrogen we can make from electrolysis called browns gas to run our cars on demand , it works I have a 2 hp briggs engine running on pure browns gas made with water and baking soda. and 12 Volts 2 amps. almost free . my next step is to build a large browns gas or hho gas generator the will make enough gas to run a small 4 cylinder engine like the 1.0 geo engine this is do able and thats about it. I like the bug thig I have two vw jettas running on wvo And hho rigyht now. So people lets start thinking and put the oil companys almost out of business,

  12. Derek Smith says:

    I aggree wtih the other guy there is only so much oil and we are going to run out someday no matter what. We need to get all of the big trucks off the road and start shipping stuff on trains again. and trains could be made tto run on nuclear power, and so could all off the ocean frieghters\ ships. and we need to do away with commericel air travel completly its just to much of a waste of fuel. and we need to learn to live on a local economy not a world economy ,and the stock market has got to go. imean I have traded stocks to but its stupid anyway. so just do away with it, and then we do have the option of using all of the corn oil soy oil and such to run our diesel cars and pickup trucks. and also dont forget the hydrogen we can make from electrolysis called browns gas to run our cars on demand , it works I have a 2 hp briggs engine running on pure browns gas made with water and baking soda. and 12 Volts 2 amps. almost free . my next step is to build a large browns gas or hho gas generator the will make enough gas to run a small 4 cylinder engine like the 1.0 geo engine this is do able and thats about it. I like the bug thig I have two vw jettas running on wvo And hho rigyht now. So people lets start thinking and put the oil companys almost out of business,

  13. tomo-kun says:

    Very good design for a home-brew spoiler, it appears to be “done right.”

    When smart designed the… umm smart series of cars, they kept a low profile front-end, but added a spoiler as part of the body design, even on their convertibles. There is no question, it works. In combination with an efficient turbodiesel engine, it can work very well toward meeting 70 mpg right off the dealer’s lot.

  14. tomo-kun says:

    Very good design for a home-brew spoiler, it appears to be “done right.”

    When smart designed the… umm smart series of cars, they kept a low profile front-end, but added a spoiler as part of the body design, even on their convertibles. There is no question, it works. In combination with an efficient turbodiesel engine, it can work very well toward meeting 70 mpg right off the dealer’s lot.

  15. spencer says:

    I don’t think he ever got 76 mpg. I hate it when people don’t get the facts right.

  16. He’s increased fuel economy 5-8% with the wing. Great but not stunning
    http://www.max-mpg.com/html/tech/main.htm

    Some folks have improved efficiency on other cars by building underbody pans to to get another 5-10% depending on the car.

    The real benefit for this fellow is starting with an economical diesel.

    I wanted to put a diesel in my ’87 4Runner, but I read enough horror stories about dealing with CA DMV on that kind of conversion that I just put another gasser in it. Remember, CA won’t allow the Jeep 3.0 diesel…

Speak Your Mind

*